The monk, who is the speaker of the poem, attempts to convince the reader that he is a just, moral man. One of the ways he attempts to do this is by telling the reader about the special little things that he does to display his faith. Lines thirty-three through forty-one set forth just such an example:
"When he finishes reflection,
Knife and fork he never lays
Cross-wise, to my recollection
As I do, in Jesus praise.
I and Trinity illustrate,
Drinking watered orange-pulp-
In three sips the Arian frustrate;
While he drains his at one gulp!"
In the first sentence of this section, the speaker tells the reader how good he is by telling how he places his fork and knife crosswise when he finishes eating to show that he remembers the death of Christ on the cross. The second sentence makes reference to the Arian doctrine which denied the Trinity. The speaker displays his belief in the Trinity and his stand against this Arian doctrine by drinking this orange juice in three sips instead of one gulp. Although these acts may appear minor, the speaker uses them to show that hi is better, in this case, than Brother Lawrence.
While these are the characteristics the speaker would have the reader believe he personifies in his life, these are not the characteristics he actually portrays to the reader. It is readily understandably that the speaker is not all he claims to be. The second sentence of the poem reveals the true character of the speaker: "If hate killed me, Brother Lawrence, / God's blood, Would not mine kill you!" Most people would not consider hate a characteristic of a good person, so the speaker "cuts his own throat," so to speak. Not only does he hate Brother Lawrence, but he carries it to the extreme by desiring to cause Brother Lawrence to stumble, and even bring about the damnation of his soul. Line fifty-three clearly exposes this desire:
"If I trip him just a-dying,
Sure of heaven as sure can be,
Spin him round and send him flying
Off to hell, a Manichee?"
Without a doubt, the speaker is not the good man he claims to be.
The speaker also attempts to impugn the character of Brother Lawrence by asserting that hi is a profane, sinful man. One of the methods employed by the speaker to accomplish that goal is to spread stories as to the motivation for the actions of Brother Lawrence. A paramount example of this is in the fourth stanza:
"Saint, forsooth! While brown Dolores
Squats outside the Convent bank
With Sanchicha, telling stories,
Steeping tresses in the tank,
Blue-black, lustrous, thick like horsehairs,
- Can't I see his dead eye glow,
Bright as 'twere a Barbary corsair's?
(That is, if he'd let it show!)"
This stanza makes reference to two of the nuns in the convent near the monastery. The women are apparently washing their hair and carrying on a conversation. The speaker accuses Brother Lawrence of lusting after these women, which is bad enough without taking into consideration that these men are monks, sworn to chastity. The speaker talks of the "light in the eyes" of Brother Lawrence. Yet the speaker goes on to say, "That is, if he'd let it show!" This suggests that there really is no evidence to support this accusation.
In all actuality, the text points to the fact that the speaker, deep down, knows that Brother Lawrence is not a hypocrite. The seventh stanza lends itself to establishing this point:
"There's a great text in Galatians,
Once you trip on it, entails
Twenty-nine distinct damnations,
One sure, if another fails.
If I trip him just a-dying,
Sure of heaven as sure can be,
Spin him round and send him flying
Off to hell, a Manichee?"
It is obvious that the speaker is attempting to cause Brother Lawrence to stumble when he speaks of tripping him as he is dying, in order to see that he goes to hell. The speaker goes to the Bible to find his sources for ways to trip Brother Lawrence, convinced that he will eventually find something to cause Brother Lawrence to falter. There are a couple of questions that arise from this stanza concerning the speaker's contention that Brother Lawrence is a hypocrite. First of all, if Brother Lawrence is a sinful hypocrite, why would the speaker need to cause him to stumble? He would already be going to hell without any help from the speaker. Secondly, the lines, "If I trip him just a-dying, / Sure of heaven as sure can be," seem to imply that the speaker believes that Brother Lawrence is headed for heaven unless something is done to cause him to stumble. These two arguments make a strong case for the idea that the speaker does not really believe that Brother Lawrence is a hypocrite, but rather the speaker is attempting to ruin the reputation of Brother Lawrence.
