2010 Unemployment Extension - Reid May Choose to Drag UI Extension Passage Out AGAIN
Is Harry Reid STILL Using the Unemployed for Political Gain?
And what a relief that was to me. At last, it seemed, perhaps Senator Reid had decided he had gotten all he could out of our suffering and he was just going to pass the unemployment extension bill next Tuesday and get our benefits back to us.
Reid had, indeed, taken care of a number of procedural issues during the Senate's Thursday session in preparation for a vote on H.R. 5618, the "Restoration of Emergency Unemployment Compensation Act of 2010", which the House passed on July 1, just before breaking for the 4th of July recess.
This would have been the swiftest route for restoration of unemployment benefits. This bill, a standalone UI extension bill, has already been passed in the House and would require only passage in the Senate to be sent up to the President for signature and enactment. At last, it appeared that Reid was going to quit stalling or taking other action for political gain that jeopardized or slowed restoring benefits to the millions of Americans already dying on the vine over the Senate's delays.
However, it now appears that, in spite of taking those procedural actions to clear the way for a vote on H.R. 5618, Reid has, instead, put H.R. 4213 as well as a new amendment to that bill on the schedule for Tuesday, June 20, a strong indication he may put that UI extension bill version up for a vote rather than the House bill.
Both are similar in terms of the benefits to the jobless. However, there are several other more glaring problems with choosing the Senate version of unemployment extensions.
First of all, neither the House nor the Senate have apparently seen Reid's new amendment to the unemployment extension bill yet. If Reid chooses to bring this bill to the floor, Senate rules would allow debate for another 30 hours before the vote - More delay. Perhaps it won't happen and they the Senate will agree to move forward with the vote where it will no doubt pass. But the Republicans, still concerned over adding to the deficit, could continue to take that time to try to make their point. Why allow that to happen? No - Why CAUSE that to happen? Honestly, if Reid is concerned about the unemployed, why would he subject us to that kind of additional stress and further delay? Could it be to continue to use it to demonize the Republicans for "obstructing" the bill?
Secondly, for a bill to pass through Congress and go on to the President, it must have been approved by both houses in identical form. The Senate's version of unemployment benefits is a greatly altered iteration of the House's original H.R. 4213, the "American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act of 2010" or "Tax Extenders" bill. But the Senate's recent version of the unemployment extension bill, along with Reid's new amendment, is barely recognizable as the original House version at this point. This means, if this is the unemployment extension bill that Reid puts up for a vote, even after the Senate finally passes it, it will then have to go back to the House AGAIN for them to vote on it.
Again, I don't mean to alarm you. It is most likely to pass. But by choosing the Senate version, Reid is choosing to allow all this to take one or two days LONGER than the House bill would have taken. Another delay for the unemployed who have already been stalled and stalled and are suffering mightily - many of us perhaps irreparably - for it.
For a man that continuously tells the media and the American people that he is "in touch" with us and understands our pain, it seems Reid really doesn't get it at all. Many hundreds of thousands of us have been without benefits now for many weeks. Many have already lost homes, cars, everything they have and have already been forced to the street, having difficulty even feeding themselves or their families. Still more, like myself, are not far behind them. Every day that we have to wait for our unemployment benefits to be restored is a day that we grow closer to losing everything we have. The despair in the thousands of comments I have read from good people all over this country that are suffering is absolutely heartbreaking. How can Harry Reid, if he is so concerned about us, do ANYTHING that would delay passage of unemployment extensions by one more day? By one more HOUR??
I have written about this extensively. I hope some of you will dig through some of my library and find out more. Reid and the Democrats could have passed UI extensions long ago if they had been willing to compromise even just a little. The Republicans have offered multiple bills and amendments for our unemployment benefits extensions that were all actually much more generous for us than the Democrats are offering. And they have found ways to pay for our extensions that stops adding to the job killing deficit that is destroying this economy and this country.
The Republicans offered using unallocated stimulus funds. I hear the Democrats and the liberal media saying that they don't want to spend the stimulus funds on us, they want to use it for job creation. But didn't Nancy Pelosi just say that unemployment benefits are the best form of stimulus and job creation there is?? Then why not use them for us and do that job creating she was talking about right here, right now?
The Republicans offered all sorts of ways to cut unnecessary spending and bloated budgets in Washington. I keep hearing the liberals saying that the Republicans were spending a lot and adding to the deficit before. Well, so what? Didn't you and I spend more when we had more? Didn't a lot of us get credit cards and spend beyond what we actually made at some point in our lives when our income seemed solid and we felt we had a way to pay for it? But haven't you changed your ways now that times and your finances have changed? Well, so have the Republicans. Wish they'd done it sooner and more effective at stopping the Democrats and this president from QUADRUPLING the Bush deficit they all remind us of constantly. They quadrupled it IN LESS THAN 18 MONTHS!
