Ashcroft and Cole have very different views on distinguishing protecting the citizens and violating the rights of citizens. They disagree on the facts regarding the detainment of immigrants. Ashcroft states, "Currently, we have brought criminal charges against 110 individuals, of whom 60 are in federal custody. The INS has detained 563 individuals on immigration violations" (527). Ashcroft presents this as an example of how the USA Patriot Act is benefiting the citizens. Cole disagrees with this method of detainment and says "The government seems to have dispensed with developing probable cause before arresting individuals, and instead has used pretexts- usually of routine immigration violations- as justification for detaining hundreds of people about whom it has only he slightest suspicion" (530). Ashcroft and Cole also greatly disagree over the facts concerning the treatment of the detainees. Ashcroft says that every person being held is given the right to contact legal aid, and their families. Cole points out that those who were detained were held without official charges being brought against them, and now the Immigration and Naturalization Service has modified the regulation so detention without charges is permissible for forty-eight hours, compared to the previous regulation of twenty-four.
Ashcroft and Cole have sharply contrasting underlying values and assumptions regarding the USA Patriot Act. John Ashcroft works with the Bush administration and is following his orders to inform the Senate of the intentions of the Patriot Act. Ashcroft works side by side with the President, and is therefore an advocate for the Patriot Act. He does not believe that human rights have been violated, and that the act is protecting the people of the United States. David Cole's article appeared in Amnesty Now, which is a magazine published by the organization Amnesty International, that is responsible for protecting human rights. Cole is also an attorney for the Center for Constitutional Rights. He feels that the USA Patriot Act greatly infringes on the rights of humans, particularly immigrants. He compares the current investigation of the terrorist attacks to the investigation dubbed the "Palmer Raids". These raids were held in 1919, and it was when immigrants were treated very poorly, when being interrogated about the bombing of the home of Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer. Cole points out the similarities of how individuals are detained; in the current investigation individuals are detained through immigration violations, and in the Palmer Raids individuals were detained by guilt by association. Both investigations primarily target immigrants. Cole states, "The government has imposed on aliens widespread human rights deprivations that citizens would not tolerate" (532).
Both Ashcroft and Cole make very strong points in their arguments. Ashcroft claims that protection is the reason for the Patriot Act and that it only enables us "to wage war on terrorism and defend our nation and its citizens" (529). However, Cole makes a strong point that "precisely because the terrorists violated every rule of human decency, it is critical that in responding to the terrorist threat we hold fast to the rule of law" (533). Cole feels that in protecting our country we will inevitably violate our own people.
Works Cited
Ashcroft, John. "Testimony to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary."
Rpt. In Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. John D. Ramage, John C. Bean, and June Johnson. 6th edition. New York: Longman, 2004. 524-529.
Cole, David. "The Ashcroft Raids." Amnesty Now Nov. 2002.
Rpt. In Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. John D. Ramage, John C. Bean, and June Johnson. 6th edition. New York: Longman, 2004. 529-533.
Published by Kay Brooks
College student View profile
- How to Speak Persuasively in PublicG. Stolyarov II, himself a public speaker, offers a set of principles that orators seeking to propagate rational ideas should heed in order to facilitate a thoughtful, thorough, sincere, and, above all, civil, transmi...
- David Archuleta: What's All the Buzz About?What is it about David Archuleta that has the American Idol judges and viewers going ga-ga?
- Dainty David and the Gigantic JerkA Play adaptation of David and Goliath
- John Legend, Soul Savior or Signed Hype to Kanye's LabelIs John Legend the next R&B superstar, or is he a product of hype from a producer? A soul music expert takes a critical look at his debut album. There are some great songs, there are lots of fillers. Legend has a long...
- A Few Words with Rapper Pigeon JohnPushing the boundaries of hip hop and soul is LA's original nerdy rapper, Pigeon John. With his smooth singing voice, sharp sense of humor and driving rhythms, PJ showcases his versatility as an entertainer on his lat...
- Analysis of the Death on the Cross
- The Immorality of Homosexual Sex
- The Symbolism of Snow White
- Consumer or Privately Driven; Who Benefits from the EU Moratorium on Genetically M...
- A History and Analysis of the Regensburg Colloquy
- The Good Friday Agreement
- How to Argue Effectively in Writing




1 Comments
Post a CommentVery interesting article. It definitely makes one think. Excellent job.