A Few Misconceptions About the Great Michael Jordan

Steve
Michael Jordan was great, in fact, he may be the greatest and most influential sports icon we've seen, and will probably ever see in our lifetime. But there are things that people say about him that really bug me. I really need to get some of these things about him out there. I see or hear many of these statements from message boards, chartrooms, and any other place on the Internet where you can find some kid, who thinks he knows everything about the sport, and will defend to the death even some of the most trivial things about Jordan, but I highly doubt they were even old enough to even see or remember Jordan in his prime. Some of these things I just hear from conversations with my colleagues, and some I hear from highly respected sports writers, who I would think have better knowledge on the subject. But I guess they're just as nostalgic about Jordan, as some of those kids out there. So here are a few misconceptions about Jordan I took the liberty on setting straight.

Jordan Learned how to make his teammates better, and that's why the Bulls started to win championships
I'm sorry to say it(actually, I'm not), but. Jordan was doing basically what he did from the beginning of his career. His game changed a little, but that was really only so that Scottie Pippen could fit more into the offense. His ability to make his teammates better is terribly overrated. They started to win championships because of addition of that addition of Pippen, who is probably the greatest small forward of all time behind Larry Bird, Phil Jackson and his implementing of the triangle offense, and of course those great role players they had on those Bulls teams, who conveniently nobody seems to mention too much. Tony Kukoc, Horace Grant, and Dennis Rodman just to name a few. Dennis Rodman was a hall of fame caliber player in his career, being maybe the best rebounder of our time. He may have gotten there too, if he had just stayed in the league a little longer, and was just a little less insane.

Michael Jordan made his teammates better, right? Then why did Pippen, Grant, and B.J. Armstrong have their best seasons when Jordan was out for basically two straight seasons. Those being the 93-94 season where he played no games, and the 94-95 season where he only played 17. In the 1994 season where Jordan didn't play, Horace Grant and B.J. Armstrong made their one and only appearances to the all-star game, Scottie Pippen had his best season and was 3rd in MVP voting, and the Bulls managed to win 55 games. Now I don't know how Jordan did it, but he somehow managed to make his teammates better even without playing one game that whole season.

Michael Jordan is the greatest, or a top 5 perimeter defender the league has ever seen.
Jordan's defensive legacy is cemented by the fact that he could average 1 block, and 3 steals in a season. That was great, we hadn't seen that before, but what is supposed to be looked at is ability to lock down a player, not how many steals and blocks they pick up. But if you want to go ahead and believe that it is, then yes he was a top 5 defender, but if you look at what's really important, one on one defense, Jordan wasn't top 5. He was great, especially considering he exerted so much energy offensively, but not top 5.

There are two problems with the theory that he was such a great defensive player . One being, most of Jordan's career, Scottie Pippen was doing all the guarding of elite players, Pippen is the one who came out there and locked down Magic in the Finals. How can you call someone the greatest at something if they aren't even doing it that much?

The second being, even when he was playing by himself, there simply weren't many great scorers at his position for him to guard, And I can remember several occasions when he got lit up by scorers like Adrian Dantley and Dominique Wilkins. Not saying that he was suppose to stop them, considering they were great offensive players, but it's not like their games changed when they would play against Jordan.. He didn't have to go through what Bruce Bowen, and Ron Artest, (who are better one on one defenders then Jordan) go through, where virtually every team has a star scorer who can put up 40 or 50 points. And one on one, it was somewhat easier to guard a player because they weren't given as much freedom as they are today by the league. You put Ron Artest and Bowen in the league back in the day, and they would give hell to some of the top scorers of the 80's, including Jordan. Michael Jordan , was a good one on one defender, I never have considered him anything more then that, he could give some games where he'd lock down the opposing guy, but if I'm looking at his career as a whole(minus his run with the Wizards), he just wasn't a top 5 one on one defender.

Michael Jordan is the Greatest Dunker of All time
There was a recent special on TV. On this special they counted down the best dunkers of All time. Guess who was picked number 1? You guessed it, Michael Jordan of course. But why? This is really quite mind-boggling for me, considering Jordan is, to me, the most overrated dunker of all time. He jumped high, really high actually, it looked like he was floating at times, but that's where it stops. Most of his dunks, he just got really high , high enough to where he would slam it down hard on people, or jump from the free-throw line. But that's where it stops. he didn't have the creativity many other dunkers had or have, such as Dominique Wilkins and Vince Carter, who are the only two players who should be in the conversation for greatest dunker's ever. The great dunker's in the NBA now, are better dunker's then Jordan ever was. Josh Smith for instance, and even Andre Iguodala. Jordan's dunks got more praise and recognition for one reason, and one reason only, he's Michael Jordan. If he was anyone else, nobody would consider him in the top ten dunker's of all time. And nobody would call me crazy for not considering him as a top 10 dunker.

Really, there are many dunkers out there that I believe are much better then Jordan was. If you go and look at a few of the many videos out there of dunks on the Internet by players like Andre Iguodala, Kobe Bryant, Vince Carter, Josh Smith, Shawn Kemp, Dominique Wilkins, and Jason Richardson, and then look at dunks by Jordan, I guarantee that you will rethink your stance on how great of a dunker Jordan was.