Even the President's own commission has just told Obama that this deficit is KILLING THIS COUNTRY AND IT HAS TO STOP NOW OR THE COUNTRY WILL NOT SURVIVE. So, why are the Democrats so intent on adding to the deficit when the Republicans have already given them easy ways to take even better care of us with MORE in unemployment benefits extensions without further damaging the economy and ruining our chances for jobs?
The truth is, the Democrats, this President and the biased media has been misrepresenting what has happened in the Senate on this issue all along. The Republicans have never been against extending our unemployment benefits. They have merely asked, over and over again, that their cost not be added to the deficit. That the bleeding finally be stopped.
Harry Reid could have accepted any number of Republican offers to provide us even temporary benefits so we didn't have to go through this hell while they hashed all this out.
Harry Reid could have put up for a vote a Republican UI extension bill before the 4th of July recess.
He could have accepted a compromise with Republican Senator George Voinovich for his 60th vote on REID'S UI Extension bill before the recess.
He could have put up a Republican unemployment extension bill on July 12 and gotten it passed.
He could have done that any day last week.
But let's just say the "right" thing for the country is to add the cost of our unemployment extensions to the deficit instead of pay for it as they could (Does that sound "right" for the country to you?). Okay, then if Reid's and the Democrats' true concern was for us, now that the replacement for Senator Byrd has been named, he could have kept the Senate in session Friday night and through the weekend and gotten this taken care of days earlier. Seems fair to me, since they've taken TWO vacations since this all started and we all started losing unemployment benefits weeks ago.
But let's just say that those poor, overworked Senators just couldn't work a weekend to help us out. Reid could do what he was originally apparently preparing for and just pass the House version of unemployment extensions on Tuesday so it's done and over with. There is no rational reason to take any more risks with our benefits or to allow them to take one more day, one more hour, one more minute longer to get to the President's desk.
Except, of course, as I have explained in previous articles, unless Reid and the Democrats benefit every day, every hour, every minute they can keep us hurting, while they go to the microphones and blame the Republicans so at least the unemployed will vote for the Democrats. THAT is the ONLY reason I can see for extending our pain and voting on an unemployment extension bill that will take longer to make into law.
Harry Reid is in control of the Senate. He will have the option of putting whichever unemployment benefits extension bill he wants to on the floor for a vote on Tuesday. Whatever he puts up should pass. Don't worry about that. It's just a matter of milking every last vote out of our plight that he can, which bill he chooses. Be watching.
Source:
http://www.opencongress.org/articles/view/1984-Update-on-Tuesday-s-Unemployment-Vote
Published by S Gardner
S. Gardner is a freelance writer and researcher. She has experience as a weight loss and health counselor, a real estate agent, a small business owner and a high school history and civics teacher. She is a... View profile
2010 Unemployment Extension Bill Voted Down Again in Senate as Millions...2010 Unemployment Extension Bill Voted Down Again In Senate as unemployed Americans face financial crisis. This is just wrong. President Obama needs to aggressively pursue this...
Senate and 2010 Unemployment Extension Bill: A Dereliction of Duty by Pu...Over a million unemployed Americans want the answer to one question: Why can't Congress come together long enough to vote on and pass an unemployment extension bill?
2010 Unemployment Extension Bill: Drug Testing for Benefits Alternate PlanSenator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) unveiled an amendment this week that he wants added to the 2010 Unemployment Benefits Extension Bill that simply has people up in arms. Why are so man...
When Will the 2010 Unemployement Extension Bill Get Passed? and How?The 2010 Unemployment Extension Bill was voted down in the Senate last week. What are they doing this week to get it passed?- 2010 Unemployment Extension Bill in Limbo -- No Benefits Equals Collateral DamageThe 2010 Unemployment Extension Bill is designed to extend unemployment benefits for the long-term unemployed through November. The hard, cold numbers reflect that there are going to be at least a million individuals...
- Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid Votes 'Nay' Against 2010 Unemployment E...
- 2010 Unemployment Extensions - Senate Goes on Recess Without Passing UI Extension...
- 2010 Unemployment Extension - Senate to Vote on House UI Extension Bill
- The 2010 Unemployment Extension Bill on a Long Agenda as Congress Returns Before...
- Update on America's Economy and 2010 Unemployment Extension Bill
- The 2010 Unemployment Extension Bill ~ the Forgotten People ~ the Unkown Numbers
- 2010 Unemployment Extension Bill Update: Senate Releases New Proposal ~ Senator B...
- Several possible unemployment extension bills could come to a vote next week.
- Harry Reid may now choose to put up the Senate UI Extension, which will take longer.
- Why wouldn't Reid just choose the House UI Extension rather than drag this out any longer?



