The United States government is designed to evolve with the changing times, be they timely and evolutionary or rapid and revolutionary. The rapid times often test the validity of a governmental structure. If citizens of a democracy lose their voice during a radical time in the nation or world, the democracy will fail. Often, the government, in desperation, will overlook the general opinion of the public. Flag burning is one way to reclaim their attention, to bring forth a serious realization that the people think that whatever the government is doing is wrong and/or unjustifiable.
Flag burning also offers a form of attention to the minority, as exemplified in the Johnson (Texas v. Johnson) case. Although Johnson was a Communist in the United States and therefore a minority, he still had every right guaranteed to him by the Constitution, regardless of his lack of confidence in the document.
Many war veterans claim serious offense to a burning American flag, because they have risked their lives for America. Their offense is certainly justified, and demonstrates how flag burning could be used as a tool of protest against a war. If war did not have protesters or if our government did not allow itself or its citizens to rally against a war, we would be in a constant state of war, therefore disgracing the flag to a greater degree by painting its red stripes with the blood of the people of our nation, innocent civilians and the population of the entire world. This blood would not be the blood that birthed our nation free of tyrannical rule, it would be the blood of the destruction of everything that we have created as a nation and as a world. Such a limit on our freedom is an absolute death sentence to all that live and swear by it.
To each American, flag burning is a personal issue. 79% of American voters believe that the American people should have the direct right to determine whether Americans have the right to desecrate their own flag. 69% of voters also believe that flag desecration is a "Total or Extremely Important" issue. 70% of both GOP members as well as 70% of Democrats believe that flag desecration is a "Total or Extremely Important"
issue.
Various opinions, some of which I would not hesitate to classify as propaganda, are spread throughout the world wide web. Major General Patrick H. Brady (US Army- Ret.), the Chairman of the Citizens Flag Alliance, has announced a youth scholarship contest, where students can win scholarship money by stating that the American flag should be saved from desecration. This is a clear attempt to bribe the impressionable minds of America into an opinion. Brady offers students money to state his own opinion which might not necessarily be the opinion of the children he is bribing! Brady is an example of a conservative who is attempting to limit our liberties. As a respected military officer, he is destroying the fabric of liberties which he has fought so diligently to protect.
In contrast, Cornell College theater professor Paul Sannerud wrote a controversial play entitled "How to Burn an American Flag." This play, instead of bribing American citizens with money, offers Americans the opportunity, on their own choice, to attend his play's performance and to judge his opinion. Sannerud does not bribe people to view his play or his opinions, and he successfully uses the theater, an American pastime, as a means to express his view appropriately.
Rage Against the Machine, an alternative music group, performed on Saturday Night Live and was censored. Not only was it censored for "inappropriate language" (although Saturday Night Live is obviously a show that is inappropriate for children and shown at a late hour), but for inappropriate usage of American flags. Rage decorated the stage with American flags- placed upside down- to demonstrate their "rage" against "the machine," or government. Although their views are extreme, Rage should not have been censored because they displayed the American flag upside down. Constitutionally, that is not a valid reason to censor American citizens.
In 1997, a Native American artist, Steven Leyba, displayed his work: Wounded Knee Decomposition I. This display included two desecrated American flags, commemorating the Battle of Wounded Knee (1890), which was not a battle, but a severe massacre directed to the Native Americans by the United States Government. In present day, over a hundred years after the massacre, the government still censored the artist for portraying the flags in such a manner, demonstrating the oppressive power that the government occasionally does exercise on the people that it is supposed to serve. This is not only a violation of Leyba's 1st Amendment right of freedom of expression (as declared by the Supreme Court in the Johnson case), but also a clearly oppressive and prejudiced act; a violation of Leyba's 14th Amendment rights! Leyba clearly and peacefully demonstrated that he remembered the struggles of his people, part of his own personal history. The artist wished to share his form of expression with the public, of all ages and races, who should not be hindered from hearing or seeing another American's opinion.
