The attempted bombing that occurred on Christmas day of 2009 brought about many alarms for people. The bomber had brought on board non-metallic items that turned out to be explosives. He was caught by a couple of crew members and a passenger when they saw what he was doing with the items and then they tackled him and secured him. The airport in Schiphol has now full body scanners on flights to the US only. The United States denied these scanners earlier because they wanted them on all flights and Schiphol denied the request. After the attack, it was agreed upon to have it for the US flights only.
This all has put people on the edge of their seats when it comes to air travel, including me. I never had an issue with the routine searches that were performed before. Although, over the past couple of years they have grown increasingly annoying. I have yet to book my flight back over to the Netherlands for a visit since the scanners were installed. To me, they are taking security a bit too far.
If they want to increase the security of passengers on airplanes and in airports they need to have less carry-on luggage allowed. This still will not detour the bad guys, but maybe it would annoy them enough to stop them for a little while. An air flight is expensive as it is, even more so during holiday season. If adding scanners makes it even more expensive I can see air travel getting slower. Our economy is bad enough as it is. I, like everyone else, do not want to be blown up in an airplane, but I think there has to be other ways.
The searches and questioning that occur when traveling abroad is headed into the direction of prison searches. If you have seen one of those movies where they do full body searches, these scanners are almost to that point. Another down side to the full body scanner is the fact that I do travel with children. I do not want some TSA Officer oogling my child from head to toe. I realize my child won't be harmed, but it is just the point of it.
So if we were allowed to vote on whether to use these scanners, I vote a big no. They would not stop someone from bringing some type of explosive onto an airplane and they would cause air travel to become too expensive for the economy these days.
The Contributor has no connection to nor was paid by the brand or product described in this content.
Published by Lisa Jones
I love to read and even more love to write. If there is something to learn out there I am up to my elbows in it. Researching just about everything is only one of my many interests. View profile
Air Travel: What You Cannot Take on the PlaneA year ago, I wrote an article called Air Travel: "What Can I take on the Plane?" Of the dozens of follow up questions asked, the best question had to be, "What can I NOT take...- Holland's Schiphol Airport to Use Full-Body ScannersPrivacy concerns have magically evaporated in the wake of the attempted Christmas airline bombing...
- Tips for Air Travel with ChildrenThis articles offers helpful hints for air travel with infants and toddlers.
- Janet Napolitano Admits There was Airline Security Failure in Terrorist AttackThis article is about Janet Napolitano admitting there was a lapse in airline security.
Flight Attendant's Top Tips for Hassle-Free Air Travel with KidsIf the prospect of juggling children and carry-on bags through security, restrooms, and narrow aisles on oversold planes is enough to make you rethink taking a family vacation,...
- Full Body Scanners: Nobody Will See You Naked
- A Reticent Proposition - Solving the Security Problem on Airlines
- Full-Body Scanners Coming to an Airport Near You: A New but False Sense of Security
- Dutch Employ "Full Body Scan" when Boarding Flights with U.S. Blessing
- 6 Tips for Good Air Travel to Disney World
- What? Wireless Air Travel? Yeah, It's Coming Soon
- Tips for Smooth Summer Air Travel



