Academy Award Nominated Film Gasland' Stirs Pocono Controversy

Anthony Ventre
When the documentary film "Gasland" was nominated for an Academy Award, it was bound to stir controversy in Pennsylvania. The state struggles with a $4 billion budget deficit, crumbling infrastructure, ancient gas pipeline explosions and 9 percent unemployment.

Taxation of the Marcellus natural gas drilling is still a political issue which has yet to be sorted out. Luckily, new Republican Gov. Tom Corbett hasn't uttered those too often heard words: "The mess we inherited."

The issue of how much to tax the industry perplexed departing Gov. Ed Rendell and remained unresolved when he left office. Republicans and Democrats favored a tax but were widely apart on the amount of such a tax.

Opinion among Democrats was generally that it should be "taxed to death" as some Republicans would describe it. In that case, drillers would likely move to other locations in the band of states that comprise the Marcellus Shale deposits. The Marcellus Shale rock shelf extends from parts of New York state, down through Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia.

"Gasland" is destined to become the filmic version of a battle flag for enviro-radicals. The comments section of a news article about the film documentary urges people to get involved in the fight against natural gas drilling companies.

"Kelly Zimmerman" implies that pro-drilling advocates are transmitting computer viruses to those "involved in the natural gas drilling fight." The right course of action is to "pull an Egypt on them and get a million people to march."

At the same time, it's impossible to find anyone in the industry who is not concerned that drilling operations should be conducted in an environmentally friendly manner. All human activity has an impact on the environment, from housing septic systems to the installation of electrical lines.

It is the rare environmental activist who does not use electricity or carbon fuel energies. Indeed, noted environmental activists like former Vice President Al Gore are often criticized for large, energy consuming mansions and private planes.

Industry operators and state officials are accountable for any damage caused by drilling. But the science of drilling is much improved compared to when "fracking" began in the middle of the last century.

"Fracking" is the slang term used for the technique of forcing fluids and air into drilled holes so as to fracture the shale rock containing natural gas.

The "Gasland" documentary is one of the latest in a spate of films actively editorializing for a left-liberal point of view. Documentary filmmakers of earlier periods were often frustrated in their quest for "objectivity." Many modern filmmakers have entirely abandoned objectivity and routinely combine political activism with filmmaking, in the manner of Cuban socialist films of the 1960s.

Michael Moore is likely the best known documentary filmmaker in the modern genre which is saturated with opinion. "Gasland" invites comparison with Michael Moore's anti-gun documentary "Bowling for Columbine," and with Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth."

"Gasland" competes with the other four nominated films in the "Documentary Feature" category:

Restrepo: Named after a battle casualty in the Afghan war, the film tracks the lives of young war fighters on the battlefield.

Exit Through the Gift Shop: a fanciful, partly true documentary on the life of a British street artist named "Banksy."

Inside Job: a look into the fast-paced world of Wall Street and the role "creativity" played in the world financial collapse.

Waste Land: Brazilian trash artist Vik Muniz highlights people who scrape a living from items discarded at a garbage dump.

For more Oscars buzz, go to Oscars.yahoo.com

Anthony Ventre is a freelance writer who has written for several weekly and daily newspapers, for Demand Studios, and for AOL. He lives in Stroudsburg, Pa., and writes about topics impacting the tri-state area.

Published by Anthony Ventre

I have a background in traditional print media and radio news. The proliferation of online writing opportunities has changed things for me, largely for the better. News moves quickly in the information a...  View profile

9 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Snidely Whiplash3/20/2011

    Why don't we just use fracking on the libs? Drill holes in them to force fluids and air so as to fracture their obtuse little brains in hopes of forcing out the stupid? Good idea, no?

  • Fern Fischer3/7/2011

    I'm glad you called this film to our attention. And you're correct about alternative energy production. As long as we consume, we create demand and a market. We still need to provide short-term energy needs while intelligent, alternative long-term sources are being developed. Some of the blitherers need to turn their attention to speeding up development of replacement energy sources.

  • Sheryl Young3/4/2011

    So we sit here with environmentalist banning American drilling, while we allow other countries to drill near our shores and reap the benefits, and while we are still held in bondage by foreign oil. Thanks a bunch!

  • Robert O. Adair2/28/2011

    Very interesting!

  • Michele Starkey2/27/2011

    There is a whole lot of controversy here in the Hudson Valley of NY over "fracking" under the Stewart Park Lands (right next to Stewart Int'l Airport) The DEC has approved the fracking and the SPARC (Stewart Park and Reserve Coalition) is fighting it. I don't think we know enough about what it will do to the Fault under the earth and since the fault runs straight thru the Hudson Valley down to NYC. cheers

  • Deb2/26/2011

    Spin much?
    I guess you don't practice that form of journalism that calls for objectivity either.

  • Anthony Ventre2/26/2011

    Actually, I just got back from watching a screening of the film. The director, Joshua Fox, was not the environmental whacko I expected and the film does raise some legitimate questions. They had him hooked up to a live feed in hisl living room or hotel room in LA--wherever.

    All the environmental whackos were in the audience, though--it was scary. Every time a Republican anybody came on camera, there was widespread hissing and booing so you couldn't hear what they said.

    It was a zillion times better than Michael Moore. Of course, the criticisms were in some cases justified but then all they can do is come up with the usual answers, like we're all going to hook up sails or solar panels on our cars. All that alternative energy stuff can do is produce maybe 1 or 2 percent of what we use every day-- If it was so great it would be self-supporting .

    Though it was a one-sided presentation, it was at least a reasonably honest one-sided presentation. The truth is som

  • Major Jester2/26/2011

    Was not aware of this. Thank you for the very informative article.

  • Valerie Ferrari2/26/2011

    Very informative, Anthony :-)

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.