I think that promoting abstinence is one of the most important elements of a comprehensive sex education. While I agree that some teenagers are going to have sex no matter what they do, the figures and personal knowledge of friends' experiences leads me to agree that most teenagers wish that they had waited longer to have had sex. Abstinence and its emotional and physical benefits can be presented without condemning those who do choose to partake in sexual activity. It would also be important to avoid overemphasizing marriage, since gay and lesbian teens cannot get married yet; and rather just concentrate on abstinence until older, more mature, marriage, or a committed relationship. Without selling rings, membership to a club, or scaring kids into submission, abstinence could be supported even more strongly when taught more effectively within a comprehensive sex education curriculum.
In addition to promoting abstinence as a choice instead of providing false information and facts to push abstinence as the only option, comprehensive sex education should cover more topics aside from the scare factors of gross STDs. Oral and anal sex are growingly more popular in "abstinent" and sexually active teens and these subjects must be addressed, especially since they often carry little known diseases as well. Masturbation is healthy and normal, and should be discussed in the classroom setting especially when teaching kids how to deal with hormonal urges outside of sexual activity.
The final, overarching theme that is crucial for any effective sexual education class is open discussion, acceptance, and awareness. I feel that bringing in a young mother or father to discuss how her or his life has changed is effective, and eye opening. However, it is important to allow kids to ask anonymous questions or have a mentor to speak to as well as making knowledge about contraception available. By using scare tactics in comprehensive sex ed or blanketing it with a biased religious cure-all (that doesn't work) in abstinence only sex ed, we are only spreading more confusion and hypersensitivity about the issue. Young teenagers are getting ready to operate motor vehicles, work jobs, and have real relationships, and we should give them the most honest, accurate, and up to date information about sex and related issues to promote intelligent, healthy decision making.
Published by Sgaringer
I would define myself as a poor college student who likes to write. Hopefully someone will like to read what I like to write aside from my professors. View profile
The Case for Comprehensive Sex Education in SchoolsComprehensive sex education is the only kind of sex education that belongs in our schools. There is no place for religion-derived, abstinence-only programs. - Effects of Abstinence-only Based Sex Education from a College Freshman's ViewpointMost teenagers seem to closely link sexuality with actually having sex, which alone is a forgivable mistake, yet the less justifiable error is how abstinence-only sexual education classes in public schools all too oft...
- The Just Say No Approach: Do Abstinence-only Programs Work?Discussing the good and bad of abstinence education.
- Do Abstinence-only Programs Work?Highlights several different abstinence-only programs and the findings for each.
- Sex Education and Right Wing ReligionA research paper on the events of 1968 in the public school system in Anaheim, California. The paper details the topic of sex education and the public school system when religion gets involved.
- Why Abstinence-Only Sex Education Fails
- Sex Education
- Teen Sex-Ed Debates: Abstinence Only Vs. Comprehensive Sex Education
- Sex Education: Why Teach Abstinence Only?
- Funding, Ideologies, Consequences and Implications of Abstinence-Only Sex Educatio...
- Is Abstinence-Only Education Useless?
- Sex Education: Another Bush Administration Fund Misallocation

