You see, there are three main problems with the presumption that God uses natural disasters to punish humans for sin. One of them is biblical and the other two are derived from reason and just plain common sense.
The biblical contradiction to the idea that God would use storms as punishment for sin can be found in Matthew 5:45, which states the following: "That ye may be the children of your Father which is heaven; for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust" (KJV). This verse should make it quite obvious that God sends good and bad weather to everyone, regardless of the goodness or evilness of its recipients.
The second problem with the whole idea of God punishing sin with the use of natural disasters is the obvious randomness with which they occur. They occur in places where the majority of the people are practicing Christians just as often as they occur in places where the majority of the people are hostile to Christianity. This is consistent with the general fact that bad things often happen to good people, while good things often happen to evil people. That's just the way things work here on earth. Saying that God sends storms and other disasters because of wicked living is inconsistent with everything we can observe on a daily basis and flies in the face of logic and reason.
The third problem with the storms-as-punishment-for-evil mentality is the simple fact that, no matter how bad a given weather-related disaster is, we can usually check the record book and find one that was much worse years ago. If the world is growing more and more wicked, shouldn't calamities of nature be growing more and more fierce and intense? Wouldn't the record books have to be re-written every year or so? This is simply not the case, as we can almost always find records of worse disasters from the past, when there was supposedly less evil in the world.
Published by Terry Mitchell
I am a software engineer and blogger. You can now have any article and blog post I write for use in your book, newspaper, magazine, ezine, newsletter, website, or whatever. Go to my blog (see link below) and... View profile
- A Reverend's Take on the Science vs Religion DebateThe creative tension between science and religion is a good thing because it generates communication. However, scientists should speak from the laboratory, not the bully pulpit.
- Religion and Social LifeReligion can have a positive effect on someone social life and can lead to prosperity through religious group contacts. But even if you are religious, the benefits from your associations are not guaranteed.
Science & Religion CoexistI read Torrey Meeks' article about science trumping religion, and I couldn't help but wonder what might spawn such righteous indignation.- Religion Requires One to Think Outside the BoxThis article examines the traditional arguments that attempt to derail the religious institutions subsisting today and argue them by portraying the truth about religion being a form of faith not a science experiment.
Capital Punishment: Die Scum Die! In support of Capital Punishment
- The Nature and Purpose of Religion
- Jergens Natural Glow Daily Moisturizer Review
- Corporal Punishment in Schools
- Justinian and Christianity
- Ten Reasons Why You Should Not Buy Jason Natural Cosmetics Chemical Free Sun Block
- Organized Religion: The Fall of Intelligence
- What You Don't Know About Physical Punishment and Children's Discipline



