12

Al-Jazeera Remembers July 12, 1191: Acre Falls to the Crusaders

Tony Jingo
On July 12, 2008 Arabic news station al-Jazeera did a recurring five minute piece lamenting the fall of the Muslim city of Acre (Arabic: 'Akka) to the Crusaders. The Siege of Acre commenced August 28, 1189, concluded July 12, 1191, and was the first confrontation of the Third Crusade, also known as the Kings' Crusade.

As reported by Raymond Ibrahim for Jihad Watch, the al-Jazeera narrator was more or less objective regarding the facts of this battle, though much more emphasis was placed on the "atrocities" committed against the Muslim inhabitants of Acre than anything else.

Were atrocities committed? One would be naive to reply in the negative. This does not negate the justification for the Third Crusade, or the first one for that matter. What the West is failing to acknowledge for the sake of political correctness and/or a misguided attempt at appeasement for peace's sake is historical accuracy of the Western world's struggles with Islam. Revising history doesn't change it, it hides it. History is usually interesting and always relevant, we must heed the lessons regardless if we like the message or not. If the West continues to bury their heads in the sand, regarding Islamic ideology, they risk finding the same removed from its host.

One thing for certain is that the "radical" or perhaps a more apt description is "devout," regardless of the adjective; the Islamic world is winning the hearts and minds of their citizens, especially the young. Islamic ideology is furthered by great propagandist machines, dressed up as objective and secular entities such as al-Jazeera. As the al-Jazeera "Today in History" segment revealed, historical context is simply to further a jihadist agenda.

In order to convince the populous that jihad is justified in contrast to the view of the "religion of peace" the Islamic supremacists must convince the populous that they are merely defending themselves from the kafir (non-Muslims) or as Osama refers to such ilk, the as-Salibin: "the Crusaders."

When media outlets such as al-Jazeera report their version of history, it is not for history's sake folks. It is to say "Hey on July 12, 1191 the Crusaders (modern day Americans and Europeans) disrespected Muslims AND they are still doing it today. Those in the West suffering from Bush Derangement Syndrome, or just at the mall, or stuck in their version of reality [television], replies, "Hey, that's right dude" and returns to their next purchase of blue jeans and super-sized cups of kool-aid.

The West over the years has furthered the mantra that the West was the perpetrators of that era. The problem with such revisionist way of thinking is it gives present day Islamic jihadists encouragement and justification. Young Muslim men graduating madrassas and entering Taliban University aren't saying "Yeah dude that was 1191 no big deal." No, they are saying "Death to America."

Mr. Ibrahim reminds us that Osama bin Laden reveals that he (Osama) has a prodigious memory concerning both the former glory of Islam as well as the "indignities" it has been made to suffer at the hands of the Crusaders and their descendants, modern day Westerners, whom he, and almost every other "radical," refers to simply as as-Salibin: "the Crusaders."

Political correctness be damned, let the West not forget their past accurate historical accounts and the indignities it has been made to suffer at the hands of the "religion of peace."

Never Forget.

The eventual Fall of Acre was realized in 1291 and that siege lasted only six weeks, beginning on April 6 and ending with the fall of the city to the Muslims on May 18, though the Templars would hold out in their fortified headquarters until the 28th.

Al-Jazeera's take? Stay tuned.

Today, the old city of Acre (Hebrew: Akko) located in the Western Galilee area of northern Israel has been designated by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site and contains a tunnel leading to a 13th century fortress of the Knights Templar. Acre has one of the highest proportions of non-Jews of any of Israel's cities with an Arab and Druze population, as well as a small community of Baha'is [baa haa hees], who regard Acre as the most sacred city in their faith. The city is a magnet for tourists and the home of the country's steel industry. It also produces exports including iron, chemicals, and textiles. Source: wikipedia

Published by Tony Jingo

An American Patriot with an independent view on today's topics. Jingo (noun) One who vociferously supports one's country  View profile

28 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Anthony Ventre2/10/2010

    Forgot to say, bro', this is a terrific read...

  • Anthony Ventre2/10/2010

    Judaism and Christianity did not originate with a desire for power, though power became a larger motivation later. Judaeo-Christianity is much less about power even today, whereas Islam, which began after 7 centuries of Christianity and many more years of Judaism, was always about power and conquest. Modernized Islam is under attack, too, as Islamic extremists try to draw the religion back into the 7th century mentality of conquest. The first thing the "Mohammadans" did was to conquer parts of Europe.

  • Deonils12/9/2009

    Wow, a real education. Question: I think the Mongols were attackiong both Muslims and Christians at the time ... why did the Monotheists not unite against Genghis Khan's hordes? The modern jihad is against India; remember Mumbai massacres of 2008 (Thanksgiving, to boot!). Nothing unites Pakistanis as getting together to kill a few dozen Indians or more. This hate ... is irrational because India has been kinder to these terrorits than any nation in the world! Shalom my Friend

  • Adam Michael Luebke7/28/2008

    Interesting article, indeed. And somewhat controversial. Propaganda seems to be prevalent with all of our respected countries and religions. We are all guilty of making others suffer, and of committing horrid atrocities. Unfortunately, the people of the world will never get beyond that if we constantly divide ourselves. Nice work.

  • J P Whickson7/28/2008

    I am interested in history but hate history with an agenda. I fear that no matter what we read, it is tainted by the beliefs of the writer. In this case, we can discuss the religeous persecution, fanatisism and etc. The fact is, the people of the past bear no resemblence to the communitites of the same name today. This is a great article and a good read.

  • PenPress7/25/2008

    You have addressed a very important issue.

  • Secretsides7/25/2008

    Our American government seems to think that they can or have the right to fix the rest of the world, with a teaspoon. I would like to see them have the same fervor for their own country. It is kind of like what Jesus said , take the log out of your own eye before you try to take the splinter our of your brothers, neighbors whatever. I think we have a lot of our own serious issues that need addressed here before we try to tell others how to live. This is an excellent reminder of history and what we are trying to go up against. Excellent as always Tony I am amazed at your intelligence.

  • Kassidy Emmerson7/18/2008

    Wow. I just learned a whole lot. 5 stars plus!

  • Tina Molly Lang7/17/2008

    Fascinating! I'm not too familiar with Islamic history so I can't really comment except to say that I learned a lot.

  • Sheryl Young7/17/2008

    Great information - stuff I didn't know. I study mostly Israel's ancestral history, but never took on this aspect of the Crusades.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.