Looking to history, I would argue the conquest of England in 1066 was the first attempt at installing a planned notion of government that did not evolve but was instead imposed. The Norman's took the basic organization of Saxon England and kept whatever they thought assisted them, but they installed their own Norman overlords to force compliance to all the new demands the conquerors' placed. That's why all those keeps and castles were built all over the countryside. The few Norman masters holed up in their fortresses to be protected from a very unhappy public.
The duchy's of Europe prior to the Enlightenment were more like "city states" than nations. France was a series of smaller entities - Avignon, Normandy, Burgundy and Aquitaine are some of the more well known of them. Same with Germany - a series of people who basically spoke the same language, had similar customs and sensibilities, but were not a united nation as we know them today. Europe was awash in war and rumor of war for centuries until eventually some vague semblance of what we recognize as Europe today emerged, and even since then France, England, Holland, Germany, the Austro-Hungarian Empire and all the rest have fought like cats and dogs.
Each of these states came into being from war or threatened war. Alliances were made and broken in an unending series of efforts to amalgamate. Only since England and Scotland and the Act of Union have we known a UK. Only since the end of the Hundred Years War did France become largely one nation instead of a series of duchies.
All of these nations, experienced growing pains. The English Civil War of the 1640's and the Commonwealth until the Restoration of monarchy was English struggle. The French Revolution of the late 1780's another. My point is that every nation will experience growing pains and turn against itself to some degree. The US Civil War was our bump in the road. Germany did not become one nation until 1871 and how long did that one last before it all went to Hell in a hand basket? See my point?
But only the US decided on a system and kept to that system intact and even the American Civil War did not alter the system. In fact the American Civil War was about an entirely different set of issues than were the French Revolution and the English Civil War. We all agreed the Constitution was still the guiding hand but we needed to finally decide who was supreme. Was it the individual constituencies - that states - or was the Federal government supreme? The late unpleasantness settled the issue.
The United States was unique because we did not have monarchy. We chose to empower the individual and to make clear the rights of individuals come from a higher power and not government caveat. Our uniqueness is found in our knowledge that government is to serve our needs and not the other way round. All over Europe a man was a tool of government, but not here. Our government was defined as the will of the people. We recognized that without individual liberty and autonomy all the rest was lost.
Throughout the rest of the world any freedom one might have otherwise enjoyed was entirely because of government allowing the individual to enjoy it, but not because it was their right granted by a higher power. Even Magna Carta was merely a specificity of the monarch's power, or more accurately, King John grudgingly acquiescing that the Lords and Barons had power too. It was an agreement of shared power, but it still sought to demand of the peasantry. In our nation we are not tools of government, but we are the government. That is a fine distinction and one to be remembered.
Our experiment is unique. In no other nation before us was there any concept that man was his own keeper and government was here to facilitate an individual's autonomy and exercise of liberty. That made and still makes us unique. Oh sure, today nations have framed themselves as we were, but still, they do not entrust individuals with the sole power of autonomous direction. Real and true individual liberty and consent of the governed are uniquely American ideals.
Is it any wonder trying to get individuals to move from that position is like pulling teeth? Of course in any collective group there is always a seeking of common ground and in so doing a little bit of individual liberty is sacrificed. Only in America do citizens first hold dear the concept that I make the decisions and not government, but for my willing acceptance.
Unlike the current political efforts of some, this nation was about individual liberty over all other concerns. We'd better keep that in mind if we hope to keep the unique concepts under which this nation was Constituted. Individual liberty is a precarious thing. Seems someone is always trying to find a way to shave off some, bit by bit, in their seeking whatever political endgame they imagine.
Published by Snidely Whiplash
Nuthin' of note. View profile
Opus Dei in the United StatesWhat is the truth of Opus Dei and what is their role in the United States?- Unique, Strange, and Weird Foods in the United StatesAre your taste buds in the mood for something different? Try some of these unique foods found in different parts of the United States.
- How Many People Are in the United States?How many people are in the United States of America, with what the current population is and real-time clocks of figures, numbers, estimates, and projection of how many live and work in the U.S.
Why the United States Will Fall to Second-World Status in the Next 50 Ye...The United States is likely to fall to second-world status in the next 50 years if it can't get its social problems under control and here's why.- Canadians Establishing Credit in the United StatesWant a US bank account? Are you a Canadian looking for a way to establish credit in the United States? This article will show some tips.
- Great Inventions Courtesy of the United States Government
- The Biggest Money Machine Ever, in World History, is the Government of the United...
- An Overview of the Non Profit Sector in the United States
- An Evolving Democracy: The United States
- Introduction to Enlightenment Thought and the French Revolution
- Why is Soccer Not Popular in the United States?
- Female Circumcision in the United States




6 Comments
Post a CommentMy goodness, Patricia. Have you been so deceived as to forget that we are also the last bastion of freedom on this planet? The nation was founded upon ideals of individual liberty, not so that we can be just another nation full of boot-licking, mindless slaves, feeding parasites in office. You might be tricked into believing you'll reap the rewards along with your boss when liberty is dead, but you won't. Sorry girlie. You're not one of the elite, any more than I. You have been duped by the manipulation of your deep-seated (deep-seeded?) fears and insecurities.
Agreed with your point Tricia, although I would not describe it as "flawed" so much but designed so we could address future issues. If 2/3rds of the nation agree, then amended it is. The hue and cry is reasonable though. We must follow the law...all of them, all the time. If 2/3rd's of the nation want something bad enuff, we'll amend it. If not, we can't just go on doing it. "Unconstitutional" is a valid cry when something is. Just b/c some want something does not make it reason why the Constitution can be ignored. Amend it legally, or if something is unconstitutional it will remain so, and if that's the case we cannot do it then. That is the very foundation of this nation and law in general.
Very nice. The general public definitely needs to remember this.
Compared to the rest of the world, the US is a baby nation. As for "going back to our roots," let's not forget that that Constitution has had to be amended 27 times. That's why I don't get all this hue and cry about stuff being "unconstitutional." A good look at the constitution has been taken and it's "flaws" corrected 27 times. Who's to say that more amendments aren't needed?
"Individual liberty is a precarious thing." Amen, Jimbo.
As I mentioned already in your last article's comments, I was so encouraged yesterday when the Congress began by reading the Constitution in its entirety :) It's back to our roots, cheers ;)