20 Comments
Post a CommentS Gardner--coulda woulda shoulda.....we jobless can wait a day or two more if it means that HR4213 will include ALL of the provisions that the American people need--from Medicare support to Agriculture help. Btw, the standalone bill is MISSING the extra $25/week FAC that many jobless need. The longer HR4213 bill DOES include the $25 for new claimants and the ones who have worked part-time & have been forced to open new claims.
And just a brief word about the Bush tax cuts (the 787 Billion you mentioned was the Obama stimulus bill that didn't stimulate anything) ... But re: the Bush tax cuts. It's the Dems and the media telling you they were tax cuts for the wealthy. Those tax cuts for "the wealthy" in actuality were across the board and benefited everyone. The amount the truly wealthy wound up paying was MORE. The amount the middle class wound up paying was way less. Some of the cuts - Bush removed the marriage penalty - that's everybody, not just the wealthy. He doubled the child tax credit - that's everybody, not just the wealthy. For 7.9 million modest income families, they got to stop paying taxes all together. Letting the Bush tax cuts expire will increase taxes on EVERYONE and will COST MORE JOBS as employers have to cut back to pay higher taxes. When you hear class warfare statements like "tax cuts for the rich", look deeper. THAT is spin.
tried to get us benefits over and over and over again to tide us over while the overall debate went on so we wouldn't have had to have been suffering while they did their think in Washington, but the Democrats have turned them down every time. And that is where I see the Democrats as using us, Jim. Why not compromise just a hair and take care of us? BOTH sides need to do this. By paying for EVERYTHING else in the original bill but leaving UI benefits unpaid for when they know the Republicans are trying to stop the fiscal bleeding, seems to me to be a direct ploy to use our suffering to demonize the Republicans to get the Democrats votes. THAT is my point.
@JimPA - I agree with you that a few Republicans have said things that are completely ridiculous. The comments you mentioned were awful and represent some very misguided thinking and attitudes on the part of a handful of politicians and, unfortunately, a good number of Americans. I do not condone such ignorant and unthinking comments. I have, in fact, written a number of articles specifically attempting to explain what we, the unemployed are going through, sharing not only my own story but the thousands of heartrending comments and stories of the unemployed all over this country. But I am also attempting to get the word out that the Republicans in the House and Senate as a group have NOT tried to prevent us from getting unemployment extensions, as the Democrats and media wants us to believe. THAT is the spin. The Republicans have attempted repeatedly to pass UI extensions but without adding to the deficit and the Democrats have blocked THOSE bills. The Republicans have also ...
I am a 58 y.o. self supporting female with Type 2 diabetes. I was laid off after 18 years with same company. These delays of passing the extension has caused my health to deteriate. I am looking forward to death.
You can try to SPIN this anyway you want, but the TRUTH is even the GOP attitude about the unemployed has been very negative. They don't want to work, they are hobo's, lets drug test them, etc. They (GOP) want the bill PAID for but its a different story for the 787 BILLION Bush tax cut for the rich. The GOP party have shot themselves in BOTH feet with this issue!
The Senate needs to look for Job in November majority still rule and as history repeats itself the public will vote for protection of thier family,Homes and Jobs
... If you're interested in taking a look at government spending cuts the Republicans suggested - ... for instance, cutting back congressional air travel budgets (there goes Nancy Pelosi's $100,000 in flight alcohol tab - That was one trip!) ... Here is an article I posted a while back that included a lot of Senator Coburn's Senate Floor Speech - http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/5539496/2010_unemployment_extensions_senator.html?cat=9 Or look up Senator John Thune's amendment ... Senator Scott Brown's bill ... A number of good speeches that explain what they were trying to do. They were NOT trying to keep us from getting benefits or from getting the $25 per week, etc. Just trying to stop the spending as it's gotten so huge in the last 17 months -
@Gofigr - I'm glad if Reid is putting that back in. It was in the initial H.R. 4213 but then the Democrats took it out weeks ago as they were trying to whittle down the bill (when it was still a much larger bill covering many different issues) in order to get Republican votes. The Republican version - The Thune Amendment DID include it. If I'm not mistaken, Scott Brown's Ui extension bill (he's also a Republican) also includes it. The Democrats took it away along with other provisions in the broader bill to try to reduce the cost - the amount they added to the deficit. But the Republicans always wanted to give it to us and always wanted to give us our extended benefits (one of the Republicans also took us through December not just until after the election in November as the Dems bills do. The Republicans didn't want to reduce what we got - they just found other ways to offset the cost - unused stimulus money and then lots of government waste cuts - ...
Don't know what happened to my previous comments but I identified the major difference monetarily benefiting the Claimants (the $25/week stimulus money that President Obama approved)that actually the Democrates want and not the Republicans.So, S Gardner thanks for addrssing that in your comment.