Are Prisons Cruel and Unusual Punishment?

Edward Raver
Within the history of organized societies, there has always been a need to remove some members of society from the population because their behavior/actions are unacceptable; in modern terms, we would call these individuals criminals. These criminals need to be watched, and an effort must be made to improve their behavior if they are to return to society as productive individuals- with this end in mind, the concept of the penitentiary first emerged several centuries ago (Meskell, 1999). With time, however, the charge has been leveled that prisons constitute "cruel and unusual" punishment. This essay will dispute that assertion with facts and a logical approach to the "cruel and unusual" argument.

First, the general concept of prisons, and indeed prisons that are properly secured and administered are not in and of themselves cruel or unusual; rather, these institutions offer educational opportunities, health care, spiritual guidance, counseling, recreation and the like in an attempt to give the prisoner a chance to improve their likelihood of a fruitful life after release from prison (Thies, 2000). When prisons become cruel and unusual punishment is when the inmates are allowed to run the asylum, so to speak. If violence, chaos and corruption are tolerated by prison staff and management, and disease and abuse are running rampant, then yes, the prison can and usually does become a bastion of cruelty. Something should also be said for the issue of torture, especially in the case of war prisoners of late. While the claim is often made that torture is necessary as a valid interrogation technique for prisoners of war, there still needs to be a fundamental decency within the prison that protects the human rights of everyone, guilty of crimes or not (Ward, 2004). Without this, society overall becomes cruel and unusual.

In summary, what can be said about the assertion that prisons are cruel and unusual is that while there are always exceptions to the rule and abuses of accepted norms, the properly functioning prison is necessary in society and far from cruel or unusual in its nature and intent.

References

Meskell, M. W. (1999). An American Resolution: The History of Prisons in the United States from 1777 to 1877. Stanford Law Review, 51(4), 839.
Thies, J. M. (2000, April). Prisons and Host Communities: DEBUNKING THE MYTHS AND BUILDING COMMUNITY RELATIONS. Corrections Today, 62, 136.
Ward, G. (2004). Punishing for a Living: More on the Cementing of Prisons. Social Justice, 31(1-2), 35+.

Published by Edward Raver

To briefly describe myself, I am a full time business professional, who enjoys freelance writing as a part time endeavor. I find it quite rewarding; moreover, my professional experience, education and intere...  View profile

2 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Stefano Tonali8/1/2008

    I couldn't finish in 1000 words.

  • Stefano Tonali8/1/2008

    The concept of prison reform is as old as the prisons themselves. It was thought that wayward individuals should be punished for their crimes. Some of the punishment metted out in the past was as cruel (or worse )than the crime commited. Society changes and with that so did the incarceration of law breakers. But to what extent? What do these people actually need in the prison enviroment? How far should government go to ensure the safety of society, as well as the safety of the inmates? When the government removes a person from society for its benefit, then it must care for that person. The inmate needs to be fed, but not necesarily fed well. It needs only be nutritious. They have physical needs that must be addressed as well. prisons have infirmaries for that purpose. Inmates do not need to have more benefits than those who they commited crimes against however. Recreational areas and weight rooms are the stuff of health clubs and should not be in prisons. Nor should television (cab

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.