Airlines to U.S. Air Marshals: We Don't Want You in First Class Anymore
Can Air Marshals Be More Effective in Coach -- or is This Just About Money?
Airlines are typically required to give up a first class passenger seat to a marshal boarding a flight for security purposes. The airline can be restrained from selling the seat in advance, or sometimes a paid passenger may even get bumped to coach at the last minute. The passenger will then be offered flight points or other perks for relinquishing the seat-but they will not be given the reason, as that could risk national security.
According to a report from USA Today, the airlines feel it is too costly and the risk just isn't there. The Marshals' representatives countered the statement by saying that the very act by the airlines of making this issue public could tip off terrorists and raise the security threat.
Is this all about airlines' money, rather than passenger security? Or would the marshals be more effective in coach?
Federal Air Marshals work for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under the Transportation Security Administration. They have been regularly placed on flights since the terrorist attack of Sept. 11, 2001. The Federal Air Marshals Program website states that each marshal must travel alone and rely on his/her training to recognize and thwart any threat aboard the airplane.
Is it a better idea to have the marshals in first class, or in coach? Here are some advantages and disadvantages:
- If a U.S. Air Marshal is sitting in first class, there's a possibility he'd be able to stop any attacker from getting into the flight deck.
- However, they're sitting with their back to three-quarters of the passengers, sometimes separated by a curtain. The marshal in first class could be oblivious to preliminary threats in coach.
- On 9/11, there were 19 hijackers split between the airplanes. Some were assigned to overtake pilots, some to fly the planes, and others to overpower the passengers. They were scattered throughout the aircraft.
- If an Air Marshal, trained as they are today, had been sitting among the coach passengers, he might have been able to detect the threat of a hijacking early by observing suspicious activity or carry-on luggage, or overhearing conversations and tiny noises that might come from devices or weapons covertly being assembled.
- Flight attendants and pilots might have been warned by the marshal before a hijacker had a chance to move toward the control cabin. Marshals might have been able to contact ground support to send military fighter planes.
- Perhaps the point is moot, because now that terrorists know we are watching the airplanes, they're trying their attacks in different settings. So the air threat is lessened.
- Of course, there is a chance one Air Marshal is not enough. For example, there were five hijackers on American Flight 11 that day.
But it would really make the airlines angry if they had to give up the sale for a first class seat and a coach seat.
Sources:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration, Federal Air Marshal Service.
"Airlines seek to move air marshals from first class," Alan Levin, USA Today, 10/19/10.
The 9/11 Commission Report of 2004.
Published by Sheryl Young - Featured Contributor in Politics
Freelance writer since 1997; Featured Political Contributor for Yahoo!; Tampa Tribune Community Columnist/Blogger; Chicken Soup for the Soul; Amy Foundation National Writing Award; happy wife, proud step-mom... View profile
- September 11th Events and the Related Emergency Services EffortsThe intent of this paper is to exam the four crashes of American Airlines Flight 11, United Airlines flight 175, American Airlines Flight 77 and United Airlines Flight 93 and the rescue efforts before during and after...
- How to Start Out in Airline Security: Employers, Advancement and Your First JobTo explore this job, watch people at work your next time at the airport. Notice how many people are involved in screening luggage and passengers.
Fly NakedIf government fails to keep us safe, will we have to fly naked?
Homeland Security: More Air Marshals for European FlightsHomeland Security will add more air marshals to European flight immediately. Michael Chertoff believes that this is an important measure that needs to be taken right now with th...- Book Review: Guns, Freedom, and TerrorismA review of a 2003 book by NRA executive, Wayne LaPierre....
- The Truth About Homeland Security
- Federal Air Marshals
- Director Dana Brown of the Federal Air Marshals Points Agency in the Right Direction
- United Airlines Shoe Bomb Attempt Stopped by Air Marshals, According to ABC News
- Kim Kardashian Tweets About Air Marshal on Flight to Los Angeles
- Air Marshals' First Casualty: Passenger in Miami Killed
- Test Run for Terrorists in Los Angeles Airport?





72 Comments
Post a CommentInteresting idea! Great article! :-)
Very interesting Sheryl. You cover such great topics.
Thanks for sharing
I wish there's room for the marshall in the cockpit itself... Good reporting (as always), Sheryl! :o)
fantastic ♥ thanks for sharing
PV Love
Excellent job!
That's certainly true, but access to the pilots is at the front of the airplane :)
There is no script fighting the threats..but tactics should be paramount to comfort & cost. How about letting the security experts determine..there are obvious/common sense advantages to the positioning of the Marshall(s)
Good article and weighing of the pros and cons. I agree that the best solution would be one in 1st and one in coach but that's unlikely.