Are Smart Stay-at-Home Moms Wasting Their Brains?

Desperately Brainy Housewives and the Experts Who Hate Them

Paula Neal Mooney
There's been a big debate lately about college-educated housewives, and if we're wasting our brains and baccalaureates by abandoning good jobs to wipe little noses and butts all day. It started with Linda Hirshman's "Homeward Bound" article in The American Prospect, wherein she decried homemaking as a detrimental road leading to a "demonstrable future loss of income, power, and security for the woman who quits."

Intense reaction to the piece landed Hirshman in "Good Morning America" segments that engaged career, hybrid and at-home moms in side-by-side tête-à-têtes. One homemaker was asked if she feared her husband leaving her destitute. Hesitating slightly, a nanosecond of silence masking her dumbfounded state, she offered a terse and defensive, "No."

If only she'd let down her more-motherly-than-thou guard long enough to tell the truth: that some of us save promising want ads until late-afternoon lessons with our kids compel us to toss them. That after heated fights with our husbands, we stare into nothingness and long for the freedom our discarded dollars might have bought, mentally calculating the months since the end date of the last "real job" on our resumes. That sometimes we ask: What the hell have I done?

When Two Bucks Become One
Housewives of the 1960s and '70s weren't experiencing this dilemma; they were escaping their kitchens and storming boardrooms, copies of Betty Friedan's 1963 call-to-work manifesto, The Feminine Mystique, tucked into their rigid Samsonite briefcases.

Of the 5.6 million moms who stayed home in 2005, I bet a good deal of them are like me, still reeling from the emotional upheaval that accompanies losing one's entire income to rely completely on that of another. My question is: If those ERA-fueled ladies of yesteryear gained economic parity, greater independence and more autonomy by joining the rat race, have contemporary women who've opted-out now lost all those same things?

Money, Power, Respect
I sought out The Feminine Mystique for answers to my middle-class angst, to the "problem that has no name." In it Friedan admits that monetary fulfillment isn't everything, but writes in the epilogue that "only economic independence can free a woman…"

I agree that money is key; I won't go so far as to call it king. Education is also a strong factor, but not a cure all. One lawyer-turned-homemaker said she wanted her daughter be career-focused, as if that would insulate her from economic dependence. "But when she gets married and has kids…and if she doesn't want to put them in day care…" I trailed off, both of us speechlessly understanding the cyclical conundrum.

Marrying Up, Divorcing Down
Betrothing ourselves to business bigwigs isn't the bottom line either, though you wouldn't know it from the way some of us spout off our husbands' company names and job titles as social-status markers. I've known homemakers whose mates made decent salaries but refused to give their wives credit cards or much cash. Some full-time moms bank on the divorce card. One well-to-do wife pointed out her hot nanny's piece-of-crap car to her husband in case he ever developed designs on the young lady. "That's what you'll be driving, because I'll have everything else," she warned.

You Gotta Serve Somebody
Call me a romantic (or a proud and stubborn fool), but I'm determined to be a mom contributing serious cha-ching to the household income, with enough flex-time to still pick up my kids from school. Like Julie Aigner-Clark, who, as a stay-at-home mother, noticed a need to expose tots to the arts. Using $15,000 and borrowed equipment, she filmed in her basement the first two videos in the wildly successful Baby Einstein series, a brand she later sold to Disney for an estimated $20 million.

Even when I'm rich and famous, I won't put my security in fabulous lucre alone. Economies downturn, companies downsize. Black Mondays send "Masters of the Universe" sailing out of high-rise windows. This is where get-to-work experts get the equation wrong and discount the intangible value of housewifery, so busy are they calculating our "million dollar mommy tax." Yes, at-home childcare should be recognized as valuable work and compensated accordingly, but I'm not banking on Uncle Sam to cover my arrears. I subscribe to a fishes-and-loaves theory that says one plus one doesn't always equal two. Sometimes it equals a thousand.

I'd be lying if I said the resurrected hotbed issue hasn't made me rethink my working status. Maybe it is time to start chasing bigger bylines from the vantage point of a cluttered desk outside my house. But when I do, it won't be from financial fear-mongering, but because I'm walking head first into the door opened unto me at the perfect time - not by the hardworking and well-connected bridegroom who is the conduit of my current prosperity, but by the only One who has kept me all along.

