34 Out of the Top 50 Largest Law Firms in the US Did Work on Behalf of Terrorists Captured in the War on Terror
This disturbing statistic just confirms the conventional wisdom that many people hate lawyers-and I mean really, really...really hate them. If they didn't already hate lawyers before, they sure as heck will now with this revelation that many of the Department of Justice's top lawyers/advisers are biased in favor of captured terrorists. How insane is that?? Isn't the-or maybe I should write shouldn't the-priority of Department of Justice lawyers be to work on protecting US citizens instead?
This shocking revelation that 34 of the nation's top 50, largest law firms are ideologically in love with working on behalf of captured terrorists merely confirms that many lawyers in the US are a stubbornly left-leaning bunch...to the extreme. In fact, they're so extreme that a certain, hardcore bunch of them has found a well-protected home within the US Department of Justice and, armed with their bias in favor of captured terrorists, may well be building a proverbial fifth column to aid terrorists by prosecuting them ineffectively as "criminals" instead of what they really are.
According to the Washington Times, this whole mini-scandal (only because this explosive story hasn't just yet been picked up by more media sources...because they're likely covering Al Gore's sham global warming instead) dates back to last November when GOP, Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley was obstructed relentlessly by Eric Holder at a Senate hearing. At issue in Holder's obstructionism were requests by Grassley to have the Department of Justice provide a comprehensive list of detainee cases from which Department of Justice lawyers were recused and also the names of said lawyers.
After ignoring Grassley's very understandable request in light of national security for an antagonistic three months, Holder dispatched his aide, Ronald Welch, to answer Grassley. As predictable and as observable from past episodes of how the Obama Administration deals with transparency requests, Welch's response was insufficient and even covered-up exactly the names of the cases and lawyers at the Department of Justice, the whole point of Grassley's request. Welch's response would only admit that nine lawyers did work for terrorists.
Now, according to the Legal Times, this is already a falsehood because it identified 14 Department of Justice lawyers who did work on behalf of captured terrorists! Their names are Eric Holder himself, Associate AG Thomas Perrelli, former Deputy AG David Ogden, James Garland, John Bies, Aaron Lewis, Stuart Delery, Eric Columbus, Chad Golder, Brian Hauck, Donald Verrilli, Lanny Breuer, Tony West and Neal Katyal.
Without a doubt, the only rational explanation that can be thought of for this veil of secrecy from a Department of Justice under Obama that is anti-transparency is...shame. As in, they're much too ashamed of admitting just how many fifth column-building terrorist sympathizers work under Eric Holder in the Department of Justice! The beauty of this expose is how it also finally explains why the ideology of Eric Holder and the whole Department of Justice has been to disastrously try terrorists/enemy combatants merely like little criminals: because they're a bunch of radically ideological, liberal zealots who improperly believe in terrorists having constitutional rights.
To send Marc questions, praise or criticism, you can email him at marc_schenker@telus.net
More Reading: We known Democrats hate Sarah Palin, but now we know they hate her Down Syndrome Baby, too, Glenn Beck: I was a social liberal before I went to Alcoholics Anonymous, JD Hayworth throws Obama Birthers under the Bus
Sources:
David Dieteman, Blaming Lawyers: A Misdiagnosis, LewRockwell.com
Fifth Column, Wikipedia
Editorial, Identifying the Gitmo Nine, Washington Times
American Taliban Lawyer Working For Holder, Fox Nation
Injustice, Insecure - The Fifth Column in our Justice Department, Red State
Published by Marc Schenker
Contact Marc at marc_schenker@telus.net to praise, criticize, or request anything of him since he fears nothing or no one. Marc Schenker is a political junkie and Political Writer and Analyst for Associated... View profile
Department of Justice Wants Congress To Update to Identity Theft Laws In order to help combat identity theft, the Department of Justice has proposed legislation to the Congress - Department of Justice Sues South Carolina's Spartanburg County Over Sex Discrimina...The Department of Justice is suing Spartanburg County, S.C. for allowing the sexual harassment of a county employee.
- Department of Justice Awards More Than $3 Million to Fight Crime in Kansas According to the United States Department of Justice, Kansas will be one of many recipients to receive awards to help fight crime. The Department of Justice has recently awarded Kansas $3 million for this cause.
- We Fought the Department of Justice in Court and Won Hands Down. a 100% VictoryYou, of course, all have heard our claim that we are always successful in resolving our clients' debt workouts. We are sometimes put to an extreme test.
Privasoft Awarded Department of Justice Office of Information Policy Fre...Privasoft (www.Privasoft.com) announced today that the company has been awarded a contract from the US Department of Justice (DoJ) Office of Information Policy (OIP) to provide...
- Is the Obama Administration and the Department of Justice Protecting the New Black...
- The Failure of International Law: Why the Department of Justice Will Not Prosecute...
- Department of Justice Comments on the Final Judgement in Microsoft Anti-trust Suit
- The Department of Justice Says "Trust Us" when it Comes to Net Neutrality
- Department of Justice Awards $1.8 Million in Anti-Gang Funding to Florida
- Department of Justice Files Complaint Alleging Sex Discrimination Against the City...
- Brief Info about the United States Department of Justice





17 Comments
Post a CommentWow this was well written and a little disturbing to me.
Including Rudy Giuliani's law firm! Yes...America's Mayor defending Al Quaida...and so did the JAG. Yes let's paint every law firm that takes on pro bono work, as terrorist synpathizers!
Interesting analysis. Here's an article about how Chehttp://www.opednews.com/duncan_0090304_NJ_terrorism1.htmrtoff, Republican, defended an alleged terrorist
I think that any terrorist who is not a US citizen should be tried by a military tribunal. And any terrorist who is a US citizen should be tried for treason.
Nice eye-catching article. But your article fails to prove any wrong doing on the part of the lawyers. My question is: How many of those lawyers were appointed by the court to defend the terrorists. Both you and I know that a lawyer cannot decline an order to defend one who cannot afford a lawyer. I do have one question for you: With regard to the intent of the lawyers, what happened to the motto "innocent until proven guilty?"
Frightening statistics. Sounds like treason to me.
This is just further proof of this Administration's failure to understand that it is WAR and not some "overseas contingency operation." Great article, Marc.
Wow! This is scary to think about...
How is it that the best lawyers are never on your side?
The thing I hate the most is that fact that the US taxpayers have to pay for all of this. Do the terrorist come here and pay for their own lawyers? I think not. And, who do we think paid for the "underwear bomber" to go to one of the best burn units in the country. Why don't put our tax dollars to better use? You know what would be a cost effective solution? How about a bullet between the terroist's eyes. Cheap and effective. Hey, you'll never hear me complain about taxes that actually get a job done :) !!