Since it is impossible for any event to change the past, no entity can have the same age at a given instant in time as it did at some other temporal instant. Since the process of change is, by definition, one of change taking place, rather than annihilating the fact that it had taken place, the latter of which is impossible, any measurement pertaining to change must be positive.
Since the sum total of all changes (including mutually antagonistic changes) that have ever occurred can only accumulate, time, the quality of entities that renders change possible must, too, possess positive increments and constantly accumulate in its magnitude within every entity.
Though the three spatial dimensions have the ability to increase or decrease in their magnitude within any given entity, the fourth dimension, time, can only increase in its magnitude.
The reason why time is, too, a dimension, though not a spatial one, is the impossibility of relating any two real entities without describing some involvement of the quality, "time."
Even if we consider two spheres frozen at some set distance apart, we must still make mention of the fact that the two spheres are in such a position simultaneously, recognizing that the spheres' relationship was not merely a part of each sphere's bygone history, nor is it only possible as the spheres accumulate age (i.e. in the future).
We merely admit that there is some dimension (time) which is mentally held constant for the purposes of the present examination, as we are only observing the relationship of the spheres in one particular moment, as we had, in "The Euclidean Line", observed the relationship of real, three-dimensional boxes in only one dimension.
Were such spheres to exist, there would be no way to hold the fourth dimension constant except as a mental model! The three-dimensional boxes did not become one-dimensional simply because man used a Euclidean one-dimensional line to accurately express their relative position in terms of only the dimension, width.
Likewise, spheres with an existence in three spatial dimensions and one temporal dimension do not cease existing in the temporal dimension merely because the factor of time is beyond the scope of somebody's present observation of the spheres. In the real world, while man performs an analysis of what the spheres' spatial relationship was when the spheres each had some given age, the spheres' age continues to increase, uniformly, as the very investigation is conducted! Read other parts of "A Rational Cosmology" by clicking here.
Published by G. Stolyarov II
G. Stolyarov II is a science fiction novelist, independent essayist, poet, amateur mathematician, composer, author, and actuary. View profile
- A Rational Cosmology: A Refutation of Big Bang Theory This seventh essay of "A Rational Cosmology" exposes critical logical flaws within the basic propositions of Big Bang theory. Mr. Stolyarov notes underlying errors in the very notion of a "singularity," as well as why...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Axioms of Existence, Identity, and Consciousness An axiom is a self-verifying statement. It cannot be proved deductively, because it is, in itself, the foundation upon which all further proofs are built. This second essay in "A Rational Cosmology" explains the axiom...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Natures and Tasks of Ontology and Cosmology This third essay of "A Rational Cosmology" makes the distinction between ontology and cosmology; it further argues for cosmology's place as a branch of philosophy rather than a branch of physics. The distinction betwe...
- A Rational Cosmology: What the Universe is and is Not The term "universe" does not denote a thing, quality, or relationship. Rather, it is the sum of all entities that exist. It is not a "whole" in the sense that a person is a "whole." This fifth essay of "A Rational Cos...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Impossibility of the Universe Having a Shape, Boundary,... Recent empiricist-positivist speculations have concerned whether or not the universe has a particular geometric shape. This tenth essay of "A Rational Cosmology" shows that the question is absurd, as the universe is n...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Euclidean Line
- A Rational Cosmology: The Distinction Between Physics and Cosmology
- A Rational Cosmology: Coordinate Systems
- A Rational Cosmology: The Existence of Change and the Necessity of Time
- A Rational Cosmology: Euclidean Planes and Three-Dimensional Constructs
- A Rational Cosmology: The Universe Cannot Be Destroyed
- A Rational Cosmology: The Requirements for Homogeneous Entities
|
|