Bad Day at Dardenne Prairie

The Case for a New Megan's Law

Mark Stuart ELLISON
The death of Megan Meier is a stark example of how far our laws lag behind internet technology. Immediate Federal intervention is required to prevent similar tragedies.

On October 16, 2006, 13-year-old Megan Meier committed suicide after exchanging a series of messages with someone she thought was a romantic teenage admirer named "Josh". But "Josh" was actually the parents of an ex-best friend of Megan's with whom Miss Meier had had a falling out. The perpetrators of this internet hoax first gained Megan's affection, and then bombarded her with increasingly insulting messages, culminating with the statement that "the world would be a better place without you," as reported in a November 17, 2007 Chicago Tribune online article.

According to a November 17, 2007 CBS News article online, Megan Meier suffered from depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. She was on medication, and, according to her parents, was doing well before her experience on MySpace drove her to hang herself in a closet.

Megan lived in Dardenne Prairie, Missouri, a town of 7,000 outside of St. Louis. According to The Tribune, Megan's story did not become well known until a local newspaper, The Suburban Journal, published a story on the case last week.

I like small towns; I've lived in a couple of them. Life is slower and people are generally friendlier. There's usually less noise, and you tend to sleep better than in a big city. But these seemingly idyllic places can have a dark underside: small-minded people. I can think of a couple of former small-town neighbors who are capable of doing what Megan's ex-friend's parents did. When hateful, immature adults exact revenge on a child, anything can happen.

According to news reports, Megan's parents were attentive to her needs. They monitored her activities on MySpace, and when she became upset about "Josh", ordered her to discontinue her correspondence.

After Megan's death, Ron and Tina Meier, separated. They are contemplating a civil suit against the ex-friend's parents. Those people should be slapped with a wrongful death judgment for every penny they have. They should also spend some serious time behind bars. The problem is, nobody knows what to charge them with.

An FBI report has been prepared, but no Federal charges have been forthcoming. According to The Tribune, the Federal statute against internet harassment covers only direct messages such as email, not the type of postings on MySpace that drove Megan to her death. The County Sheriff has found that no crime has been committed. With strong support from Mayor Pam Fogarty, the Dardenne Prairie City Council has proposed a local law making this type of internet harassment a misdemeanor punishable by 90 days in jail and a $500 fine. Mayor Fogarty is frustrated by the inadequacy of the punishment. It also does Megan's parents no good because it can't be applied to the Meier case since ex-post facto laws are unconstitutional.

In an attempt to protect the hoaxsters from harm, the Suburban Journal and other news outlets have not published their names. That hasn't prevented bloggers from finding out who they are, excoriating, and even threatening them with violence. A November 21, 2007 online article in USA Today has described this phenomenon as "internet shaming", a high-tech version of vigilantism. Mayor Fogarty has rightly condemned this practice.

As far as I'm concerned, the people who drove 13-year-old Megan to her death are killers. They deliberately set out to hurt her in a big way and knew, or should have known, that someone of Megan's age and fragility would react the way she did.

That said, we are a nation of laws, not mobs. This is 21st century America, not mid-19th century Dodge City. Civilized people fight perpetrators in court, not on the street. In the U.S., only courts can dispense justice, not self-appointed enforcers. O.J. Simpson recently tried to play that role, and now he's facing the possibility of spending decades behind bars.

This case cries out for justice, not vengeance. Criminal investigations are continuing, but given the current state of the law, do not look promising. Given the ubiquity of cyberspace, only the Federal government has the power to enact laws with teeth to combat this problem. It's high time that it did so.

Published by Mark Stuart ELLISON

I have worked as a lawyer, reporter, and freelance writer. My award-winning first novel, Dear Mom, Dad & Ethel: World War II through the Eyes of a Radio Man, was published in 2004 and reissued in 2006. Pleas...  View profile

  • Megan Meier hung herself after being harassed on MySpace by adults posing as a teen love interest.
  • The adults have not been charged with a crime and have been threatened by angry bloggers.
  • This case cries out for Federal intervention.
The Federal internet harassment law only covers direct messages, not ones posted on sites like MySpace.

6 Comments

Post a Comment
  • mike4/4/2008

    this was debunked as a hoax

  • Tabitha Fleming12/25/2007

    I'm not sure I agree that anyone who intentionally causes the death of another person through communication of any kind gets put away. However, this communication came from an ADULT and was aimed at a CHILD, making this a case of child abuse and assault on a minor that is inexcusable.
    A sad day for sure, and the people responsible have shown basically no remorse whatsoever. I pity their own daughter.

  • cathiesbloggs11/23/2007

    OH My God!...what a horrible tragedy!!..these people that did this to this little girl should be prosecuted..These were adults!...this even made it more crazy!!..Thank you for sharing this with us!!

  • Mark Stuart ELLISON11/23/2007

    I'm certainly not an expert on this subject, but it seems like a common law theory of harassment would apply. The punishment wouldn't fit the dastardliness of the crime, but it would be better than nothing. There should be a Federal law that says anyone who intentionally causes the death of another person through communication of any kind gets put away for ten years. It would be three-to-five if he or she causes severe physical or emotional injury. However, the burden of proof would have to be high in order to protect against fraud.

  • Gary Picariello11/23/2007

    I'm at a loss for words on this one. What a tragic loss. I don't know what the solution is. You just never know who is on the other side -- whether it's a cell phone or the internet. Powerful article.

  • Carol Bengle Gilbert11/22/2007

    Someone should take a close look at the common law and see what crimes may have been committed apart from the medium.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.