1. Knights are extremely useful pieces because of their irregular movement. Unlike Bishops, they can move from light to dark squares easily. Knights are the only pieces that can move at the beginning of the game before pawns move. Knights are are most powerful in the center of the board because there they have more options for movement. A Knight, unlike a bishop, cannot move long distances so they can be trapped easily if they are in a corner. Free them up in the center of the board in order to do the most damage with them and allow them to escape if they need to.
2. Knights are good at taking enemy pieces because of their movement, but once again be careful where you land. Knights are useless if they are stuck in a corner by enemy pieces. Many people consider Bishops and Knights about equal, with Knights slightly more useful because of their ability to change the color squares that they are on. Knights can make good backup pieces because they can defend from angles that no other piece can.
3. Knights are great for forked attacks, especially when the King is involved. Knights are the only piece that can check the King without being within a diagonal range for a counter attack. As a result, Knights can check Kings and then use the extra turn to take another piece. Knights are worth being sacrificed for any piece except for a pawn, depending on the part of the game that you are in. A Bishop for a Knight is often not a good trade, unless you are trying to lower the mobility of your opponent.
4. Knights are not particularly good at protecting your King because the King is safest in the corners, where Knights are weakest. For Knights, defense is only done offensively. Knights can be very weak against Pawns because of their nature of protecting one another and how numerous they are. A Knight in a board full of Pawns is like a tank in a field of land-mines. Because Pawns typically take up the center of the board, it's always a good idea (for a Knight's advantage) to take them out at quickly as possible.
5. Knights are excellent at early checkmates when the King is blocked in with his own pieces. In late checkmates, the Knight is best as a protective piece because his attack range is small. Knights are not as useful in endgame situations because of their limited mobility compared to pieces like Bishops. Pawns are difficult for a Knight to destroy, so it is a good strategy to be aggressive with a Knight as early in the game as possible. When the opposing King is protected though castling, a Knight is one of the few pieces that can check it without having to take another piece.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight_(chess)
Published by J G Hodnette
J G Hodnette is a student of English at Auburn University who enjoys writing. He enjoys watching and reviewing movies so that others will be able to use their precious free time wisely. View profile
- Blood Death Knight Vs. Destruction Warlock A guide for a blood death knight to beat a Destruction Warlock.
- Playing in a Chess Simul: Tips for Creating a Trouble-free Game 'Simul' is short for simultaneous, and means that one person will play multiple chess boards at the same time. Simultaneous exhibitions have been around for years and years, and they never seem to get any less enterta...
- Blood Death Knight Vs. Combat Rogue A guide for a blood death knight to beat a Combat Rogue.
-
Chess Strategies for the Beginner
Learning chess doesn't have to be a traumatic experience. Check out these simple tips on how to start taking your game to the next level!
- How to Make Minor Pieces a Major Part of Your Chess Game: Bishops Vs. Knights Traditionally, both knights and bishops have been given a value of three pawns. However, depending on the situation, one piece can be much better than the other.
- Three Chess Tips that Will Change Your Game for Good!
- 5 Tips to Pawns in Chess
- 5 Tips for Bishops in Chess
- 5 Tips on How to Win in Chess
- How to Play Chess - a Few Tips
- Getting Ahead in Chess
- Blood Death Knight Vs. Affliction Warlock
|
|
2 Comments
Post a CommentThe value of knights and bishops could certainly go either way. It depends on who you are asking, so I completely respect the idea that a bishop could be worth more than a knight. As for my statement, I was referring to how a knight can check the king without being able to be blocked by placing another piece in-between the King and knight. This is true not just diagonally, as I said, but also for pieces like rooks. It works best, in my mind, however, when a bishop will diagonally block a queen, putting new pressure on the queen to retreat or be taken. This type of strategy cannot be used with a Knight. I am sorry if I did not explain this well in my article.
I don't really agree with the knight being "slightly more useful" than the bishop. Aside from the obvious generalisation this statement makes, it's generally accepted that the knight is about half a point lower in value than a bishop - even more in the endgame - and I have found this to be true in most of my games.
Also, this bit:
"Knights are the only piece that can check the King without being within a diagonal range for a counter attack"
is wrong (the rook, queen and bishop can also be out of range diagonally)
Even if this was correct, it would be meaningless - what is it supposed to mean?