In "What the Universe is and is Not," I defined the universe as "everything that exists," a convenient shorthand for every entity that is.
If it is true that the universe is "everything that exists," and it could be created, then, whatever entity could create the universe, would be outside that universe. It follows, then, that such an entity would be outside "everything that exists." An entity "outside" existence does not exist! A non-existent entity cannot do anything. Creation is an action that an entity must perform; it cannot be performed if the entity that would perform it does not exist!
It is instructive to note that this principle automatically refutes both the theory that "God created the universe," as will be shown here, and that "the Big Bang created the universe," as will be shown subsequently.
Even if it were possible that all currently known entities were intelligently designed, they could not have been designed by a being that is somehow "beyond existence."
Rather, this being would need to be a delimited entity in its own right, with its own peculiar attributes (qualities) and capacities for action (relationships with other entities). Let the reader recall that everything which is or happens must in some manner involve some entity or entities. There are no such things as "pure" qualities, "pure" relationships, or "pure" creation, apart from the entities that exhibit, relate, and create.
Any Creator of other entities would thus need to exist and be a part of the universe, and it would need to relate to other entities in some manner, as a human creator relates to the entity, "brick," when he constructs the new entity, "building". The Creator would not be able to create the universe, the latter being a contradiction in terms.
But, in most variants of the monotheistic religions, God is not defined as an entity. As a matter of fact, God is defined precisely as a non-entity, something which does not only lack any set qualities, but which cannot possibly be understood or perceived by anyone anywhere in the universe.
God clearly fails the third corollary of identity, which states that any entity must have some relationship to everything else that exists. God also fails the first and second tests, as it is not defined what qualities God has; if God created the universe, He cannot have any qualities whatsoever, because the universe encompasses every entity that exists and thus every entity that can have qualities.
There exist numerous other arguments to refute the existence of God and the contention that "God created the universe," and it is not the purpose of this treatise to delve into them here. Suffice it to say that there has been presented one of many logical refutations to theistic cosmology.
Read other parts of "A Rational Cosmology" by clicking here.
Published by G. Stolyarov II
G. Stolyarov II is a science fiction novelist, independent essayist, poet, amateur mathematician, composer, author, and actuary. View profile
- A Rational Cosmology: The Ubiquitous Qualities of Volume, Length, Width, and Height This 14th essay of "A Rational Cosmology" considers qualities which are universal to all entities: volume, length, width, and height. It explains what these qualities are and why every entity that exists must exhibit...
- A Rational Cosmology: Coordinate Systems A coordinate system is a mental model which enables human beings to relate the positions of real entities to one another. This 15th essay of "A Rational Cosmology" explains the uses of such concepts as points but emph...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Ubiquitous Quality of Matter The ubiquitous qualities of entities are possessed by every thing that exists. Matter, the constituent quality of entities, is simply, that, which entities are made of. This thirteenth essay of "A Rational Cosmology"...
- A Rational Cosmology: Space-as-Relationship "Space-as-relationship" is synonymous with "distance" and "separation." It is not a thing; rather, it relies on the existence of two or more distinct entities, or a single entity capable of motion. This 12th essay of...
- A Rational Cosmology: The Axioms of Existence, Identity, and Consciousness An axiom is a self-verifying statement. It cannot be proved deductively, because it is, in itself, the foundation upon which all further proofs are built. This second essay in "A Rational Cosmology" explains the axiom...
- A Rational Cosmology: A Refutation of Big Bang Theory
- A Rational Cosmology: The Universe Cannot Be Destroyed
- A Rational Cosmology: What the Universe is and is Not
- A Rational Cosmology: The Natures and Tasks of Ontology and Cosmology
- A Rational Cosmology: The Distinction Between Physics and Cosmology
- A Rational Cosmology: The Requirements for Homogeneous Entities
- A Rational Cosmology: Why There is No Such Thing as Space
|
|
- Under fire, Obama adjusts his birth control policy (AP)
- Obama shift seeks to defuse birth-control fight (Reuters)
- Catholic group backs Obama birth control policy (AP)
- Catholic furor over birth control rule turns Democrats on one another (The Christian Science Monitor)
- Creator of Revolution Muslim website, inspiration to US jihadis, pleads guilty (The Christian Science Monitor)
2 Comments
Post a CommentAvinash:
Special pleading is a form of spurious argumentation where a position in a dispute introduces favorable details or excludes unfavorable details by alleging a need to apply additional considerations without proper criticism of these considerations themselves. Essentially, this involves someone attempting to cite something as an exemption to a generally accepted rule, principle, etc. without justifying the exemption.
Just as you used the definition of "Universe" to prove that universe is not created by God nor by Big Bang, We can use the definition of God to prove that God created it. Defination of God as given in all scriptures and great logicians is " One who has no cause and is the cause of all causes".
Now It is very logical to understand that , Since we are part of His creation we on our own have no Power to find the Creator. When we see a car we naturally accept that it came from a workshop created by a person. We dont say that "It has no Cause".
Now when we see the superb mechanism of conception , then few months after conception there is birth of a baby. This baby has a immediate cause i.e the father and mother, but both have no knowledge of the internal process. So they are just the means and not the original cause. Similarly you will find many intermediate causes, but the ultimate is the God(by definition). So creation has not stopped.
As men are continuously creating, even