Bankrupt Lehman Bros. To Pay Staffers $2.5 Billion in Bonuses; Is Still Hiring Despite Debacle
Barclays Bank to Acquire Failed Investment Bank; Will Pay Tens of Millions in Salary to Top 30 Staffers
Despite the recent debacle, Lehman Brothers -- the fourth largest investment bank in the United States when it failed, ranking as the biggest bankruptcy in history -- is still recruiting and hiring employees for its American and Indian operations. The Japanese brokerage Nomura Holdings acquired Lehman Brothers' Asian units in a deal valued at $225 million. The firm's European operations are still in limbo.
Lehman Brothers' American operation is being acquired by Barclays Bank for $1.75 billion, $750 million less than the bonus pool. Barclays Bank has agreed to permit the payout of the bonuses as it is keen to retain key Lehman Brothers, whom it considers the investment bank's greatest assets. Barclays is negotiating new contracts with 30 key employees said to be worth in the nine figures. The value of the acquisition may only be $1.35 billion due to fluctuations in the value of the underlying assets. The bulk of the deal is the $960 million Barclays is paying to acquire Lehman Brother's office tower near Manhattan's Time Square.
The bonus culture of the New York investment banks and financial sector is a target of critics of the free-wheeling, unregulated capitalism that has flourished since at least the Ronald Reagan era. With the advent of a Republican Congress in 1995 and then Republican George W. Bush becoming President in 2001, regulation of the financial sector was pared back until, during the years of the second Bush, Wall St. enjoyed the unfettered excesses of the Roaring Twenties. That era ended with a crash, too. (Ironically, Bush's grandfather Prescott Bush was a principal of Brown Brothers Harriman, a white shoe brokerage. The soul of the old boy is probably spinning in his grave, frustrated at his inability to take a crack at such a market.)
Barclays Bank currently is negotiating employment contracts worth tens of millions of dollars to retain the very same employees who bankrupted the 158-year-old Lehman Brothers Barclays is guaranteeing the firm's bonus pool, which could be worth almost twice as much as the company has been valued as, as the remuneration and bonuses paid to key executives and staff on Wall St. typically are paid whether the employees' strategies or performance were successful or not.
As the federal government's proposed bailout of Wall St. shows, the irresponsible pursuit of high risk investment strategies has not only been handsomely rewarded by the boards of directors of financial institutions, but those rewards will be guaranteed by the American tax payer. Individual American taxpayers are -- along with their children and their offspring on the line for thousands of dollars, individually. In the short-term, Americans will pay for this debacle with higher inflation, lower credit, and a stagnating economy. Japan, which went through a similar collapse of its huge banks over a decade ago (an example ignored by Congress in its lust for deregulation) went into an actual economic depression for six years.
The United States has adopted a culture where profits are to be kept firmly in the private sector while losses are to be borne by the public sector. This is a sobering thought, realizing that the next great market being engineered by Wall St. are infrastructure funds, in which state and local governments will cede ownership over assets such as roads and bridges that will be built on a for-profit basis by the private sector.
Sources:
The Economic Times, "'Bankrupt' Lehman Brothers on hiring spree!"
The Independent, "Fury at $2.5bn bonus for Lehman's New York staff"
Published by Jon C. Hopwood
Jon C. Hopwood is a freelance journalist and editor living in the Greater Boston Metropolitan Area. He has written extensively on current events, history, politics and the cinema. View profile
- Lehman Brothers Declaring Bankruptcy Big American Investment Bank declares bankruptcy and the A,B,C's of how it affects everyone
- Risks and Rewards of Securities Underwriting: Commercial Banks vs Investment Houses Commercial banks received full underwriting powers around 1999. However, some still preceive such power as a conflict of interest, as well as risky to investors.
-
Pay Freeze for White House Salaries Marks Obama's First Day in the Oval...
On Obama's First Day in office, he took the steps to issue a pay freeze. The pay freeze will affect White House salaries and put a basic cap on how much the White House staff ca...
- Investment Ideas for People with Little Money You don't have to have tons of money like Donald Trump to become investment savvy. You can be a normal hard working American and still find ways to start saving and investing your money.
- Lehman Brothers Bankruptcy: Three Months Ago Today, the 'Economic Crisis' Unoffici... How long does it seem that the economic crisis has lasted. Based on Lehman Brothers falling apart, it's three months ago today.
- Wall St. Hopes for Windfall from Bailout; Financiers Ready to Cash in as Taxpayers...
- Investment Banks Not Officially Banks
- Investment Banks in Global Crisis
- Why Main Street Bank Depositors Should Hold Investment Banks Responsible If Their...
- Big Winner in Lehman's Bust is Barclays Bank
- The Failure of Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and AIG: Is Another Great Depression...
- The Nationalization of the Investment Banking Industry
|
|
2 Comments
Post a CommentThe Bank of Melvin! I love it!
Excellent article. I think that management (for lack of other words) of Lehman Bros should be held accountable. Another words, those who set the policies that led to bankrupcy. However, I'm not so sure about those who worked withing the guide lines of those policies. I'm waiting for some details concerning the bailout now being considered by Congress. The proposal is by no means a done deal. I still think that, at this point, the bailout is the only choice. Allowing the global economic deep recession would punish the taxpayers far more severely than the bailout. The de-regulation contributed to this problem in the sense that it allowed the situation to develop. But it was the decisions by management that directly caused the problems. We cannot afford to allow this chain of events (bankrupcy of investment firms) to continue.