Some might object to the theory for the interpretation of forces previously explicated by claiming that it explains only what forces result in and what components are involved in their operation.
These objectors would argue that there is insufficient explanation of what causes a given force to arise in the first place. Surely, an entity cannot simply spontaneously "decide" to exert a force on another. The beginning of the answer as to the cause of the force's exertion can be found in Newton's Third Law.
Surely, the greatest merit to Sir Isaac Newton's work has been the ruthless consistency that he maintained between his work as a physicist and philosophical objectivity, such that no absurdity nor any violation of common sense can be found in any of his models and discoveries. Similarly, his Third Law illustrates a cosmological implication that we observe every moment of our lives, yet which few have dared to explicitly phrase.
According to the Third Law, for every force Entity A exerts on Entity B, Entity B will exert an equal and opposite force (i.e., a force in a direction 180 degrees from that of the first force) on Entity A. There is no time gap between these two force exertions; they occur simultaneously with one another, and both forces are initiated at the same time.
This raises the question as to which entity in this pair is the agent of the force, and which entity is the one being acted upon. The answer to both questions is, both of them. A and B are both originators of the force and its recipients. The reason for why the force exists and is exerted needs not be found outside the system of the two entities in question.
The cause of all forces between two entities is the interaction of the natures of the two entities involved, nothing else. One entity does not start the interaction, and the other entity does not follow up. Such terms are inapplicable when discussing how forces come about. Rather, the initiation of a force is a single summary action, in which both entities simultaneously partake and which is caused by the combination of both entities´ properties placed in a certain spatial proximity.
In the anatomy of an action-reaction pair, one will find that two distinct forces are always involved, the force of A on B and the force of B on A. Each entity, as a result of its distinct nature, experiences a distinct force from that experienced by the other entity (though of the same magnitude), but the exertion of the forces is a process that goes both ways, a single process that, for the purpose of analyzing the effects on the participant entities, can be mentally separated into the component forces of an action-reaction pair.
Read other parts of "A Rational Cosmology" by clicking here.
Published by G. Stolyarov II
G. Stolyarov II is a science fiction novelist, independent essayist, poet, amateur mathematician, composer, author, and actuary. View profile
- A Rational Cosmology: Space-as-Relationship "Space-as-relationship" is synonymous with "distance" and "separation." It is not a thing; rather, it relies on the existence of two or more distinct entities, or a single entity capable of motion. This 12th essay of...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Impossibility of the Universe Having a Shape, Boundary,... Recent empiricist-positivist speculations have concerned whether or not the universe has a particular geometric shape. This tenth essay of "A Rational Cosmology" shows that the question is absurd, as the universe is n...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Natures and Tasks of Ontology and Cosmology This third essay of "A Rational Cosmology" makes the distinction between ontology and cosmology; it further argues for cosmology's place as a branch of philosophy rather than a branch of physics. The distinction betwe...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Universe Cannot Be Created This sixth essay of "A Rational Cosmology" explains why the universe could not have been created, either by a God or by a Big Bang. If the universe is "everything that exists," then anything that created the universe...
- A Rational Cosmology: What the Universe is and is Not The term "universe" does not denote a thing, quality, or relationship. Rather, it is the sum of all entities that exist. It is not a "whole" in the sense that a person is a "whole." This fifth essay of "A Rational Cos...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Distinction Between Physics and Cosmology
- A Rational Cosmology: The Ubiquitous Quality of Matter
- A Rational Cosmology: The Ubiquitous Qualities of Volume, Length, Width, and Height
- A Rational Cosmology: The Euclidean Line
- A Rational Cosmology: The Axioms of Existence, Identity, and Consciousness
- A Rational Cosmology: Why There is No Such Thing as Space
- A Rational Cosmology: Coordinate Systems
|
|