The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Science's Board of Governors voted to change the rule in order to insert a little more surprise into the process. Since the actual awards show is aired after every other movie awards show has indicated who the winners will be long before the envelope is opened, the number of films receiving nominations for Best Picture may be the only surprise left at the Oscars.
The new rule mandates that only movies that receive at least 5% of the nominating votes will receive a nod for Best Picture. The upside is that this means that some movies that should never be nominated for Best Picture in this or any other realm will not get in on the act simply because the show must fill out 10 slots. The downside is that there are still likely to be movies that get nominated that just simply aren't one of the best movies of the year. Of course, as "Titanic" proved, even a movie that wins a tiebreaking number of Oscars under the old rules isn't necessarily one of the best movies of the year.
The application of this new rule change to the nominating process of the past few years reveals that 10 nominations for Best Picture based on voting merit seems to be a pipedream. From 2001 to 2008, the number of movies that would have received a Best Picture nomination, respectively, are 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. Then again, at this rate, it would seem that next year might see as many as 13 films nominated. Heh -- funny -- the idea that 13 movies made in any year in the past decade would be good enough to receive a nomination for Best Picture.
The rule change seems unlikely to stir up interest among the decreasing audience for the Oscar telecast. After all, by the time the show rolls around, not only will moviegoers already know how many movies will be nominated, they are likely to have a very good idea of which of those movies will actually win. If the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences really want to add some surprise elements to the Oscar telecast that results in an increase in audience, they should schedule the show before the Golden Globes and SAG Awards so that the actual winners will not already essentially be known by viewers.
Published by Timothy Sexton - Featured Contributor in Arts & Entertainment
Timothy Sexton was named this site's very first Writer of the Year. Today he has two daily columns and one weekly column on Yahoo! Movies as well as frequent irregular contributions. Mr. Sexton was twice nam... View profile
10 Best Actor in a Supporting Role Potentials for the 2010 Oscar AwardsMy choices for potential 2010 Oscar Awards for Best Actor in a Supporting Role. Includes some Oscar nominees and some actors I believe have been overlooked.
Offbeat Academy Award TriviaWhat weird ultra-right wing rule was instituted in 1957? What did all the Best Actor characters of 1983 have in common? Who received the first Best Actor nod for a musical?
Top 5 Sports MoviesWhile there are many sports movies out there that I still need to see, these five that I have chosen are still ones that have stayed with me years after I have seen them.- Celebrating 70 Years of Movie Magic: The Greatest Movies from 1939 to 2009Here's my list of the greatest films, from 1939 to 2009 in celebration of the last 70 years since "the greatest year in film history."
The Historical Roots of the Writers Guild Strike: The Guilds Shun the Ac...The Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences was founded by Metro-Goldwyn Mayer V.P. Louis B. Mayer to forestall unionization in Hollywood. During the height of the Great Depr...
- Academy Awards Update: The Oscar Nomination & Voting Process
- Oscars, Academy Awards, and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences
- Academy Awards Best Picture Nominees Send Message
- Complete List of the 2008 Academy Awards Nominations
- Surprise Wins at the 79th Annual Academy Awards
- Director Robert Wise was a Master Craftsman: Nominated for Academy Awards as Produ...
- The Good and the Awful Best Actress Oscar Winners




