Anti-cancer compounds are now being tested by an in vitro initial screen by the National Cancer Institute instead of mice which used to claim nearly one million per year.
If something as important as anti cancer compounds are now not being tested on animals, then why is it that some companies still insist on testing common house hold products on caged rabbits. According to www.pandgkills.com, the laboratories at proctor and gamble are filled with rabbits whose eyes are forced open in order to apply products. Their fur is shaved so harmful chemicals and products can be applied directly to their skin. These practices are not necessary and can be completely avoided. According to www.allforanimals.com, "There is NO law that requires companies to test their personal care and household products on animals before selling them to consumers". So why is this barbaric practice still going on? The answer to that is simple. We, the consumers of the world are allowing it to happen. If we do not demand change then this practice will continue. To join the fight against animal testing there are simple things you can do. The most important thing is to not buy these products that are tested on animals. Products often include a "not tested on animals" statement on their packaging. Look for those products that clearly state they care enough to not torture animals. A listing of cruelty free companies can be found by going to allforanimals.com and following the links.
Published by Starlite
writing View profile
Animal Testing, Outdated and UnreliableThis essay is about animal testing and the methods that are used - and how useless, wasteful and ineffective they are. - The Realities of Animal Testing: a Practice that is Not NecessaryAnimal testing and experimentation has been going on since around the third and fourth centuries BC in Ancient Greece. But now that there are alternatives to testing on animals why are we still doing it?
- The Real Truth About Animal TestingAnimal Testing is often thought of as animals being mistreated and put through torturous tests, but the truth about animal testing is it is a regulated way to test the safety of products in a scientific way.
- Animal Testing in Research - Right or WrongThere are many pros and cons for the use of animal testing in research. Many people protest this type of research
- Humane Animal Testing: A Kinder AlternativeSome companies insist that animal research is a necessary evil. These ASPCA-inspired guidelines present the less-cruel alternative of humane animal testing.
- Animal Testing: Unnecessary Cruelty?
- Cruelty-free Products: Which Companies Do Not Test on Animals?
- Death to Animal Testing
- Animal Testing: Why it is Morally Offensive
- Buying Cruelty-free Makeup at the Drugstore
- Animal Testing Has No Place in a Modern Scientific Community
- Animal Rights: The Argument of Animal Testing

