"Infinity" is one of the most frequently encountered terms in the contemporary culture, and one of the least understood. Too often has its invocation been an attempt to justify mysticism, irrationalism, and contradiction, especially in the natural sciences.
It is the province of philosophy, as a foundational science, to set the very framework without which the natural sciences cannot operate. Unfortunately, numerous contemporary scientists have stepped far outside their field in making generalizations about the nature of existence, and of infinity, deliberations which properly belong in the realm of philosophy and which philosophers must employ to weed absurd and contradictory statements from the natural sciences.
Reality is absolute and every existent has an identity. According to the philosophy of Objectivism, existence and identity are inextricable corollaries. To be is to be something and to be something in particular. To be something in particular means to have a set, deliberate, fathomable nature.
It is no coincidence that the word "to fathom" means both "to measure" and "to understand." In order to be understood by man, a given entity must have attributes that can be measured on some scale, be it a qualitative or a quantitative one. In order to be measurable, an entity must demonstrate a finite quantity of each measurable attribute.
A particular given entity, say, a dog, must have finite mass and length, and its fur must reflect light of a finite measurement. A concept, such as dog, is formed by omitting the particular measurements of every dog and claiming that a dog must have dog-like qualities in some quantity, but could have them in any of a range of quantities.
To claim that any dog has infinite measurements of given qualities is absurd: if something is infinite, and does not have a set, delimited quantity to be measured, how can it be measurable? If it is not measurable in some manner, absolute or relative, how can it serve as a necessary quality in the definition of a concept?
Thus, infinite, that is, limitless measurements of qualities cannot exist if concept formation is to continue to maintain its legitimacy. We shall call the coexistence of infinite and finite measurements or the presence of all infinite measurements within an entity a simultaneous infinity. Simultaneous entities are not to be found in reality; indeed, they are not even consistently conceivable to the human mind.
Using this as a foundation, we can now proceed to investigate prevalent misconceptions and faulty logic in the examination of the notion of infinity and where it is applicable.
Read other parts of "A Rational Cosmology" by clicking here.
Published by G. Stolyarov II
G. Stolyarov II is a science fiction novelist, independent essayist, poet, amateur mathematician, composer, author, and actuary. View profile
- A Rational Cosmology: The Ubiquitous Qualities of Volume, Length, Width, and Height This 14th essay of "A Rational Cosmology" considers qualities which are universal to all entities: volume, length, width, and height. It explains what these qualities are and why every entity that exists must exhibit...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Distinction Between Physics and Cosmology Cosmology is not a branch of physics, as many believe, but rather a field of philosophy. In this fourth essay of his series, "A Rational Cosmology," Mr. Stolyarov presents the essential distinction between physics and...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Impossibility of the Universe Having a Shape, Boundary,... Recent empiricist-positivist speculations have concerned whether or not the universe has a particular geometric shape. This tenth essay of "A Rational Cosmology" shows that the question is absurd, as the universe is n...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Natures and Tasks of Ontology and Cosmology This third essay of "A Rational Cosmology" makes the distinction between ontology and cosmology; it further argues for cosmology's place as a branch of philosophy rather than a branch of physics. The distinction betwe...
- A Rational Cosmology: What the Universe is and is Not The term "universe" does not denote a thing, quality, or relationship. Rather, it is the sum of all entities that exist. It is not a "whole" in the sense that a person is a "whole." This fifth essay of "A Rational Cos...
- A Rational Cosmology: A Refutation of Big Bang Theory
- A Rational Cosmology: The Axioms of Existence, Identity, and Consciousness
- A Rational Cosmology: Space-as-Relationship
- A Rational Cosmology: The Ubiquitous Quality of Matter
- A Rational Cosmology: Coordinate Systems
- A Rational Cosmology: The Euclidean Line
- A Rational Cosmology: Why There is No Such Thing as Space
|
|