3-D Remake of Titanic in 2012

Will 3-D Titanic Be Iceberg that Sinks Literary Films?

Nancy Tracy
With newspapers like U.S.A. Today reporting that Titanic will be re-released in 2012 as a 3-D movie, 100 years after the doomed ship hit an iceberg, movie buffs are speculating on what other old movies might be remade into 3-D. The huge financial success of James Cameron's Avatar, shot in 3-D, and Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland, converted into 3-D after shooting, opens the floodgates to popular older movies resurfacing in 3-D, not unlike an aging actress who tries to resuscitate her drowning career with a face lift.

Other popular movies that are likely to be converted to 3-D are the Star Wars series and the Lord of the Rings trilogy, according to a recent article in the Sunday Times of London. "Hollywood execs must be breathing a huge sigh of relief!" commented Times reader Pete Rogers. "Instead of having to wonder what film to remake or churn out a sequel for next-or what 80s series to make into a film-they can remake every action film ever as a 3-D."

While movies like Titanic at least have a story line, many of the movies that are likely to be remade in 3-D, such as George Lucas's Star Wars franchise, are noted more for their special effects and action scenes than sophisticated plots or characters.

A recent comic strip illustrated this trend away from literary film-making with a teenage boy raving to his father about a 3-D movie he'd just seen that was loaded with special effects. "What was it about?" asked the father. The son looked at him curiously, as if his father had just turned into a dinosaur. "Who knows?" he said. "That's not the point."

For many movie-goers these days, the plot is not the point. Nor are the characters. What draws modern ticket buyers into movie theaters is pharmatainment, the thrill seeking high derived from multi-sensory high-tech visual and sound effects that flood movie viewers with a roller coaster rush of adrenaline.

For people who grew up with movies that contained complex, riveting plots and three-dimensional characters (psychologically and emotionally 3-D, not visually), the trend toward style over substance threatens to turn Hollywood movies into animated big screen comic books.

Times reader Steve Irving was concerned about the effect 3-D movies will have on the future of movie making. "If 3-D becomes the new standard then no new studio projects that rely simply on story and characterisation are likely to see the light of day," he wrote. "Avatar may have been visually stunning, but it was otherwise bereft of any virtue. It will be a sad day if the magic of cinema is forever replaced by the spectacle of it."

Sources:

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2010/03/james-cameron/1

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article6982297.ece

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1258336/Titanic-3-D-James-Camerons-Avatar-followup-2012.html

Published by Nancy Tracy - Featured Contributor in Arts & Entertainment

Nancy Tracy is a Yahoo! Featured Contributor for arts & entertainment. She enjoys writing about a variety of topics from psychology to politics to popular culture. Her article on "Transient Global Amnesia" w...  View profile

21 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Anthony Katilius11/17/2010

    I'll look forward to the 3D upgrades. It should be nice to see many of the classic action flicks in a whole new light. As for whether or not 3D will detract from focus on the story, maybe at first, but the focus will go back to story before long. This 3D is a new thing, a gimmick if you will, and the movie studios will want to milk it for what it's worth, whether it's here to stay or not. Eventually it won't be so exciting anymore simply for a film to be in 3D.

  • Ali Canary5/13/2010

    Feh, I'm already over the 3D thing. I got contacts so I wouldn't have to wear glasses, after all.

  • Mike Hatz4/4/2010

    3-D is AWESOME! However, it is no substitute for great writing and plot-structure. I don't like where this is going either, because society at large has been so dumbed-down that they'd rather be thrilled than enlightened.

  • Sheryl Young3/30/2010

    They're even saying TV will be going 3-D. I'm not sure I want that as a constant diet -- there goes another "choice"!

  • Anne Stjern3/28/2010

    3D just doesn't get it for me. I never have liked them and I'm hoping this trend (the 3rd of my movie-going life) will be short lived and we can go back to relying on story to move the film.

  • Smorg3/28/2010

    Titanic in 3D.... Great. Now I'll be able to experience being in a sinking ocean liner without actually getting wet! ;oP I don't think I'd want to see Star Wars in 3D, tho... would be too distracted to know what to look at much of the time!

  • Kristen Wilkerson3/26/2010

    I heard the 3D is coming to televisions in the near future. That is probably why movies are going there now - for future home video sales opps.

  • Michele Starkey3/26/2010

    I just like to watch the movie - if it has a good plot - what's the value of 3D? Cheers :)

  • Philip Theibert3/25/2010

    Okay - who needs a plot if you can see people drowning in 3D ? LOL

  • Kim Keason3/25/2010

    It will go full circle again. Although, with Titanic...the boat sank. Sorry, didn't mean to spoil it for everyone.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.