Published by Steve

Just living life.  View profile

  • Michael Jordan's ability to make his teammates better is overrated
  • Michael Jordan's one on one defensive ability is overrated
  • Michael Jordan is not a top 10 dunker of all time
In the 1993-1994 season, Jordan didn't play a single game, yet the Bulls still managed to win 55 games, Scottie Pippen was a top MVP candidate, and B.J. Armstrong and Horace Grant made the all-star game for the one and only times in their career.

11 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Sean3/9/2011

    This guy is an idiot! Don't bother reading his dribble.

    Michael Jordan will always be the greatest player to ever play the game, period. He changed the game.

    The stars of the game today are just trying to be like Michael, they are trying to mimic the man, Michael.. command the scoring, be a profile in the league.

    But they will never be like Michael.

    Steve is obviously not a fan of basketball.

    Don't ever dis the man Michael again.

  • jimdags2/5/2011

    stupid article steve...get a life...i bet u dont knw to play ball...

  • subarban-BULL Fan11/5/2010

    and another thing "twit" ,..had JORDAN not retired ,.. houston-rockets would NOT have won those 2 between their run !!! BET ON THAT "twat"!!!!

  • subarban-BULL Fan11/5/2010

    is this idiot who wrote this article serious?? Does he get paid for this?? Hey buddy,...i watched JORDAN since college!! How many hall of famers do NOT have a ring because of him?? answer that einstien!! Ewing, Barkley, Miller ,Malone, Stockton,.Drexler,.Payton,...the list goes on and on...too many,..that the names escape my mind. SO,...how many others in a "dilutted" league have denied others their chance at greatness?? MJ played at the PRIME of the BEST competition that there EVER was and EVER will be!!

  • Brandon Lee6/4/2010

    3) My list of best 3 dunkers ever in their prime. (Dunk contest, not in game)

    1. Vince Carter 1998-2001 - Best dunk contest ever and he followed it up by jumping over a 7 Footer in the Olympics. http://www.loudsportsshorts.com/basketball/dunks/vince_carter_dunks.jpg

    2. Jason Richardson - 2000-2004 He once missed a dunk that if he had made it would have been the first ally oop to yourself, between the legs 360 degree tomahawk dunk ever. You know he made this dunk in practice and I wish I was there to see it... http://cache3.asset-cache.net/xc/81370071.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA5482771F2BC16EB5069A5C84E4D85A1EB82DBC695A64906D687

    3. Michael Jordan- 1985-1990 Of all three of the players I have listed, The best "IN GAME" dunker of all is Michael Jordan. He dunked on more centers than any other Player this side of Shaq 1999-2002. I am ranking my top three based on their performance in Slam Dunk contests, but realize that when it came to in game dunk

  • Brandon Lee6/4/2010

    thought possible. That is where people say Michael brought out the best in his teammates.

    #2) If you are thnking about the title run from 1996-97-98 than your remarks are correct. A mid 30's Michael Jordan who still was a great defender, often deffered to in my opinion the best defender in the league at that time, Scottie Pippen. Lets not forget that the shot that most defines Michael 1998 in Utah would have never happened if he hadnt first stripped the ball from Karl Malone-1998 regular season mvp. His most defining moment began with defense. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYx6AsanW8U

  • Brandon Lee6/4/2010

    Steve, I just want to thank you for taking the time to write this piece. We all are entitled to a point of view, and it is interesting to hear your point of view. FYI, I am a die hard Piston's fan in my early 30's(The Anti Jordan era).

    My thoughts on your post...

    point #1) The way he made his teamates better was similar to what Kobe is doing this season with Ron Artest. Ron is listening to Kobe and Phil, has gotten in better playing shape, and has controlled his fragile psychological state because of the admiration and respect that Kobe commands, as well as his leading by example through outworking the competition. The team embodies the traits of its leader. With as much credit as I give Kobe for his hard work and his skills, MJ was on a different planet than this when it came to player admiration, respect, and other people trying to please him. With that said, it is easy to see "how" he made his team better. He often willed himself and his team to acomplish more than was though

  • ed6/3/2010

    Not top 5!!! 3 on 1 ad michael wins. Happened numerous times. How would you call that. Not makig players better?? How many championships where won without Michael?? NONE.

    Dunking, take a look again at the old footage and maybe you'll come to grips that he defined most off todays dunks!!

  • Chase9/18/2009

    Of course the other players had to fill the big gaping hole Jordan left. And your one on one defense thing, people criticize Jordan for his being to individual on offense and then try to do the same injustice on d. Block and rebounds the whole team had to worry and that is what elevates him, but I do agree not top 5. Dunks, you say just because he was MJ but they were recognized before then. Vince is great but Nique was not as creative so Jordan not being as creative is just an era thing of course new guys add twist to what the old guys did. Personally, Nique and VC were the same primarily power. Jordan and McGrady were more visually spectacular. To me MJ and McGrady's dunk were more pleasing to the eye. I preferred McGrady in that dunk contest too but Kenny gave that to VC before it ever started I mean at least let the guys dunk first. That was the mosthype influenced thing I have ever witnessed.

  • GhiaElcid3/13/2009

    you just wasted my time reading your article. what a stupid point of view. i'm really sorry for you.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.