The problem here, is that only a select few couples, the ones smart enough to realize that the chances of same sex marriage staying legal long enough to plan a full out wedding the same way heterosexual couples take leisure in doing, were slim, and consequently rushed into marriage on June sixteenth, or very soon after, are the only gay couples allowed to be married in California.
And further more doesn't denying same sex marriages interfere with the Due Process clause, which guarantees the "fundamental freedom of Marriage"? As was the case with Loving vs. Virginia. Not the same situation, exactly, considering it was a white man and a black woman violating the Virginia ban on interracial marriage, but the case was dropped, because it was found that Virginia's law violated the Due Process clause, which, as previously stated, guarantees fundamental freedom of marriage.
Similarly, in Wisconsin, another scenario was put under scrutiny (Zablocki vs. Redhail), where people who were obligated to pay child support from a previous marriage needed to obtain court permission to marry. Again, this case was dropped, because the courts reasoned that marriage was a fundamental right, under the Equal Protections Clause.
If America has legalized interracial Marriage, and has, in these cases, defined marriage as a fundamental freedom and right, can we not legalize gay marriage?
Yes, by one definition marriage is considered a union between a man and a woman, but by another, marriage is defined simply as "the state, condition, or relationship of being married." Is it so hard for America to actually stand up and become what it claims to be? "A nation of equals"? America will not become a nation of equals, until everyone is actually guaranteed the same rights.
Until then, we shall remain a nation divided.
Published by Breana Yost
Rudolph Giuliani: To Support Gay Marriage or Not to Support Gay Marriage?Only recently Rudolph Giuliani supported gay marriage, but now, to get the Republican vote, he fully opposes it.- Massachusetts Will Not Allow a Vote on Gay Marriage BanIn a stunning victory for gay marriage advocates, the Massachusetts Legislature voted to block the citizens of Massachusetts from having a vote on a proposed amendment to the state constitution that would have ended g...
- Gay Marriage and ReligionI am embarrassed by our society's reluctance to recognize and accept gay marriage and I believe that organized religion is, at least partially, to blame.
- Maine Gay Marriage Law Repeal EffortThe Stand for Marriage Maine coalition apparently has enough signatures to get repeal of the Maine gay marriage law on the November ballot. With the current state of marriage, one has to wonder if it is worth it.
- California Gay Marriage Issue + McCain, Clinton, Obama?Check here to see my views about the California Gay Marriage decision as it might relate to McCain, Clinton, and Obama.
- Maine Voting Results 2009: Maine Gay Marriage Vote Anticipated
- 6 Arguments Against Gay Marriage that Don't Work
- Gay Marriage: Right or Wrong?
- Gay Marriage and Why This Christian Supports it
- Same Sex Marriage: Divided We Fall
- How One Vermont Family Sees the Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage
- Miss California vs. Perez Hilton (Video Links) on Same Sex Marriage on Miss USA Pa...

1 Comments
Post a CommentBreana,
Gay marriage is on its way to becoming legal. Right now its fighting itself through the state courts but eventually it will also become an issue in our U.S. Congress. Depending on if Obama is reelected - which I believe he will be - will determine just how soon it gets legalized federally.
President Obama is "evolving" you might say and in a positive way toward gay marriage. I believe he's just waiting until his second term when he doesn't have it as a political issue when November rolls around.
He might end up having another fight with the Supreme Court over it but I think he'll win that too. Though Justice Kennedy - the deciding vote - is conservative on several issues, he may come around on that one; we'll see.