Because of this, it makes sense that we should look at the following three planks of today's liberal agenda and compare them to their counterparts that existed under horrible regimes of the past.
1. Gun Control
Joyce Rosenwald, of usa-the-republic.com, writes: "As a result of the 1928 Law, all firearms and firearms owners were registered. To take firearms from anyone they distrusted, the Nazis simply did not renew permits... [they] could now easily confiscate all firearms and ammunition from any, or all, selected groups. The gun law of 1928 had served the Nazis well. It made almost all law abiding firearms owners known to the authorities. The 1928 law on firearms and ammunition helped destroy democracy in Germany, by disarming the law abiding majority..."
In the United States, it is also the law-abiding citizens whose freedoms are threatened by well-meaning but delusional people, who actually believe that rendering honest people helpless will bring the criminal element under control. For more information about the 2nd Amendment, please refer to my article, "A Well Regulated Militia: The Military or the People?"
2. Defiance of the Right to Life
In the world of tyranny, Jewish people and others were considered sub-human by an arbitrary standard. In the world of the free, the yet-do-be-born are also considered not to be living souls by an arbitrary belief.
Many within the medical and scientific communities argue that life begins at conception. Since there is so much controversy, why can't the benefit of the doubt be granted, and why can't we "err" on the side life?
Both belief systems appear to be rooted denial, with stubborn or selfish motives involved. For an overview about abortion, please read my article, "Convenience Abortion: A Choice for Wrongdoing."
3. Restrictions on Freedom of Speech
Under the system that overtook Germany, one could be greatly penalized for speaking the truth. Because of socialism in our land, much free speech has also been eliminated. If you don't believe this, try placing an ad in your local paper using the wordage of your choice. The newspaper company will inform you of the small amount of free speech you actually have.
There have also been numerous attempts to enact a so-called "Fairness Doctrine," which is nothing more than an attempt to silence those broadcasting reality over the airwaves.
To read more about free speech, please check out my article, "Freedom of Speech: The First Amendment Explained."
There are other examples of how liberal programs come from dubious beginnings, but these three represent the most flagrant examples of what jeopardize the rights of the innocent today.
Published by Marty K.
Involved in various businesses throughout life, including iron & metal, landscape, sales in companies and freelance, business support services. View profile
- Don Imus' Firing, the First Amendment and Freedom of SpeechThe loss of Mr. Imus' job has nothing to do with Freedom of Speech or the First Amendment. The firing is an example of what happens when the Boss finds it economically advantageous to sack an employee.
- Freedom of Speech - Your Basic Civil Rights Are Being ThreatenedWhat happened to freedom of speech and how can we preserve what our forefathers saw for our future.
- Freedom of Speech, Do We Still Believe in It?Our Freedom of Speech is slowly becoming controlled. The political figures have convinced people that it is our duty to take a stand and correct the entertainers instead of correcting our ways of handling situations l...
What is Free About Freedom of Speech?Freedom of Speech - Freedom of Speech? What's That?My thoughts on Americans freedom of speech, or lack there of.
- When Does Freedom of Speech Go Too Far?
- Freedom of Speech and Respect
- Ten Blogs About Progressive/Liberal Politics & Philosophy
- Scientology Stops Freedom of Speech Again - at MySpace
- The Freedom of Speech
- Freedom of Speech: What it Really Means to Tim Hardaway
- The Real Cost of Freedom of Speech
- Quite often, people have been criticized because they oppose liberal or socialist causes.
- Law-abiding citizens' rights can be threatened by well-meaning but delusional people.
- People can be considered sub-human by an arbitrary standard.



