How instructive was it that so much of the pageantry behind the games was just that - pageantry - a thin veneer covering a darker reality? A computer-aided fireworks display and a lip-synched Chinese National Anthem for the opening ceremony. How perfectly symbolic were these to kick off the games: the nation that invented fireworks, put on a display aided by technology and covered up the perceived imperfections of a 7-year old girl because she wasn't attractive enough. Add to this the possibility the Chinese government aided the Chinese Olympic Committee in putting under-aged gymnasts on their team and you have a pretty clear picture.
As part of the International Olympic Committee's approval for the Beijing games was the requirement there be protests allowed, and the Chinese government complied through providing an official protest area. There were 77 applications to protest received - a disproportionally small number to begin with, none of which were approved. There were also apparently 22 more inquiries. No wonder, then, that protesters took the show on the road and protested the torch relay. Curiously, 74% - or about 55 of the applications - were withdrawn because whatever the petitioner concerns were, they were "properly addressed by authorities." Yeah, things like labor abuses and government repression are usually just handed through having been addressed through proper channels. One Chinese pair - two women in their late 70's from the Chinese provinces - were sentenced to 2-years "re-education through labor" for having simply applied to protest.
If what happened to these two is any indication as to what may have happened as a result of the approximately 22 applications that were not withdrawn, it makes one wonder why there were so many applications filed to begin with. One suspects that perhaps that for an application to have been "properly addressed by authorities" was to have a goon squad show up at your front door and explain that part of the application fee would be at least 2-years in a labor camp.
This from a country that desperately wants to be accepted as a world leader, and has done it's best to demonstrate that it will behave responsibly and in accord with international norms. However, that's what I find most troubling. They have done their best, but they have responded; they haven't lead. They have accommodated demands and requests, but they haven't really understood the meaning of those demands and requests. They have complied with the letter, but not the spirit; they've complied but not accepted.
China drives the global economic bus and will for likely the next century. Their economy is no monolithic that if all the jobs in the US were exported there, they would STILL have a labor surplus. According to Manufacturing and Technology News in May 2006, the average Chinese manufacturing worker was making $0.57 an hour, $0.41 an hour if they were in the vast rural areas, meaning that for most of the world it's cheaper to buy their products - and because they have such a large labor surplus, it's unlikely that there will be any real wage inflation pressures any time soon.
Because it's cheaper to buy their products, their manufacturing sector is exponentially expanding; it can expand exponentially because there are so many surpluses built into the economy with little real regulation. And because their industry - like ours - is based on oil, the price will only continue to increase, affecting our industry and our ability to compete. The Chinese government can - and will - buy oil no matter what the price.
Given what we have learned about China over the three weeks of the XXIX Olympiad, does it give you any pause when next you buy an off priced item manufactured in China? Remember that you're paying for that item not only at the store, but at the gas pump; that those two little old ladies who wanted to protest the demolition of their homes are paying for that item with 2-years of forced labor. Those are just some of the hidden costs.
If it affects the glory and prestige of the motherland, the individual is sacrificed. What the Chinese government hasn't yet learned is that by allowing criticism of the development of the motherland, they actually gain prestige in the eyes of the rest of the world. If they have learned it, it means that they just don't care. Either way, you have to pay attention. This is not a government that shares internationally accepted norms of political dissent and individual freedoms.
Are you ready for a China century?
Published by Mo Morrissey
Mo has a lifetime of experience as a suffering Red Sox fan, but is a general jack of all trades. View profile
- Educational Barriers to an Increasing Hispanic Population in America and the Rise... With Hispanics and Asians poised to become the dominant race in America in the middle of our new century, will there be a disparity in providing them all with good educations in our nation's prestigious universities?
- Snapshot of U.S. Athletes and the 2008 Summer Olympic Games The 2008 Summer Olympic Games take place in Beijing, China, from August 8th through August 24th. The occasion marks the first time any Olympic Games (Summer or Winter) are held in China. The Olympic Torch Relay, dub...
- China Energy Needs! The major oil companies in China have signed billion dollar contracts for exploration and importation crude oil.The economic growth in China has increased demand for energy.
-
The Affect of $107 Per Barrel Oil Prices on Real Estate Investment
The record crude oil prices have noticeably altered the real estate investment equation. The results of this change will require the highest level of due diligence on the part o...
-
Tropical Storm Gustav Sends Oil Prices Soaring
The National Hurricane Center has issued a tropical storm Gustav public advisory that warns residents of Hispaniola to prepare for the impact of former tropical depression seven...
- The 2008 Summer Olympic Games in China
- The Dawn of the Chinese Century
- Google China Could Falter Under Chinese Censorship, Cyber Attacks
- China Becomes Free Market Powerhouse
- Big Red China Going on the Offensive
- China: Treaties, Opium Wars and Independence
- A Look at the Potential for China in Mid-Century
|
|
- 10 things you need to know today: February 11, 2012 (The Week)
- Grammy Awards preview: Top 5 reasons to watch (The Week)
- No Fun Allowed: L.A. Beaches Ban Footballs, Frisbees, and Sand Digging (ContributorNetwork)
- Good day, bad day: February 10, 2012 (The Week)
- Obama's birth control compromise: 'Still unacceptable'? (The Week)
4 Comments
Post a CommentNice job Mo! For all the pomp and circumstance that the Chinese promised in terms of access and acceptance, the colors stayed the same.
Excellent work Mo.
Excellent article. The Chinese people have a long way to go, and the Chinese government has a lot to learn about truth and democracy.
Well done. It is a downward spiral. We need to buy those goods to afford our standard of living, but it hurts us in the long term.