While the show Extreme Home Makeover has been on for years, they have remodeled many homes to deserving families in need. The show has been criticized by viewers however for building homes that are financially above the means of the families and the property taxes have been rising on the homes, making it harder for families to keep up with the extra expenses.
The show has admitted that they look for catching stories of struggle, families dealing with medical issues and those who have gone through loss or some sort of family tragedy that will captivate viewers. This is understandable, as the show is in it to help the families but also to make money off of sponsors and to get the most viewer ship possible. At the end of the business day, it is about business and what the families choose to do with the newly renovated home by Extreme Home Makeover is completely their choice.
In the case of the Vardon family, they had faced high medical bills and debt due to an autistic son. The father has also been recently laid off from their job, which is why they had initially refinanced the home for extra income to pay bills and cover son's medical expenses. In the current home mortgage crisis, they are not the only ones who have used their home as a collateral in order to cover medical bills or other unexpected financial issues. It is said that debt due to medical bills is the leading cause of bankruptcies in the US.
I understand that the show Extreme Home Makeover tries to do good by renovating and remodeling homes for families in need. In many cases, they build luxury homes from ground up for the families, and decorate them fully with furniture and other fine furnishings. The show has been criticized before for giving families too much, or going beyond what the families needs are in order to shock and awe the audience.
The families that qualify for the show Extreme Home Makeover just want a decent roof over their heads. I am sure that all of them would be perfectly happy in single family style homes like the rest of middle-class America lives in. However fine furnishings and luxurious homes can be beautiful to live in, as long as you do not try to use your home as a collateral to get out of a financial situation. Especially if you know the financial situation can jeopardize the home and all the luxuries inside of it, that you were given to for free in the first place.
Another issue I have with the luxury homes that are over the top for these families is that they are not economical. If these struggling families already have financial issues and problems paying current bills, how is a larger home that requires twice as much utilities going to help them? I just do not see how larger electricity and heating bills can help someone who should not be living above their needs. Extreme Home Makeover needs to build green homes, not Mini Mansions. While in this case, the problem was that the family refinanced the original loan and borrowed against their home, it is still not a solution for Extreme Home Makeover to give people homes they do not need. Giving someone tools to get out of debt and live a life of financial freedom would be more economical and better in the long run, than giving them a Mini Mansion they cannot afford to live in.
There is plenty of blame to go around in this story of the Vardon family. Their insurance would not cover their son's medical bills, which is true with so many other American families. While the show should not be responsible for digging the family out of the current situation, they should seriously re-evaluate the way they go about remodeling the homes. Perhaps bettering what the family already has would be more economical, rather than giving them a Mansion that goes above and beyond their financial situation.
Everyone, including myself, would love to live in a home of our dreams. However we live in the home that we can afford, that does not drain our budget and does not put us in critical situations where we face losing absolutely everything we own.
Original story can be found here:
Published by Nina Rotz
Nina Rotz is a freelance writer, a blogger and SEO extraodinaire. Nina's experience includes running a web hosting business, fourteen-year experience of website building, programming and blogging. Her educat... View profile
-
Extreme Spiritual Makeover
With an extreme spiritual makeover, you and only you can control what power the past has over your current life.
- Extreme Wedding for Extreme Makeover Surgeon People Magazine reveals that there's more to ABC's series Extreme Makeover than changing unexpected people's lives and giving them a sense of confidence and purpose that most likely had not had before being on the show.
-
Extreme Makeover: Philanthropy or Exploitation?
Some critics call Extreme Makeover Home Edition a type of broadcast exploitation of disadvantaged people. Is it? You be the judge.
-
Beavercreek Ohio Extreme Makeover to Air in November
In August the ABC show, Extreme Makeover Home Edition demolished and replaced the home of James Terpenning. The event drew thousands of spectators and hundreds of volunteers.
-
Extreme Makeover Demolition of Beavercreek Home a Smashing Success
The Beavercreek Ohio home of the Terpenning was demolished this week by Extreme Makeover Home Edition to make way for their new, wheelchair accessible house.
- Extreme Makeover Home Edition Features Beavercreek Family Nov. 8
- "Extreme Makeover" Homes Sold and Foreclosed Upon
- Extreme Makeover Foreclosure
- Grassroots Email Campaign to Ask Extreme Home Makeover to Build a New Home for Buf...
- Extreme Makeover : Home Editions Needs to Build Green
- How to Get a New House on Extreme Makeover: Home Edition
- Atlanta-based Professional Group Collaborates with an Interior Designer and the 'B...
|
|
3 Comments
Post a CommentVery good article. I always wondered what happened after the cameras stopped rolling. And I agree with Ben. That was a pretty dumb move.
Any idiot that takes out an equity loan on a free, paid-for home deserves what they get.
I have to agree with the criticism that the premise of this show - building lavish homes for families that are already struggling financially, is just another reflection of what's wrong with America. Each of these families could have benefitted from a 'better' home or one more suited to their special needs - they did not need the palaces they were given. In America we think opulence solves everything and we also think we shouldn't settle for 'good enough'. Making these folks better homes that were still modest, and maybe providing small, ongoing monetary support to ensure they can stay in them would be far superior t the drama of making a 'palace' with personalized rooms and parental 'retreats'. As someone paying high medical bills myself I know that kind of help is better than being given a huge heartache in the making.