Anonymous, Scientology, and the Story that the Media is Too Afraid to Tell

Brett Davison
The last half of my title is not a phrase usually associated with serious writers. It is a phrase that automatically triggers thoughts of conspiracies, tall tales, and the ramblings of all-around lunatics. However, I have no need to make up my own little conspiracy, one is already in place, plain as day. I do not need to tell tall tales because the truth of the matter is more ridiculous than anything I could possibly produce. I do not need to visit an insane asylum because frankly, compared to the conspiracy that is finally being confronted surpasses even the most insane fantasies. Don't believe me? What if I told you the name of this conspiracy? Scientology...for those of you who are not familiar with the history of this cult, I would recommend googling Lisa McPherson, Operation Snow White, and Operation Freakout.

The challenge to Scientology arose sometime during early January, when an online group known as Anonymous declared war upon the Church of Scientology. Anonymous is a leaderless organization of people who meet on the internet and adhere to a code as long as they identify themselves as "Anonymous." In the past, Anonymous's activity has been mostly limited to internet pranks. Some "renegades" as one member referred to them, have issued threats and even carried out cyber-terrorism. When Anonymous first began its attacks on Scientology, it seemed as if the organization would stick to its code, which declares that "Anonymous is devoid of humanity." Most activity was centered around causing trouble for Scientology in any way possible.

As its first united attack against Scientology, Anonymous shut down several major Scientology websites. After several days, the websites came back online. So, did the Church of Scientology find some way to defend itself against these "cyber-terrorists", as the Church calls them? Actually, no, the Church of Scientology was (and still is) completely at the mercy of Anonymous. So why did they stop? One YouTube video from a member of Anonymous suggests that Anonymous stopped hacking Scientology as a direct result of the words of Mark Bunker.

Mark Bunker is an Emmy award winner, an author, the founder of Xenu TV, and a long-time critic of the Church of Scientology, but most importantly, he is a gentleman. In a YouTube video adressed to Anonymous, Bunker expressed a gratitude for Anonymous's eagerness to take on Scientology but also a polite disaproval for the tactics that Anonymous was employing in its war against the cult. Mr. Bunker expressed a distaste for the "suppression of free speech" as well as any illegal actions. Bunker told Anonymous that Scientology was very serious and they were prepared not only to take anyone they deemed to be a "suppressive person" to court, but also to provoke them into doing something worth going to court over. More than anything else, Bunker expressed a need for all demonstrations to be completely peaceful.

Was it really Bunker that caused and end to the hacking of Scientology websites? I cannot say for certain that this was a direct result of Bunker's words, but I can say that shortly after he contacted Anonymous, the websites became fully functional once more. But it doesn't end there; soon, Bunker found himself flooded with emails expressing the thanks and support of various members of Anonymous. Since contacting them, Bunker has become known to Anonymous as "Wise Beard Man", to which Bunker responded with flawless impressions of Obi-Wan Kenobi. Today, Mark Bunker is widely revered by Anonymous as a sort of advisor.

Thus, Anonymous began to organize itself into a civilized, peaceful movement with its goals set. New YouTube videos made it clear that Anonymous had no problem with a person's right to believe in Scientology, but rather with the suppressive, corporate structure of Scientology that was willing to do anything to silence its enemies. Protestors were instructed to do nothing that could be interpreted as a crime and to peacefully comply with any demand made by the authorities. Thus, Anonymous prepared to launch a worldwide demonstration against Scientology on the tenth of February, the birthday of Lisa McPherson, who had died when Scientologists denied her proper medical treatment.

In my own life, February tenth came and went. I scanned the newspaper for any mention of the demonstration. I found nothing. I flipped through the news channels in search of any coverage of the event. Still, I found nothing. Finally, Last weekend, the weekend after the protest, I went on YouTube and searched for any videos related to the tenth of February. I was overwhelmed.

Through online videos, I discovered countless videos detailing the events of Lisa's birthday. After watching over a dozen videos, I concluded that protests had been staged in every major city in America and the British Isles along with a great many cities on the European continent and more still in Australia. I believe that protest were also held in South America and possibly even in Israel, but without any videos to confirm this, these remain mere speculation. The protests I watched all had many demonstrators, some of who even ventured out into the road to offer handouts to drivers who had slowed down or stopped. Picket signs often supported Xenu.com or whyaretheydead.net as sources of information and many protestors called for a renunciation of Scientology's tax-exempt status due to the fact that it operates like a bussiness. In fact, I soon discovered that there was even a protest in Sacramento, California which is a mere thirty-minute drive from my house.

