The action came just a few weeks after a coalition of advocacy groups slammed L'Oreal and other beauty industry leaders for supposedly testing positive to harmful doses of lead in their lipsticks. This appears to be the latest chapter in a fight against the powerful beauty industry that might turn really ugly.
The request for the seizure came from the FDA on November 16, 2007, when a group of US Marshals confiscated 12,682 of Age Intervention Eyelash products that may cause decreased vision in some consumers.
The FDA doesn't regulate the cosmetic industry or other companies in the personal beauty industry, but the federal agency qualified Age Intervention Eyelash as "an unapproved and misbranded drug because (the company) has promoted the product to increase eyelash growth."
Also, Age Intervention Eyelash was labeled as an adulterated cosmetic by the federal agency because of the use of bimatoprost, "an active ingredient in an FDA-approved drug to treat (elevated pressure inside the eye)." Patients using the approved drug can be exposed to an overdose if they happen to use Age Intervention Eyelash.
The Campaign Report
The action by the FDA is something the Campaign For Safe Cosmetics - a coalition of consumer advocacy groups - would like to see done against the beauty industry in general. Just a few weeks before, on October 11, the Campaign came out with their own lab test report allegedly confirming unsafe levels of lead in lipstick manufactured in the United States.
"More than half of 33 brand-name lipsticks tested (61 percent) contained detectable levels of lead, with levels ranging from 0.03 to 0.65 parts per million (ppm). None of these lipsticks listed lead as an ingredient," a dangerous level and above the government's approved limit the group said in their press release.
The suspected culprits were manufactured by L'Oreal, Cover Girl, and Dior according to the coalition, whose actions have already prompted other 600 cosmetic and personal care product companies to sign a compact, pledging to "remove toxic chemicals and replace them with safer alternatives in every market they serve."
L'Oreal Reacts
A day after the coalition's press release, the FDA said it would look into the Campaign lab results. But L'Oreal did not want to wait and responded with a press release saying that "Despite continuous allegations over the years, lead is not intentionally added to cosmetics. Lead is a naturally occurring element that is found everywhere in the environment. Consumers are exposed daily to lead when they eat, drink water and breathe the air. The average amount of lead a woman would be exposed to when using cosmetics is 1,000 times less than the amount she would get from eating, breathing, and drinking water that meets Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) drinking water standards."
L'Oreal response spread quickly and caused an immediate reaction in other consumer advocacy groups, this one in a web log post in notjustaprettyface.org : "The titan of the beauty industry (L'Oreal) responded not by apologizing, not by promising to get the lead out, but by using the same old tired excuses: other products contain more lead than our products; we can't live in a lead-free world; and we're in 'full compliance with FDA regulations' - which isn't hard because THERE ARE NO REGULATIONS. How dumb does L'Oreal think we are? ...I guess we're just not worth it."
For now, Jan Marini Skin Research declared that "the company ceased manufacturing and shipping Age Intervention Eyelash product containing bimatoprost last year." But advocacy groups sure will continue raising the pressure against the use of dangerous chemicals in beauty products they say have been linked to cancer, birth defects and other health problems.
Dan Brizel "FDA News" Federal Drug Administration
"New Product Test Find Lead in Lipstick" The Campaign For Safe Cosmetics
"Statement by John Bailey, EVP for SCTFA" PRNewswire
Published by Dan Brizel
True glory consists in doing what deserves to be written; in writing what deserves to be read; and in so living as to make the world happier for our living in it. Pliny The Elder (23 AD - 79 AD). View profile
- Campaign for Safe Makeup Educates Consumers on Makeup SafetyBecause harmful ingredients are so common, it can be difficult to find healthy make-up. That's where the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics comes in.
- FDA Orders Tubes of the Product "Age Intervention Eyelash" SeizedThe US Food and Drug Administration had the US Marshall seize 12,000 tubes of Age Intervention Eyelash due to concerns over the products' safety.
- Avoid Lead in LipstickWorried about the lead in your lipstick? You may have another option.
- Personal Care Products that Are Dangerous to Your HealthClearasil as well as many other acne skin care products have some deadly chemicals in them. One is called sodium methylparaben, which has been banned in cosmetics by the European Union.
Cosmetics Could Be Harmful to Your Health: What Every Woman Needs to KnowPhthalates have been banned in cosmetics in the EU, but the U.S. is still holding out largely in part to pressure from large corporations and the lack of testing on humans.
- Campaign for Safe Cosmetics Calls for Lead to Be Removed from Lipstick
- Lead in Lipstick Gives Metal Mouth a New Meaning
- Is There Lead in Your Lipstick?
- One of Three Lipsticks High in Lead
- Study: Many Popular Lipsticks Contain High Levels of Lead
- Does Your Red Lipstick Contain Lead?
- Is Your Make-up Killing You?
- New Lab Tests Find Lead in Lipstick safecosmetics.org/newsroom/press.cfm?pressReleaseID=26
- U.S. Marshals seized 12,682 applicator tubes of Age Intervention Eyelash
- New Product Tests Find lead in Lipstick

2 Comments
Post a Commentit is not dat informative coz i already kno abt these things
This is truly scary!!..I so love my lipstick, foundation, blush etc... Very Informative info!!