We note well that Mel Gibson has spent a long time away from the big screen since The Singing Detective. It is interesting that he should choose a remake of a film that has been a big hit more than 25 years ago, and try to translate the message of the film to the modern era. Back then, director Martin Campbell explored a world of complicacy involving the CIA, nuclear devices and government conspiracies. It worked because it fitted with the political environment at the time, and stretched the audience's imagination and fears of nuclear weapons. The old film had a good deal of suspense, and we are attracted to the fate of the protagonist as he delves deeper and deeper into the reasons that his daughter was killed.
If you had seen the previous film, then you would probably give this a pass as this is just an exact remaked with similar plots. It is just a mere exploitation of the American market, and had none of the suspense and intricacy associated with the earlier work. From the start, the plot grinds forward at an extremely slow pace. The fact that they tried to include as much from the old film into the this remake dragged it out and made the plot overcomplex.
As the Detective was followed closely by the team from the Northmoor nuclear facility, led by Danny Huston as the security head. The only redemption was Ray Winstone, who was menacing as the clean up man hired by the team. Gibson looks miserable as ever in his role and the violence is way over the top and did nothing to propel the plot. As he physically subdued all his opponents and reached the end of his own life, we are left wondering what is the moral message of the whole story. Surely he plays the role of a grieving father who has just lost his loved one, but the whole revenge business made this just another average action flick.
Read more:
Edge of Darkness Review
Find out ways to watch movies online
Published by Henry Brooke
Henry Brooke is a popular writer for many magazines and journals. He comes from a medical background and reports on medical topics in simple and unbiased language. View profile
Mel Gibson MoviesMel Gibson returns to the big screen this month (Edge of Darkness Jan. 2010) after seven years absence from a starring role. Let's take a look of some of Gibson's best flicks- World Trade Center: Movie Review and so Much MoreA movie review and some other thoughs about Oliver Stone's World Trade Center.
- Mel Gibson Hit with Divorce RumorsMel Gibson, who hadn't been in any more personal troubles for a few years, is now rumored to be on the brink of a very costly divorce, at least according to the tabloids.
- Mel Gibson: Past Passions & Future DivorceMel Gibson is known for his bravery, but his latest dip could cost his marriage as his wife files for divorce. Learn of Mel's past passions with others and how this pie is sliced.
- Top 10 Things Overheard at Dinner with Britney Spears and Mel GibsonMel Gibson and Britney Spears had dinner Saturday, March 15th. Here are some things overheard.
- Edge of Darkness Reviews Signal Familiar Gibson Comeback
- Movie Review: Edge of Darkness (2010)
- The Book of Eli (2010) Movie Review
- Light at the Edge of the Darkness - Anthology Edited by Cynthia MacKinnon
- Mel Gibson Admits Drinking Before and After Arrest...Still Denies Hatred of Jews
- Alcohol is Not a Truth Serum: Mel Gibson and Alcoholism
- Mel Gibson Trivia




1 Comments
Post a CommentHi, Henry! We must have been posting our stories on "Edge of Darkness" about the same time, as I just posted one yesterday after seeing it here in Florida (on vacation). I, too, felt it was just sort of "meh." It isn't that it doesn't have an intricate plot or good acting; it's just that it's been done so many times before. I used the term "throwback" movie, because it seems derivative of all those vigilante vengeance movies ("Deathwish," "The Brave One," Clint Eastwood flicks) and, also, of conspiracy films ("Three Days of the Condor," "The Parallax View," "Marathon Man," "The Conspiracy Theory"). You might find some of the other stuff I found out interesting. I did get the impression from the credits that this movie was based on the BBC television series with the same name (the movie is dedicated to the writer of that series), rather than being a revisiting of a previous film with the same name, but it's likely that the earlier film you reference was (also) based on that BBC series t