Indeed, Robert Browning weaves a tangled web of opinion and characterizations. The speaker obviously considers himself to be a good man, and yet he does not portray the characteristics that would cause the reader to have the same judgment. In the same manner, the speaker would have the reader believe that Brother Lawrence is an immoral hypocrite. Yet the evidence brings about the conclusion the Brother Lawrence is really a good man. It would seem that the speaker is jealous of the way Brother Lawrence lives, and therefore attempts to tear Brother Lawrence down in an attempt to raise himself up.
Published by Shawn Brewer
*AA, Florida College, 1994 *BS, CIS, Western Kentucky University, 1999 *Certificate in Distance Education, U of West Georgia, 2003 *2008 WKU IT Red Towel Award *2009-10 WKU Staff Leadership Institute *I... View profile
- How to Write Sixth Sense PoetryWhen most people think about a "sixth sense" they'll either think of psychics or a small child who sees dead people. When I think of a sixth sense, I think of the most wonderful sense of all: poetry.
- Meaning in Poetry: A Bloom's Lesson PlanPoetry is often a subject that makes students groan with disgust. This interactive and higher thinking approach presented in the Bloom's format may help get your students involved and thinking beyond how boring they...
- Slam Poetry: Is it More Than Rap?Slam poetry has risen to unbelievable heights in the last decade. Part of the reason for this mercurial rise in popularity undoubtedly must be attributed to the commonplace acceptance of hip hop and rap music.
- Why a Poet is Against National Poetry Month "As Such"Poetry keeps happening. Iin the United States where April is National Poetry Month. Poet Charles Bernstein thinks the celebration of poetry would be better served by an International Anti-Poetry Month. Read on for h...
Getting Your Poetry Read and Critiqued OnlineIf you like to write poetry, but you wonder if you have any real talent, get the opinions of others. Here's how to do so online.
- Make More Money Today with Celebrity Poetry
- Nature, Death and Immortality: The Poetry of Walt Whitman and Emily Dickinson
- Poetry by Aletha R. White
- MoonTownCafe.com: a Great Poetry Site!
- A Different Approach to Writing Poetry
- A-list Blogger Robert Scoble of Scobleizer Interviewed
- Robert Powell: A Valuable Asset to Both SRA and the Mankind Project
- The full text of the poem under discussion can be found at www.victorianweb.org/authors/rb/cloister.html.
- Robert Browning
- Soliloquy of the Spanish Cloister
- Poetry




4 Comments
Post a CommentThe use of 'our' and 'we' is used in the way that he believes that Brother Lawrence feels he is superior to everyone. It is used in the sense of the 'royal we', which is used by royalty (eg. We are going to bed now, let us go to bed). Hope this cleared a few things up.
Rachel, I believe you are missing the point this article is trying to make. You mention the narrator's focus on the women and the "scrofulous French novel". Yes, the novel belongs to the narrator, and yes, he is the one looking at the women. Does he not say, however, that he basically dares B.L. to glance at his novel? I believe that he is jealous of B.L. peace and acceptance. As we know from the ending, where he mentions the Devil, he wants to cause B.L.'s downfall - but why would he need to do that if B.L. was already tainted and impure? I think that he knows that B.L. is safe from damnation and he himself is not, and that's why he wants to send this man down in his place.
i do not think you are right.This switche in pronouns mayby due to the disturbant psychology of the speaker,he is projecting his behavior on B.L.Therefore he could be the one who is not good espicially that he can hate and harm and as the auther menntioned above spread unreal stories about a "Brother"
Interesting that no one else has commented on this. This analysis makes some great points, but I find it strange that the author did not discuss even the possibility that Brother Lawrence IS the narrator. Through stanzas 2 and 3, we are given pretty obvious hints to this: the narrator begins to stop referring to 'him' and 'he', and instead switches to the pronoun 'us' or 'our'. Especially line 23: "Marked with L for our initial!" Stanza 4 furthers this idea by showing us B.L.'s glowing eyes at the sight of the beautiful women, but didn't let it show - how else would the narrator know about this if he isn't the one doing the actions? In stanza 8, as he describes the sexual French novel, he says 'MY scrofulous French novel', not his! If he were so pure, why would the narrator have a 19th century smut novel?! The narrator then switches back and forth between first and third person, unable to maintain the facade. And, lastly, the title mentions that this is a Soliloquy (not really a