SB 1878 proposes that an ultrasound must be performed, by law, before any operation is even in the paperwork. The woman could then choose to watch or look away while the doctor says: "No one can force you to have an abortion." He has to say this, by law, and so does a sign with bold font outside his/her practice door.
The bill, under review by Governor Brad Henry will give health care workers the right to refuse to assist in an abortion if it conflicts with their moral or religious beliefs. Also, this bill does not offer any indication that pregnancies caused by rape or incest should be given special consideration.
The bill aims to curb or alleviate a woman's ability to have an abortion, which has been criticized heavily by a number of groups including the National Partnership for Women & Families. It's unclear whether or not this will have a positive effect on Oklahoma. That is a matter up for open debate. But here in Oklahoma, where Christianity has a cultivated following, it's likely that hot-button issues such as abortion and gay marriage will be addressed religiously and not politically.
Senator Todd Lamb, (Rep.) of my hometown of Edmond supports the bill:
"I am encouraged by the bipartisan support to protect innocent life today in the senate." Lamb says on Oklahoma's government website. "The provisions spelled out in this legislation are critical pro-life advances..."
Others aren't so quick to agree, like Sen. Jeff Rabon (D), who told the Advisory Board Company that the measure "would dehumanize and humiliate women." Several blogs, including Blue Oklahoma, agrees insisting that the bill "shatters the boundary between the conscience of the health care provider and the conscience of the patient..." by providing legal clemency to doctors who fail to perform an abortion correctly. At the same time the bill interferes with a doctor's practice by implementing provisions that restrict the type of medicine he or she can use on a patient. In this way, the bill seems to work in favor of Christian doctors and against those who may disagree.
It's uncertain how the bill will turn out over the next couple of days, but if Governor Henry decides to veto the bill, Oklahoma lawmakers will likely try again at another session or possibly override Gov. Henry's veto altogether.
Published by Robert Cole
I work, write and live in Oklahoma. I read and write poetry along with short fiction, essays, general interest and literary reviews. View profile
Gay Marriage and Why This Christian Supports itIn this essay, I argue why I support gay marriage, even though I am a Christian. I argue on the separation of church and state, as well as the fallibility of mankind.- Gay Marriage: Right or Wrong?Gay marriage is something of a new idea, yet gay love has been taboo for centuries. Just recently has it become a legal issue, even as homosexual behavior has become commonplace in our society.
6 Arguments Against Gay Marriage that Don't WorkMany social conservatives oppose homosexuals' rights to gay marriage. Here are the reasons they give, as well as some easy logic that debunks those reasons.
Rudolph Giuliani: To Support Gay Marriage or Not to Support Gay Marriage?Only recently Rudolph Giuliani supported gay marriage, but now, to get the Republican vote, he fully opposes it.- Iowa Supreme Court Sanctions Gay MarriageWithin the next 20 days or so, gay marriage will become legal in the state of Iowa. The Iowa Supreme Court unanimously decided that a 1998 law banning gay marriage is unconstitutional.
- Red River Army Depot's Fate a Hot-Button Issue in Texarkana, Texas
- Gay Marriage and Religion
- California Gay Marriage Issue + McCain, Clinton, Obama?
- Maine Gay Marriage Law Repeal Effort
- It's Inevitable: Gay Marriage Will Be Legal in All 50 States Within 20 Years
- Massachusetts Will Not Allow a Vote on Gay Marriage Ban
- Cindy McCain Defends Gay Marriage and Joins the NOH8 Campaign

2 Comments
Post a CommentNice balanced point of view. This one will put Brad Henry in a tough spot if he ever has any national political aspirations.
I believe that every woman should have a choice.. Although I would never get an abortion, I would gladly take the hand of my friend as she did... Taking away that choice will just bring back dirty doctors to do the job instead. Great article