While the author may feel his book is not political nor an accusation of the older generation, the fact remains that the major characters in the book are like puppets, in the sense that they get orders to be carried out, often by far distant officials and officers who play with maps while their soldiers face death and injuries in the trenches. We get the sense that it is the older generation who pushed young men into service. Kantorek, Paul Baumer's professor, urged his young students to be patriotic and enlist. The very idea of fighting for patriotism is denounced by Remarque, because the one student who hesitated before enlisting was the first to die. Patriotism, after reading the novel, is such a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it is almost a sin to be unpatriotic. On the other, patriotism can be a deadly feeling: going to war to defend one's nation against what the government considers an enemy. Can this novel be considered political? Obviously, the Nazis thought so, since the first banned and then burned copies of this book in the 1930s. Wars are created by governments made up of elderly politicians. They are fought by the sons and daughters of the government's generation. Often, these are ordinary men who are in the trenches. There is a current simile in Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11, where he corners Congressmen and Senators to ask whether their family members are fighting in Iraq or Afghanistan; as well as the current investigation about President Bush's ability to remain at home while so many other ordinary men and women went to Viet Nam.
There was a specific and obvious division between the older soldiers and those who enlisted right out of school. One soldier, Mueller, kept questioning his friends about their postwar plans. Older men who had prewar jobs and families regarded the war as an interruption in their lives that eventually would end. They had concrete identities and functions within society. Younger men, such as Paul and his classmates, had no such concrete identities. They entered the war when they were on the threshold of their adult lives. Maybe that is why, as some analyses of the book (www.sparknotes.com/lit/allquiet/) call this group "the lost generation". The worst loss of all is the loss of lives. There is no doubt that this book, especially the final chapter which is a sort of epilogue, points out both the ruthlessness and the loss of an entire generation of young men: What is ironic, at the end of the novel, is that Paul and his friends survive nearly three years of trench warfare, only to die within months of the peace agreement. Paul dies in October 1918, barely a month before the armistice that ended World War I in November. Paul is also the last of the boys in his class. His death marks the end of a generation of young men who represent the lost generation as a whole. Even though some soldiers may have survived the war, Remarque portrays the conflict as having symbolically eradicated an entire generation.
Of course this is an indictment of both government and Old Guard. One the U.S. entered the war in 1917, the Germans knew they would lose. They could have stopped a year earlier and saved a generation. But, the idea of "patriotism" and "pride" not only destroyed much of the younger generation, but brought financial ruin- and eventually Hitler and the Nazis to power. What the Old Guard accomplished, in fact, was to bring about World War II and the death of millions. After every chapter, a reader has to think "What if?" and realize it was the German government's stubbornness that became a worldwide tragedy a generation later and became the most deadly of wars..
REFERENCES:
Remarque, Erich Maria All Quiet on the Western Front New York: Little, Brown (1929)
Excerpts from "All Quiet on the Western Front" www.sparknotes.com/lit/allquiet/
Published by Werner Haas
A freelance writer, marketing and advertising consultant for many years, and also recently published novel THE WASPS (Available on amazon.com) screenplays and TV pilots available, also co-writer of Hungarian... View profile
- Ten Films to Teach World War II in the Social Studies ClassroomUse one of these ten movies to enrich your social studies World War II curriculum.
Thanksgiving: Free Old Time Radio for a World War II ThanksgivingCommand Performance began as a way for popular entertainers to show their support of the United States military efforts during World War II in 1942. Today, it can draw generatio...- World War II Descriptive Timeline. Eve of World War II In 1931 Japan attacked Manchuria and pounding the Chinese defense. Italy started to attack Ethiopia, while Germany, where Hitler organized Nazis, undertook a large rearmament.
- End of the World Prophecies: A Brief Overview of World War 3 PredictionsGlobal warming, sparse food, over-populated, is China to blame? A review of World War 3 predictions.
Buyer's Guide for Authentic World War II GearAt the Front provides authentic World War II combat equipment and furnishings. Great for World War II re-enactments or for a collector's showcase, atthefront.com offers a pletho...
- Worst World War II Movies Ever, Part One: Battle of the Bulge
- Generation Y: Are Perceptions that "Millennials" Smarter and Politically Aware Cor...
- Generation Gap !!
- A Just War is Hard to Find - Johnny Got His Gun & the Good War Analyses
- Letters from Iwo Jima: An Inspiring Story
- In the Trenches
- The Southern Press and the Holocaust
