We received 4 free tickets to see the movie, which we told the kids about over the weekend. They were excited to go and see the film. The problem? We needed 5. I called the theater and because it was a special screening, the seats were reserved. I could not buy a ticket to this event so someone in the family had to sit this one out. In the end, my wife took one for the team and decided that she would stay behind with the baby. The kids seemed excited to check out the movie. As we drove to The Bridge in Culver City, they saw billboards of the movie and asked questions about what it was about. I was a little surprised that they were not familiar with this Charles Dickens classic. I told them that I would answer any questions they have after the movie. And what a movie it was...
First off, there have been many versions of this film. Each with their own flare but mainly stick with the premise of the book. The flair of the 2009 version clearly is in it's use of imagery. As Scrooge zooms through the air, the visuals are stunningly beautiful, and just as vivid. The main problem I had with the film (especially for it being a Disney film) was that they used some pretty images to induce fright.
The first instance of this occurs when Jacob Marley comes to warn Scrooge. I was surprised to see that the ghost manages to unhinge it's jaw, yet there are no jokes made. My 4 year old stayed closed and whispered to me that she was a little scared. I assured her that there would be nothing to be scared of. Boy would I eat those words later...
With Marley's unhinged jaw, he went on several more minutes with a deranged face speaking to Scrooge. The loud cackling and thunderous thumping of his chains added to my little one's fright. As Marley sped away, I was surprised that still, Disney did not attempt to make the scene a little more comical. Something to assure the little ones that everything will be alright.
Then comes the ghost of Christmas past. There is something plain old freaky about it. The smile on it's face that just will not dissipate and that strange tick in it's neck that is used to break tension during moments of pause. The voice that Jim Carrey uses for this character amplifies the creepiness of it all. If a doll were to me made out of this thing, I would surely be freaked out by it.
As for the ghost of Christmas Present, the giant that sits atop the Christmas tree, with his torch blazing. I didn't have much of a problem with him, since he's made in a similar figure to that of Santa Claus, but there was the talk of death near the end of tenure that didn't sit well with me. He spoke of greed and ignorance and the children used as their symbols were that of those that belonged in a Silent Hill game and when he reiterates to Scrooge that his time has come, he laughs hysterically as his flesh withers away with each bell of the clock. Skin peeling away and when they show his feet, a clear cut image of bones and death were left in his wake. Death...
The ghost of Christmas Future was clearly meant to be made in the splitting image of Death. Shadowy figure that does not speak, bony fingers protrude it's clock, and he rides in a chariot pulled by demon horses from hell. Nothing is made humorous this ghost. He clearly intends to take Scrooge to hell and makes that known when a coffin surrounded by the flames of hell is sitting under Scrooge as he dangles, barley holding on to Death's finger. And again, no comic relief during the frantic chase or the cold stares from Death.
Overall the movie was well made. I greatly enjoyed this new take on a classic tale. While the majority of the remakes focus on the feel good outcome of the story, this version made the journey that Scrooge undertook be the main attraction. When I mentioned to my wife how the movie played out, she rightly commented that the story itself is not a feel good story, but more of a man that has gotten a chance for deliverance. It was refreshing to see the story at it's true form, but I am not sure if it's something that kids will be able to digest at first viewing. My kids liked the film but their first comments about it where of those that spooked them. If you're in for a true to form version of A Christmas Carol, then I highly recommend this film. If you're in for a cutesy version, that may scare some younger children, you may want to check out a different take on this wonderful classic. Later!
Published by Metallman
I'm Metallman. Who are you? View profile
- Favorite Holiday Movies: A Christmas Carol (1999)"A Christmas Carol" is a classic holiday movie based on the story by Charles Dickens. My favorite movie adaptation is the 1999 version starring Patrick Stewart as Ebenezer Scrooge.
- The Role of the Hand of the Ghost of Christmas yet to ComeAn analysis of Charles Dickens' use of the Ghost of Christmas Future's hand to provide commentary on the elasticity of the future in relation to the elasticity of the human heart in A Christmas Carol.
- Ghosts of ChristmasA more humbug look at Christmas
- Ghost of Christmas FutureNightmares of Christmas in the future.
- Disney's Christmas Carol Train Tour Visits OmahaDisney's Christmas Carol Train Tour is touring the nation. Read this article to see why I think you should go.
- The Four Best Movie Versions of "A Christmas Carol"
- The Muppet Christmas Carol
- Top 10 "A Christmas Carol" Films
- Walt Disney Has a Winner with the 3D a Christmas Carol
- Top 7 Animated a Christmas Carol Films from Flintstones, Micky, Bugs to Ghostbusters
- "A Christmas Carol" Movies
- The Top Five Movie Versions of "A Christmas Carol"
- A true rendition of a classic tale
- May be a little frightening for small children



