Arizona's Immigration Law: What You Need to Know
A Criminal Prosecutor's Look at the Most Controversial Provisions
Purpose - According to the Arizona State Senate Fact Sheet for Immigration Law S.B.1070, the law now requires state law enforcement officers to fully comply with and assist in the enforcement of federal immigration laws It establishes as as state crimes, crimes involving trespassing by illegal aliens, stopping to hire or soliciting work under specified circumstances, and transporting, harboring or concealing unlawful aliens, and their respective penalties.
Who Passed the New Arizona Law - The new bill passed the Arizona House of Representatives on April 13 by a 35-21 party-line vote. The Bill passed the State Senate with a 17-11 vote that closely followed party lineswith all but one Republican voting for the bill, ten Democrats voting against the bill, and two Democrats not voting. A telephone survey by the Rasmussen Group found that 70% of Arizona voters approve of the new law, while 23% oppose it. National political reaction to the Arizona Law has split along party lines.
Does the New Law Require Aliens to Carry Their Registration Papers With Them?- Yes and no. Since 1940 under the federal criminal code, aliens over 18 years of age in the United States have always been required to carry their registration papers on them at all times. Basically, the new Arizona Immigration Law allows State of Arizona law enforcement personnel to enforce this federal law by making it a state offense as well as a federal offense. The federal law is punishable upon conviction for each offense with a fine not to exceed $100 or imprisonment for not more than thirty days, or both.
Who Decides What "Reasonable Suspicion" Is? - An officer's "reasonable suspicion" that a person is an illegal alien must be based on facts that the officer can articulate and, if challenged in court, must be able to articulate. It cannot be based on "mere suspicions". The words "reasonable suspicion" are legal words of art. Since the 1960's there have been thousands of court cases define what these two words mean and these precedents comprise the factors that can be used to determine if "reasonable suspicion" exists or doesn't exist. All police officers since the late 1960's are trained and undergo continuing education on what the words "reasonable suspicion" legally mean. The Arizona Immigration Law does state that race, color or ethnicity does not constitute reasonable suspicion of illegal presence in the U.S.
Is the Arizona Immigration Law Constitutional? - As to the two main provisions of the new Arizona Immigration Law, first, the requirement for aliens to carry registration papers and second, the right extended to state police officers to in effect enforce the already existing federal law upon "reasonable suspicion", the provisions are Constitutional and should survive any challenge. From a legal standpoint, these two provisions by themselves do nothing but allow State of Arizona to enforce certain provisions of the federal code. Arizona accomplishes this by "borrowing" federal law and enacting it as Arizona state law. Why pass the law at all? Illegal immigrant's are a big and expensive problem in Arizona.and this law reflects Arizona's belief that the federal government is not enforcing it's own federal immigration laws sufficiently.
AC Law is career criminal prosecutor with over twenty years experience.
Arizona Immigration Law, S.B. 1070
8 U.S.C. 12-2-7 section 1304(e).
Donna Rossi, (4-14-10), "Immigration Bill Takes a Huge Step Forward". KPHO-TV, www.kpho.com/news
KPHO-TV, Ariz. Lawmakers Pass Controversial Illegal Immigration Bill". KPHO-TV. April 20, 2010. KPHO-TV, Arizona Lawmakers Pass Controversial Immigration Bill, April 20, 2010, www.kpho.com/politics/23179490/detail.html.
Rasmussen Report, 70% of Arizona Voters Favor New State Measure Cracking Down On Illegal Immigration, http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/arizona/70_of_arizona_voters_favor_new_state_measure_cracking_down_on_illegal_immigration
Published by AC LAW
A. C. Law is a free lance writer/artist/photographer living in Ogden Dunes. Ogden Dunes is the best beach village on Lake Michigan. Come visit some time! View profile
Arizona Immigration Law: AZ Deputy Shot by Illegals?New factors are in play as the nationwide debate over the Arizona immigration law continues. An Arizona deputy has been wounded while on patrol. Various prominent figures speak...
Arizona Immigration Law: Tom Tancredo is for the Law (Video)Former Congressman Tom Tancredo (R) spoke on Fox News from Colorado Springs Saturday (5/01/10) to set the record straight on why he actually supports the Arizona immigration law...
CA Lieutenant Governor Candidate Hahn Commits Historical Faux Pas Over A...Los Angeles Councilwoman Janice Hahn has an eye on the position of lieutenant governor. In an effort to make her displeasure heard over the recent Arizona immigration law, she c...
Arizona Immigration Law Takes on Broader PerspectiveState and Federal officials are reacting both for and against the new Arizona immigration law set to go into effect mid-summer. Links to new articles plus a videotape are provi...- How Will the Arizona Immigration Law Affect Civil Liberties?The Arizona Immigration Law was passed on April 23rd, 2010. It is basically a legalized form of Racial Profiling which has many concerned. Here is my take on the issue
- Arizona's Immigration Law is a Step in the Right Direction
- Why Arizona Immigration Law SB 1070 is Causing National Outrage
- Arizona Immigration Law: Hillary Clinton Speaks Out
- Arizona Immigration Law: Obama, Holder, McCain and Palin Offer Viewpoints
- Arizona Immigration Law: Pros and Cons Vigorously Debated
- The Arizona Immigration Law, Through the Eyes of an Arizona Native
- A Comparison of Criminal Justice Systems
- What is "reasonable suspicion"?
- Who can be stopped and why?
- Reaction to the law falls along political lines.


2 Comments
Post a CommentScott, thanks for your comment. When I stated the statute was Constitutional I referred only to the key passages I wrote the article on. I have no view on whether the rest of it will pass Constitutional muster. When I said reaction falls along political lines, I am acknowledging that there will be noteworthy exceptions to this general observation as you correctly point out.
"Reaction to the law falls along political lines." Um, no. Even some of the most diehard right-wing Republicans (Tom Tancredo, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio) have spoken out against this law. Lindsay Graham and Karl Rove acknowledge it's unconstitutional.