An Alternate Perspective on Christian Sex

Reever Tolt
It's with a great deal of enthusiasm and respect that I welcome Christians to the secular world. Hot sex is something that my wife and I have enjoyed for over 20 years. We've never felt the least bit guilty about it and I'm glad that you no longer do either.

It must be refreshing to now be able to move about your mattress as you and your husband wish. Now that some guy standing behind a pulpit sees fit to tell you it's OK. OK to be a fully fulfilled human being.

Since Mr. Beam has spoken for your God: "Likes them (women) better!" I have to assume that his communication pipeline to The Almighty might be a little bit skewed, perhaps? I recall in Genesis that God condemned women to suffer in childbirth for all eternity. Has this penalty been lifted also.? I sure hope so.

That Mr. Beam is a professional sex councilor troubles me a bit. Why does this man not know why women are multi orgasmic? Women are able to have multiple orgasms to allow for multiple partners to ensure propagation of the species. By the same token, a man's ejaculation is preceded by a small amount of spermicide to ensure the survival of his own bloodline. The penis has a shape that moves another male's sperm out of its way.These are facts. It's Biology 101.

Now that you're emerging from the Christian Cocoon of Guilt you'll now enjoy all the bliss your Church pastors, priests ministers, deacons and elders have enjoyed for centuries. Dozens of centuries.

Did you really think the Jewish, Christian, Muslim hierarchies actually practice the dogma that is preached? Do you really believe that the founders of these three Abrahamic religions thought sex was dirty?

A cursory glance at the history of these Middle Eastern, and hence Western religions bear out some facts. Christians and Jews, and to this day Muslims view women as second class citizens. Jews and Christians are today a little more forward thinking than they used to be. But the scriptures of all three bear out women as chattel. The religions of the Fertile Crescent that preceded these three often held woman in higher regard. She was worshipped as the Giver Of Life.

Think about it: Moses in 1500 BC, and later Augustine around 400 AD, then Mohammed around 600 AD all had one thing in common. They wanted to wield power and influence over large masses of people. All were leaders of armies.

So who needs girls along when trying wage war? Save for the occasional Joan of Arc or Cleopatra women are peaceniks. They would be a real nuisance when your out slaughtering and slaying and all. Keep 'em back at the c amp. The boys will need a big ol' hug after the battle.

Going clear back to Abraham around 2,000 BC women were little more than sex slaves. He ordered his wife to pretend to be his sister so he could woo the leader of a village. His wife was a bargaining tool for him to conduct business. Refer to Deuteronomy where the penalty for being a rape victim is to be stoned to death along with the rapist. No wonder Christians don't know why their genitals function the way they do!

The preponderance of concubines held by religious leaders in the Jewish, Christian and Islamic texts and even to this day in the Mid-East is startling. It was Ok for the male leaders to boink all they wanted but OH NO, not the women! Even today a promiscuous male is seen as a "stud" by his peers, yet a woman is a "slut". It's deeply rooted in religious dogma.

Consider the hypocrisy behind Moses ordering the slaying of the Midianites by his generals. The only people allowed to live were the virgins. Why? Moses had a big heart that day? No. He and his men needed sex slaves.

Read it. It's all there in the Bible. While your at it, reach for your King James Bible. King James, who amassed over 50 Cardinals and Bishops to translate the Bible to English, was a homosexual and pedophile.

In the 1980's archaeologists in Santa Barbara CA unearthed the remains of dozens of fetuses behind the living quarters of Father Junipero Serra and his nuns dating to the mid 1700's. Speculate for yourself.

Of course today we have the crying, blubbering Televangelists repenting on live TV for consorting with prostitutes. We have the child molester haven/ Catholic Church. The more things change the more they stay the same.

Or do they? Perhaps you people really are at the cusp of something new and wonderful. My hat is off to you many Christian men and women. I mean that with all sincerity. Have a good roll in the hay with someone you love! Enjoy it and smile about it when you're done!

Published by Reever Tolt

Former journalist and photojournalist. Now a crane operator living in Las Vegas  View profile

2 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Kim Linton2/24/2008

    I'm assuming you are referring to my article (http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/599509/hot_sex_and_the_evangelical_church.html). You have posted such a huge amount of misinformation here (mingled with a bit of truth) that I don't even know where to start. I'm also assuming that you believe yourself to be an atheist and have a whole lot of bitterness toward Christians and other people of faith. Your points are so random that there really isn't even a way for us to have an intelligent discussion regarding the issue. I was wondering why you did not comment on my article, but chose to go to the trouble of opening an account on AC and posting this article in response? Anyway, I wish you the best in your pursuits, and I do respect your courage to speak out about issues that you feel passionate about.

  • Nick Poma2/24/2008

    This theory might have some weight to it if in fact a woman's orgasm was necessary in order for her to get pregnant, or to even have multiple partners for that matter. However, even if a woman does not have an orgasm even once in her life (it is indeed a tragedy) sh is still able to becom impregnated or have multiple partners. This is not something that supports the THEORY of evolution, I could just as easily say that God just loves woman more than men and my argument would be just as valid. Just like evolutionist, always trying so hard to undermine the one true and living God. Your writing style is okay, but it is demeaning and insulting to someone that might not share your point of view.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.