A staff attorney for the ACLU's National Security Project, Melissa Goodman, had this to say about the suit: "Once again, the Bush administration is stifling debate by preventing U.S. audiences from engaging prominent scholars face-to-face. When the government excludes scholars from the U.S. - particularly scholars who frequently traveled to this country without any problems in the past, but who happen to be vocal critics of U.S. policies - it sends the cowardly message that our government is afraid of opposing voices. This kind of political litmus test is both unconstitutional and un-American."
Sarah Wunsch, staff attorney with the ACLU of Massachusetts, commented further that: "Immigration officials should not be in the business of blocking our borders to people with political views they dislike. Silencing critics and forbidding Americans the right to hear dissenting voices harms academic and political freedom in the United States."
Professor Habib is the Deputy Vice-Chancellor of Research, Innovation and Advancement at the University of Johannesburg. The ACLU alleges that the government revoked Habib's visa last October without giving any explanation for their action. The group also claims that before this time Professor Habib traveled frequently to the United States for speaking engagements, and formerly lived in New York for years. Professor Habib is a Muslim, and the group claims that his anti-war views and disagreement with several of the United States anti-terrorism measures was the reason for the government's refusal to allow him in to the country.
Professor Habib flew to New York in advance of meetings with representatives from the World Bank, Centers for Disease Prevention and Control along with the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation among others. Upon arrival Habib was detained and reportedly questioned about his political views for seven hours before he was deported to South Africa. The US government reportedly revoked the visas of Habib's wife and children, also with no explanation.
The ACLU is bringing the suit on behalf of several organizations and academic institutions that sought to invite Professor Habib to participate in speaking engagements. These organizations include: the American Sociological Association (ASA), the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC), the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), and the Boston Coalition for Palestinian Rights (BCPR).
The suit names Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice and Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff as defendants. The suit seeks immediate processing and renewal of Professor Habib's visa.
Professor Habib had these comments about the situation: "I find it profoundly disturbing that the U.S. government continues to deny me the opportunity to participate in the kind of robust academic and political debate that is central to the American democratic system. Now more than ever, people from around the world recognize the consequences of American isolation within the global community. By letting in outsiders who represent ideological diversity, the U.S. can make good on its democratic ideals."
Published by A. Kairi
A. Kairi is a natural beauty care and crafting enthusiast that has operated a natural beauty care products business since 2004. She has held dozens of natural beauty care workshops in private venues and at M... View profile
- Dept. Of Homeland Security Employees Have Degrees from Unaccredited Online Diploma...First George W. Bush sleeps through Yale and then he allowed the Dept. of Homeland Security to be staffed by who knows how many employees who got an online diploma simply by sending in a check.
- Where the Candidates Stand on the Necessity of Dismantling the Dept. Of Homeland S...The Dept. of Homeland Security has proven to be inefficient, incompetent and the primary source for violating civil rights. It has also proven to be a bottomless money pit through which pork barrel funding has flouri...
- Homeland SecurityHomeland Security in the wake of Katrina
President Bush and "The War on Terror"My personal views on President Bush's War on Terror and how the funds spent on his war effort could have been put to better use elsewhere.
War on TerrorAs the "War on Terror" and the Military Industrial Complex consume vital resources, we, as a nation, place ourselves at risk the downfall of our nation and our way of life.
- Department of Homeland Security Graduates Second Advanced Class
- Department of Homeland Security Talks About the Safety of the Nation's Bridges
- Department of Homeland Security and I.C.E. Accused of Rights Violations and Illega...
- Real ID: Department of Homeland Security Make Final Ruling
- Will China Show the Department of Homeland Security the Way?
- Book Review: Disaster, Hurricane Katrina and the Failure of Homeland Security by C...
- Bush vs. Iraq: How the war on terror became a war on Iraqi human rights
- Scholar reportedly interrogated about his political views before he was deported
- Scholar came to U.S. for meetings with the World Bank, CDC, and the Gates Foundation
- Suit names Condoleeza Rice and Chertoff as Defendants





1 Comments
Post a CommentThe AAUP? Now there's a dangerous bunch-no wonder he's being excluded. :) What an outrage. Glad you are writing about it and providing so much detail.