The American people, if offended, were not forced in any way to view the artwork. Still, Leyba was censored by the city officials until he was forced to move his work elsewhere.
Although flag burning, particularly in the Johnson case, may seem extreme, the instances as exemplified by the censoring of Rage Against the Machine and Steven Leyba clearly demonstrate that the barring of one American right can seep like a disease into many roots of the Constitution and our rights therein, destroying everything that the government created by the people and for the people is. If other citizens and the government continue to conservatively chip our rights away from the Constitution, and if we appease their hunger to do so, then we are part of the problem and part of our own downfall.
Sources:
-The Flag Burning Page: http://www.esquilax.com/flag/culture.html
-Citizens Flag Alliance: http://www.cfa-inc.org
The Supreme Court Case Texas v. Johnson
Published by Tara M. Clapper - Featured Contributor in Arts & Entertainment, Travel, Technology and Lifestyle
Tara M. Clapper is a freelance writer living in the Philadelphia area. The author steadily produces material for content sites and private clients while pursuing a Masters in Publishing part time. Tara s... View profile
American Flag Coffee Table DIY ProjectThis American Flag Coffee table is the perfect way to transform an old vintage wood trunk, an existing coffee table, or almost any wood surface. - Respecting Old Glory: Proper Flag EtiquetteIt is alarming that very few patriotic citizens actually know the proper etiquette for treatment of our flag. Here are some guidelines to help give the flag its due and proper respect.
- How to Throw a Flag Day PartyWith less competition on your friends' calendars than a Memorial Day or Fourth Of July party would have, a Flag Day party stands out from the pack. These Flag Day party ideas will help you show your patriotism in style.
Our Stars and Stripes Will Always Fly The poem "In Flanders Field" and the words I have written here came to mind as I listened to General David Petraeus give his report on the war in Iraq
Stars and Stripes Wooden Dining SetThis fabulous table and matching chair project looks wonderful in any country or Americana themed kitchen.
- How the American Flag Should Be Displayed This Summer
- The Flag: To Burn or Not to Burn
- Unique Patriotic Wedding Cake Ideas: Mini American Flag Shaped Cakes
- Show American Flag Proper Respect
- Three Yale Students Arrested for Burning American Flag
- American Flag Folk Art for Your Front Porch
- Celebrating the American Flag
- Had we not discarded the image of the British flag, the American flag would have never been created.





9 Comments
Post a Commentthe flag is important because its with that flag we defend your rights Jacques Boulerice its is a symbol of the liberty you have flag or not people burn other flags cause they do something wrong or evil such as commies we fight for better reasons u say you burn it just because but what have u done to earn those rights how are u protecting those rights by burning what we stand for
One of the qualities so admired by other democracies is the US constitutional guarantee of personal freedoms, no matter how provocatively these freedoms may be used or misused. That said, on a highly emotive issue like burning the national flag, people owe it to their fellow citizens to be sensitive to the feelings of the majority.
isn't this the interesting type of topic I always love to read about. I read a poem of yours earlier and after this I like your approach on things. Pretty cool.
I agree on all points.
Great piece. You've hit the nail right on the head. Whether or not one agrees with flag burning is irrelevant, for flag burning is the right of the American people, as guaranteed by the constitution. To take away that right, is to take away what the flag stands for, and if what the flag stands for is taken away, then why not burn it?
i think is bad
i think is bad
For me, the flag means little. I love the United States of America, with or without a flag. We put way too much emphasis on that piece of cloth. Take the "Pledge of Allegience"--pledging first to the flag, then, almost as an afterthought, oh yeah, "and to the republic, for which it stands". For years, I have been trying to get the words changed to "I pledge allegience to the United States of America and the flag that represents it, and will defend them to the best of my ability against all enemies."
I think it makes a statement and that statement is strong but at times out of place and can certainly be taken out of context in one direction or the other. I personally don't get hung up on words or acts invoking 'freedom of speech' however I understand how other people can be more invested. It's the emotional infusion of meaning into the fabric that makes it a statement of any sort and isn't that the point?