For 2005, the 2-door hatchback has several upgrades from the previous year, including a revised suspension, steering and brakes. Among other improvements, some models have more horsepower, more heavily bolstered seats and an increase from 16 to 17-inch wheels.
For my weekly drive, I scooted around town and on the freeway in the Type-S, the highest-performance of the RSX models. Like other Acuras, the RSX is a recommended purchase by ConsumerGuide, the monthly national review magazine based in Illinois.
But as much as I tried to like the RSX, several things about the vehicle just never seemed likeit warranted best-buy status. There's nothing particularly inferior about the car, but nor is any exterior or interior feature outstanding.
The Acura RSX is grouped with the Mini-Cooper and the Scion tC in the sporty/performance category. As such, they shouldn't be expected to offer spacious luxury of any sort. Nevertheless, as a 6-foot, 180-pound driver, I never felt comfortable driving the car. But it wasn't just me. My wife is 5-foot-4 and weighs 115 pounds. She remarked several times that as both the driver and a front-seat passenger, she never felt comfortable.
Our assessment: the seats are not constructed with sufficiently cushioned material and their positioning in the vehicle seems to be an afterthought. Correspondingly, there's little head or sufficient leg room for a driver or front-passenger my size. And entering and/or exiting the car is awkward at best.
Sports cars are not usually known for quiet rides. And while not expecting much, the RSX is noisy even by sports car standards. There was sufficient wind noise on the freeway as well as tire noise in most driving circumstances.
There's nothing overtly stylish about the RSX. Instrumentation is nondescript, although gauges are angled toward the driver for easier reading. The overall interior design is adequate, but the materials are basic and without any distinguishing features or nuances.
As a sports car, the RSX has merit. The Type-S has 210 horsepower and it's rated at 0-60 mph at 7.8 seconds for 2004, with a slight improvement expected for '05. The vehicle's steering and handling are perhaps the car's best offering. Cornering is tight and the steering wheel has a firm feel and offers precision maneuvering - like one would expect in a sports car. Gas mileage estimates in city and highway situations are good, although premium fuel is recommended for the Type-S and regular for the base model RSX.
Despite good horsepower. the 2.0-liter, 4-cylinder, 16-valve car feels slightly sluggish and there's a slight hesitation when a quick power jolt is required. The car's responsiveness improves at higher rpms.
The vehicle has a good selection of standard features, with Type-S adding 50 additional horsepower over the base model as well as a Bose AM/FM cassette player with six-disc CD changer, a rear spoiler and the aforementioned increase from 16 to 17-inch wheels.
Standard features on all models include: cruise control, split-folding rear seat, power windows, doors and locks, remote keyless entry and a power sunroof, among a host of other commond industry features.
But when it's all added up, the RSX falls short. Most Acura models for 2005 have received best-buy status from various consumer publications. It's just difficult to understand why the RSX is included.
2005 Acura RSX
Safety features - Driver and passenger dual front and side airbags. Antilock brakes.
Fuel Mileage (estimates) - 23 (city), 31 (highway).
Warranty - Bumper to bumper, 4 years/50,000 miles; Corrosion, 5 years, unlimited mileage; (24-hour) roadside assistance program.
Base price - $23,570.00
Published by James Raia
As a 30-year veteran journalist, I contribute sports, travel, business and lifestyle articles to myriad print and online publications. For more articles, visit my web site: ByJamesRaia.com View profile
- Why used cars are more efficient than new carsAn article that describes the downsides of buying a new car.
- Car Buying Tips: Pros and Cons of New Cars and Used CarsNew car smell can be added to a used car. Rebates and discounts can make a new car priced like used. There are many different opinions on the advantages and disadvantages of buying a new car. There are just as many...
- Car Reviews: 2006 Pontiac GTOAlthough the new generation GTO may not be exactly what the car community expected, it is nonetheless a solid vehicle that can get by on it's own merits.
Car Review - Suzuki Vehicles Are WinnersI'd never heard of a Suzuki until I completed a book signing last year. After renting one Grand Vitara, drooling over the GL7 at a car show, and buying a Forenza, did my Suzuki...- Classic Car Review: 1969 Chevy Camaro 307 V8The best Car I ever owned or (They quit making them when they are this good)
- Acura RSX Type S Car Review
- Car Reviews: 2005 RSX Type S
- The Best New Cars for College Graduates
- Road Rage Tour Featuring the New Cars with Todd Rundgren, and Blondie
- New Cars Make Strong Impact in U.S. News & World Report's 2008 Car Rankings
- Three of the Best, Cheap New Cars for 2008
- Helpful Hints on Buying New Cars
- Tight, uncomfortable seats
- Tire and wind noise at most speeds
- Good, confident steering





2 Comments
Post a CommentIf my grandpa drove my car, he would give it the same assessment. This car is for 27 yr olds. You have to be aggressive to see what the car really can do. The back seat also is a little difficult to fit a walker and the seats are a little stiff on those old, achy joints compares to a buick.
Wow, you really aren't familiar with compact sports cars are you?? Try driving other cars in the same category of the RSX, they just don't compare. You say that the seats aren't comfortable, you say the cushioning is too stiff. Well if you knew anything about real sports cars, you would know that they are equipped with stiffer seats, so you don't sink in, or move too much in hard cornering.
You also say the car is sluggish at low rpms, obviously you haven't heard about Vtec. At low rpms the car only has around 160 bhp. Until it hits 5,800 rpms when "Vtec" kicks in, delivering 201 bhp from a 2.0 liter 4 cylinder. Thats the most hp any completely naturally aspirated car has ever made....ever. No v6 or v8, or even v12, has made over 100 hp per liter, without being turboed or supercharged.
Oh and your 0-60 times of 7.8 seconds, are closer to the base model RSX. The Type-s does it in the 6.4-6.7 range, stock.
You also say the interior is only "adequate"?? It has one o