Analysis: One Year Before the 2008 Presidential Election

Through the Political Reporting of AC Content Producers, Here's a Look at the Presidential Election

Tim Skillern
Ron Paul, once a beyond-the fringe GOP presidential candidate, is now suddenly chic.

On Nov. 5, the Texas libertarian stirred interest when his fundraising campaign netted around $4 million in a day. It topped Mitt Romney's $3.1 million raised back in January and, as a daily online record, is only second to John Kerry's robust $5.8 million in 2004.

What does this mean, if anything?

Will Paul gain traction in the early states, force the heavy hitters to re-evaluate their strategies and perhaps even vault himself to Mike Huckabee-like status as a second-tier candidate? Or is Paul's Nov. 5 performance merely an indication that a presidential campaign, in a very fractured and niche media world, is skittish at best?

Of course, this election isn't about Ron Paul. It is, however, about candidates like him. They may not win, but they're causing enough commotion for pundits to comprehend this: The GOP race isn't as have-and-have-not as first believed.

If frontrunners pegged Paul merely as an afterthought, an amusing side circus or -- even less innocuous -- as insignificant, they might reconsider. While Paul certainly won't win the nomination, he gives pause to campaigns that believe their strategies are top-notch. At the very least, he shows Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani and Fred Thompson that they might be taking their top-heavy status for granted a full year before ballots are cast.

With Ron Paul in mind, here are some questions to ponder at the one-year-away mark:

Is Hillary in trouble in New Hampshire?

Hillary Clinton's lead in New Hampshire is diminishing, and according to this piece, is at its lowest level in some time. Nevertheless, she still holds a somewhat comfortable 10-point lead over Barack Obama. And, she's still leading in New York, Minnesota and with women (but not Democratic men).

What's the most bizarre story recently?

* Obama raised some eyebrows when he allegedly forgot to place his hand over his heart during the Pledge of Allegiance. An AC Content Producer wrote about it. He wrote her back. Read Obama's letter here.

* Dennis Kucinich (the left's version of Ron Paul) is still issuing press releases that he's still against the war in Iraq. He also has reportedly seen a UFO. That being said, we're really more interested in what he thinks of the Klingons' war against the Romulans.

* Even more shocking -- as this headline suggests -- is that Kucinich heads a national poll. The poll, conducted by Democracy for America, says he received more votes than Obama and former Sen. John Edwards combined, with 32 percent. Al Gore came in second nationally with 25 percent. Reports are filtering in that aliens stuffed the ballot box.

* Allegedly, God has endorsed Giuliani. Or, at the very least, that's the perspective from this Content Producer. God could not be reached for verification.

* And Stephen Colbert is running for president. Sort of. And only in South Carolina. It's been suggested that Peyton Manning should be his vice presidential candidate.

What's the best soundbite so far?

Frankly, the Republicans are a bit boring. But Joe Biden, a Democrat desperately trying to gain any visibility, is upping the ante by taking on a GOP frontrunner.

This article details his latest quip:

"Rudy Giuliani, the most under-qualified man to seek the presidency since George W. Bush," Biden said when asked about Hillary's qualifications. "[He] shouldn't be questioning the experience of anyone on this stage... There's only three things he says in a sentence: a noun, a verb, and 9/11."

Zing.

Who hearts Huckabee, and will they matter? That's a good question. In late October, the Family Research Council, says this AC article, conducted an online and offline straw poll that had Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney running neck-and-neck among anti-abortion Christians with 27 percent each. (Ron Paul -- remember him? -- received 15 percent.) But factoring in only the online polling, Huckabee ran away with it, with 51 percent to Romney's 10. Given Romney's skittish past on the abortion issue, it's suggested that there was a grassroots effort to stuff the online ballot box with as many Huckabee votes as possible. So, that begs the question: Can Huckabee play to a conservative base and secure anti-abortion votes in Iowa? Maybe so, but Romney still has a commanding lead, according to this article.

Published by Tim Skillern

I am the director of news-editorial for Yahoo! Contributor Network on Yahoo! News. Before that, I was a videographer, copy editor and/or sportswriter for the Rocky Mountain News, the Boulder Daily Camera and...  View profile

17 Comments

Post a Comment
  • D.S. Williamson11/17/2007

    Paul has no chance. We're going to have to live with that. Huckabee and Romney are the only ones who can win this thing for the Repubs. Hillary's got the Dems in the bag.

  • Austin Cooper11/10/2007

    Fun article. 5 stars!

  • Ikiriko Tamuno11/10/2007

    What must be must be. So they said but what you don't work out for, you can not treasuse.Saying were going to be free is not enough.all that is needed is to work out the freedom.

  • Bridgitte Williams11/9/2007

    This was fantastic! A LOL, a five stars and a Bravo!
    :-) I enjoyed the humor most of all. We need it, to survive the 2008 election, that is for sure.

  • Scott Schlimmer11/9/2007

    I see the political reporting, but where's the analysis?

  • David McDevitt11/9/2007

    "When it comes to the actual voting, half that show up will primarily base their vote off name recognition, or who their church said to vote for, etc." I agree, and i do so wish Mitt Romney would drop out. He scares me. Another thing: i am a die-hard republican, but honestly i think Ron Paul goes a little TOO far. End the war? Dude, i would stop paying taxes if i didn't know they would be spent on bombs. Deport Mexicans? Dude, if we can't defend our own border, that doesn't mean we sent the poor blokes back, 20 years after the fact. And of course, "Rudy Giuliani [is] the most under-qualified man to seek the presidency since George W. Bush;" this cracks me up. Bush has done a lovely job. Giuliani i don't like so much, but don't you dare dis Bush. He'll probably bomb you.

  • Deez11/9/2007

    Go Ron Paul. The most interesting, principled, man in the race. Give money to his campaign if you feel the same. I did.

  • wassup47111/8/2007

    Kind of funny reading this article, simply because of the language you used. Good job! And props to you for spreading the love to other AC contributers!

  • Ardeth Baxter11/8/2007

    Forgot to give you some good links to check out:

    http://www.xomba.com/dennis_kucinich_resolution_to_impeach_dick_cheney_gets_unexpected_votes_from_republicans

    http://www.xomba.com/dennis_kucinich_s_ufo_sighting_not_so_strange_many_americans_believe_in_extraterrestrial_life_0

    Go Dennis!

  • Luis Miranda11/8/2007

    By the comments in the article, I would say the writer has paid no attention to the campaign or the issues that interest the public. I can also say he is either a charlatan or a divine being, as he predicts that Ron Paul won't win the election. I remember when no one knew who Dr. Paul was a few months ago, and look at him now! He is being attacked and called a lunatic by the corrupted press and the allegedly top candidates. The funny part, is that none of them have arguments to contradict Ron Paul, just as the author of this article.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.