Paula Neal Mooney is editor-in-chief of Real Moms magazine.

Published by Paula Neal Mooney

Paula Neal Mooney is owner of Plunder LLC, a media and publishing company. A screenwriter and journalist for major websites like Yahoo and Examiner, Paula has also been published in various national print...  View profile

  • Stay-at-home moms, click here to join Associated Content and get paid to write articles like this.
  • Full-time, stay-at-home moms raised more than 11.2 million children in 2005...
  • ...an increase of more than 41,000 children from 2004...
  • ...and we are not all killing our neurons!
The Dutch Labor Party is considering making educated housewives pay back a portion of the money it cost to educate them!

14 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Sharon Van Gaskin12/17/2006

    If SAHMs are "wasting their brains" then what is the opinion of the people they entrust their child to each day? Can they identify a care provider as someone "good enough" to watch their child but not "good enough" to choose a "career" that they have?

  • Sharon Van Gaskin12/17/2006

    Great, great article!! I'm probably in a small subset of WAHMs (I'm currently a homeschooling SAHM-PT WAHM). I had no career to "give up" because I had my daughter just 1 year after finishing grad school. I'm in a dying category of parents-those who had kids in their mid-20s (or even 20s).

  • Darcy DeMarco9/26/2006

    I understand where the author is coming from. I cannot blame her for her fears. I was a housewife for several years, and there were drawbacks such as those mentioned. But, I do think that it is best for children to be at home with their mother, or some family member. Perhaps if more relationships were based on truly relating, rather than on power, the women the author mentions would not find themselves in such a negative position. People tend to press when they feel themselves dominant, and therein lies the problem.I do agree with Zane Ewton that "intelligent mothers are valuable anywhere."

  • Nikki Freeman9/25/2006

    Great Article...Very interesting read :) -Christina

  • Sherri Granato9/24/2006

    This is a great article, and nicely done. I only see one problem for 'stay at home moms', and that is falling out of the loop. There skills become rusty, and when they wish to return to the job force they are slightly insecure about being out of touch. Technology changes so quickly that some skills become out of date real quick, forcing them to either go back to school or accept a lower paying job. Other then that, staying at home can be harder than some actual paying jobs.

  • Cortney Philip9/24/2006

    Cool article. The real divide comes from how we perceive work. In this culture, people equate work with wage labor. Instead of money determining worth, why not the amount of good someone does for the world? Why can't raising kids, making art, or living a spiritual life (monk-hood, etc.)count as valuable contributions? Because it's not just raising babies that makes others consider you a waste of intelligence--it's any pursuit that doesn't involve a paycheck at the end of the week.

  • dreahwrites9/24/2006

    As a stay at home mom who gave up what was a lucrative work FROM home job to homeschool, I am now trying to find my middle ground between work from home, stay at home, and educate at home.

    I can't paint murals in clients houses and get home in time for the school bus anymore, But I can paint at home and write about it.

    I haven't exactly find my niche yet, but it is in there somewhere. I am content, my husband and kids are happy, and the general public still does not care... all they hear is the word HOME... and don't even mention the IQ points... that just makes them tsk tsk for the silly woman with the wasted intelligence.

  • April Gilford9/24/2006

    All I have wanted to do since my son was born was be a stay-at-home mom. I am now a work-from-home mom as my husband's income is not enough, so I have had to find a middle-ground. With an IQ above the 99th percentile, I could do anything I want. To that end, I want to be the best wife and mother I can possibly be.

  • J.C. Hagan9/24/2006

    I liked this article. It's a shame that far too many feminists fail to realize that a stay-at-home mother who nurtures her children can do infinitely more good than if she put the kids in care and worked a 9-to-5. On the same token, it's also a shame that too many men feel too "proud" to be a stay-at-home dad.

  • Paula Neal Mooney9/16/2006

    Wow...I'm so blessed by all these intelligent comments. Yes, I believe this will always be a hotbed issue. Lack of respect for homemaking is one of the reasons I tell people I'm a freelance writer. That provokes much more interest than saying I'm a stay-at-home mom!

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.