Banned PETA Superbowl Commercial Too Explicit for TV?

Watch the Video and Decide If NBC Made the Right Call

Carly Hart
PETA is no stranger to controversy, and PETA's Superbowl commercial has pushed the notion of sex sells a bit too far for NBC. According to US News and World Report, NBC found the PETA Superbowl commercial so sexually charged and offensive that it is banned from the Superbowl ad line up. If you haven't seen the banned PETA ad, you can see it clicking on the source below. Just what makes this ad so sexually charged that NBC would refuse to air it? PETA promotes a vegetarian lifestyle and this ad depicts attractive, scantily clad models bumping and grinding vegetables, among other sexually suggestive scenes, along with the message that studies show that vegetarians have better sex.

Is NBC trying to avoid controversy? Remember Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction 5 years ago?

It was just five years ago that the Superbowl was mired in a scandal involving Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake. As they sung to the lyrics of "Rock Your Body", the lyrics rung true as Justin Timberlake grabbed at Janet Jackson's bodice and sung that he was "gonna have you naked by the end of this song." Sure enough, it was the breast pop heard and seen around the world, and prompted a FCC investigation into the incident. Both denied prior planning of the now infamous wardrobe malfunction and the fine against CBS Network was eventually reversed. The wardrobe malfunction incident, from start to finish, lasted 4-1/2 years by the time the FCC reversed the fine and litigation ceased.

Perhaps NBC ad executives did make the right call. Surely the sexually charged PETA ads wouldn't mesh well with the Superbowl's family friendly gridiron action? Many Pittsburgh Steelers fans live in Pennsylvania, which, as anyone who followed the 2008 presidential election knows, is rife with constituents who cling to their religion (and their guns). Seeing sexy models rubbing eggplants, pumpkins and asparagus suggestively on their body may not sit well with the evangelical fans. Considering that the crux of the Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction was in response to the notion that the Superbowl was a family friendly television event, it goes without saying that models fornicating with vegetables might not be well received by a father and young son trying to enjoy the game.

Sources:

View the video here: http://www.usnews.com/blogs/fresh-greens/2009/01/27/hot-peta-ad-banned-from-superbowl-sex-doesnt-sell.html

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1424036/janet_jackson_wardrobe_malfunction.html?cat=14

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/915577/fcc_fine_reversal_for_cbss_super_bowl.html?cat=17

Published by Carly Hart

One of AC's Top 1000 Content Producers, Carly Hart's interests include news, politics, parenting, frugal living and consumer related issues. A Featured Contributor in the Shopping and Fashion category, she...  View profile

  • Superbowl commercials are supposed to be funny, not sexed up.
PETA's banned commercial can be seen on the US News link provided at the end of the article. You be the judge whether or not NBC made the right decision to ban it from airing during the Superbowl.

13 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Sheri Fresonke Harper2/6/2009

    Interesting :) Sheri

  • Sylvia Cochran1/31/2009

    NBC trying to avoid controversy? LOL! Great article!

  • Hartley Engel1/29/2009

    It's extremely inappropriate for family television. I'm surprised PETA thought they could get away with it. Excellent report!

  • Sheryl Young1/29/2009

    This commercial is making more news for being banned than if it got aired, probably!

  • Carol Bengle Gilbert1/28/2009

    How bizzarre! PETA is insane to try to air an ad like this.

  • Carly Hart1/28/2009

    Guns and broccoli - I was raised in PA, I know all about gun totin'! I don't think Pennsylvanians are ready to give up their meat (or guns). :)

  • Guns and broccoli1/28/2009

    Maybe we non-guntoting, secular Pennsylvanians can compromise and begin clinging to green, leafy products instead.

  • Mr. Dave1/28/2009

    I wasn't sure about the whole PETA thing but now that I watched the commercials, I am beginning to really question that organisation. What level of intelligence does it take to realise that children will be watching the super bowl. PETA is supposed to be an organisation that is supposed to be fighting for ethical treatment of animals. I think ethical treatment of animals and appropriate TV commercials go hand in hand. If you want to be fair to animals, you have to be fair to children at the same time or be a hypocrite. If PETA cannot realise that the commercial is suited for the audience, it makes me really question the authenticity of the entire organisation. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realise that the best place for that commercial is in a show that grown-ups will watch without their children.

  • Colleen Starr1/28/2009

    I disagree with the decision but I don't work for NBC so, my opinion doesn't matter. There have been other sexually suggestive commercials in the past Super Bowls. Great report =)

  • Agnes Farside1/28/2009

    I didnt' watch it, but sounds like it should be banned.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.