So why wasn't I told about this? Why is it that the American media has remained alomst completely silent on this matter (the only exception I could find being a small report from Fox News)? The only answer I could find was that the media is afraid of a lawsuit, as it would be quite typical of Scientology to produce one. Fortunately, this is not the only chance for the American media to prove it still has some backbone. Anonymous has anounced that its next demonstration will be held on March fifteenth. I would encourage anyone reading this to contact their local radio programs and request that they do a study on Scientology, or better yet, contact your local congressman and request that Scientology's tax-empt status be revoked.

Links:http://www.dailymotion.com/SA-Anonymous/video/7341208 the road to Feb 10, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnQtiLz8ubI&NR=1 Washington DC, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zW466xcM0Yk&feature=related Xenu TV to Anon, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LozD5Stc9U&feature=related Hollywood, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltuR30xNHUo Australia

Published by Brett Davison

My name is Brett and I was born on October 12, 1991. I'm a Christian, a history geek, a philosopher, an otaku, and a writer.  View profile

77 Comments

Post a Comment
  • John Constantine11/23/2008

    I loved someone for twenty years of my life and they were ordered by Scientology to "disconnect" from me. Scientology separates family members and promotes fear and intolerance. Scientology is a cult, they hurt people, I know because I have been victimized by them. Scientology uses fear and intimidation to control people. Please shine the light on this cult of fear and stop them hurting others.

  • anon10/31/2008

    long cat is looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooonnnnngggggggggggggg

  • Noelle4/28/2008

    That was directed to the user "Empty Vessel," sorry. =0) The article itself was VERY good. The news media is now big business that we cannot trust. I've been explaining to hubby about CoS & Anon & he stated that CoS is very "1984." Exactly!!! Anyone who has the facts will see Scientology for what it is =0)

  • Noelle4/28/2008

    What has Scientology done that is evil??? Seriously??
    Please take a few minutes to scroll through this.

    Factnet is a place for "Discussion, Resources and Support for Survivor Recovery from the Abusive Practices of Religions and Cults"

    Human rights abuses specifically:
    http://www.factnet.org/Scientology/favresc.htm
    Overview including stories of survivors who got out alive:
    http://www.factnet.org/Scientology/dianetics.html

    Other very important sites:
    http://www.whyaretheydead.net/
    http://www.lermanet.com/faqs.html
    http://www.scientology-lies.com/

    There are court records, judges statements, hushed up settlements in wrongful death statements if you refuse to believe anything else.


  • Brett4/21/2008

    Actually, Anonymous has no website that it is bound to. There are dark aspects of Anonymous, but this is not because they are "dedicated" to anything, but rather because many Anons are offensive for the fun of it. And as someone who went to two of the protests, I can certainly tell you that Anonymous is more than a bunch of "kids."

  • Tammy Gowans4/14/2008

    Very interesting and well-written article. I've never understood why Scientologists are so defensive about their, uh, religion. Okay, that's only a half-truth. I think "organizations" like Anonymous just want to bring their egos down a notch. I personally think Scientology is based on LRH's common-sense view of life and how to treat others. He had a decent dose of self-intuitiveness. With that said, who the heck would bet their salvation on words written by a science fiction writer? (And this is coming from an atheist) I mean come one - Xenu and all of that far-fetched alien stuff made up by LRH? There's a line rational people should draw. Granted no one can say for sure how we all got here, or why we are here, but I don't think an alien made up by a writer is the answer. Of course, it only takes one person on a strong moral and power trip to devise a religion. Anyway, great story.

  • Empty Vessel4/5/2008

    So much fear... Why is it that when members of more established religions begin to fear others, they label the latter "cults". What exactly has Scientology done that is so insidiously evil? Anonymous has engaged in cyber-terrorism, loosely organized around central themes and principles; sounds a bit like al-Qaeda.

    The truth is Scinetology has never waged a war in the name of their prophets, where as Christianity and Islam (nand many other major world religions) have. There's one going on right now, isn't there?

    Perhaps if people more closely followed the tenets of their chosen religion, they would learn a thing called TOLERANCE (a very common theme in all religions before they are diluted by propaganda, inuendo, and misinterpretations). We do have a luxury by living in a free society and that is we are free to choose our religion and methods of worship.

    Anonymous is free as well to choose it's idealogy. That is another benefit of living in a free society. We can engage in open

  • Tony R.4/3/2008

    Excellent distillation of the story.

  • Sophielc3/24/2008

    I a vague notion of what scientology is and I would appreciate the media to cover this subject a bit more to raise awareness about this dangerous cult. How about less reality shows, more real news?

  • gmn173/20/2008

    same for www.petakillsanimals.com, no media coverage

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.