So what can this teach us in the West, especially in the United States?
First that the credit system is based on mutual responsibility. Yunus has developed an intricate system to provide support and guidance to those that receive these loans (I will not go into further detail about those here, please visit the Grameen Bank website for more information). He has been successful in building relationships with those obtaining loans, which in turn is highly effective in getting loans repaid. In shot, he bases his credit system not on your assets, but on mutual respect. What a concept.
Also, it shows us that there are intelligent, rational ways to confront poverty without government intervention. Sure, some government is necessary, but Yunus is building wealth without goverment. He is actually starting branches in the U.S., because he believes the microcredit concept could even have benefits here in the richest country in the world.
And here is the best part of all: he is getting rich doing it. In 2007, Grameen made around $150 million off of microcredit. Some liberals probably thing he is evil from benefiting from the backs of the poor. They, of course, sit in their Manhattan flats or California mansions while criticizing, while Yunus pours his money back into the company, which helps another generation of poor. By making money, he is making the world a better place; a mutually beneficial path to helping the world's poor.
You go to the Grameen Bank website, you know what they are worried about? Not rampant poverty, although that is their mission. No, they are worried about Mr. Obama's massive stimulus plan and budget, and how we as a country are going to pay for it! They are worried, like much of the world, because they understand that the driving force of world capitalism is the United States.
With this week's rollout of the Toxic Asset plan from our government, it may be time to look at what we are doing right, but more especially, what we are doing wrong in the banking industry. And maybe we should put aside our ego, and look to examples like Grameen to see how to make our financial industry more sound, and possibly more profitable. We must look at the financial sector on a global scale. Allowing more funds to flow to the poorest of the poor in this world likely will have long term benefits both the other countries as well as the United States. And I sometimes wonder if these poor may be holders of credit than our own citizens.
Published by Neoavatara
Grew up in Michigan, went to college at the University of Michigan. After completing medical school and residency, I completed my fellowship at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. I am currently runni... View profile
How to Use Paypal to Become a Micro-LenderKiva connects sponsors with micro-finance institutions to give micro-loans to small businesses in third world countries.- Is Foreign Aid the Solution to Global Poverty?With poverty a growing concern, what are ways we can decrease this global issue?
- Profits Among the Poor: The Base of the Socioeconimic Pyramid is a Richer Market T...Businesses are changing the way they see the poor and recognizing the potential "fortune at the bottom of the pyramid"
- How Not to Get Yourself in Trouble when You Teach English in a Foreign CountryI teach English as a Foreign Language in Thailand. I've had so many funny experiences in the classroom with students misunderstanding me. These are just a few of them.
- Fighting Poverty with MicrofinanceMicrofinance helps people live independently and with dignity.
- Teach Children to Express Anger Constructively
- African Leaders $5 Million Contest - Will it End African Aid?
- Why Muhammad Yunus Should Be Deemed the Most Influential Person of 2006
- 2006 Nobel Peace Prize Awarded to Founder of Micro-Credit Loan Programs
- Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) in a Global Economy
- Can Microfinance Make a Macro Difference?
- Top Ten Songs of Third Eye Blind



