A Criminal Investigation of the Obama Administration Called For

D. Calhoun
The Obama Administration's greedy lust for political power is the real reason behind the worst environmental attack of our century in the Gulf of Mexico. This is evidenced by the 19 million dollars the Fascist Imperial Regime received from their cronies in the oil industry. It is known that the Federal Government deliberately waited an appalling 9 days before responding to the drilling platform explosion. Meanwhile, the Obama Machine sent out talking points to their minions claiming the government was "pre-positioned from Day One." Pre-positioned can be defined as sitting on one's hands while doing nothing. Within sound-bite seconds, this propaganda devolved into the bold face lie parroted by the Mainstream Press, that the government was "in position from day one," dropping the "pre-position" non-sense. "In-position" here means: in port refusing to authorize the implementation of the government's existing emergency response plan that actually should have been activated from "Day One, " as well as refusing Europe's offer to send specialized maritime assets, and refusing to allow Louisiana to build protective sand bars.

However, this is only the tip of the ice berg of possible criminal actions overseen by Obama. Critics are now suggesting that it was possibly a deliberately set explosion, planned by the Obama administration, to gin up public opposition to the oil drilling initiative he placed into motion as a pay back to the oil corporations' campaign contributions. All of President Barack Hussien Obama's administration's phone records need to be seized by the FBI so that these serious criminal charges can be thoroughly investigated.

It is questioned if the timing of the oil drilling platform explosion was deliberately coordinated with the government's deliberately failed covert bombing attempt at Times Square. Not only was it timed to divert attention from the oil explosion, but it was hoped to fool the American public into thinking that the Muslim Terrorists in this country are a mere minority of inept fools, so that we will drop our guard to make way for a new onslaught of attacks on our country, thus allowing the Muslim World to teach us a serious lesson. Part of this plan would be the Administrations allowing Iran to obtain nuclear strike capability, unfettered.

If you need any further proof that the government lies to the American public to influence political power, note that Democrat political operative Mayor Blumeberg, instantaneous claim that the Times Square incident was caused by someone opposed to the government taker over of health care! The very next day it is shown that the (big surprise) Muslim-American would be bomber personally imported his bomb-making techniques, ideology, and marching orders from Pakistan. Weather the Pakistani connection was true Al Qaida or direct White House operatives is unknown at his point.

If any part of this article seems the least bit improbable or unfair, I wouldn't know why. These are the very same type accusations were leveled by the Democrats and reported as the news by the Mainstream Press during the entire eight years of the Bush Administration.

4 Comments

Post a Comment
  • D. Calhoun5/4/2010

    Thank you for your comments. You make sound arguments. Still, there were 19 million in democrat dollar reasons why regulations and investigations probably were not done before the explosion, when it could have prevented the ecological assault. I believe it was James Carvel (D) who believed that the seriousness of the charge is more important than the existence of evidence.

  • Nolan O'Brian5/4/2010

    No. Good police work led to the arrest of a suspect in the Times Square incident. Similar investigation needs to be done on British Petroleum, Halliburton, and the lax enforcement of drilling regulations when the leaking well was built and licensed.

  • D. Calhoun5/4/2010

    You are absolutely right. I learned everything I know from the Mainstream Press. But, don't you think that the "seriousness of the charge" rather than the existence any evidence, warrants an investigation"?

  • Nolan O'Brian5/4/2010

    Further proof? You offer no evidence whatsoever, merely conspiracy conjecture. This is rubbish. British Petroleum failed to include basic safety mechanisms on its rig. Your Times Square fairy tale is a joke.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.