During this time of great strides and milestones, many members of the same Party that nominated Barack Obama scramble to hide the middle name of their Party's nominee. In a sad testament to Free speech, many whom claim to champion equal rights for all demonize those that utter the man's name in full.
Most reasonable Americans understand the implications of Obama's full name. Doesn't embracing a man regardless of the color of his skin or the name his parents gave him define equality and unity? Isn't denying a man the freedom to embrace his own name a denial of precious Freedoms? That flies in the face of what Wednesday's historical nomination represents. If jaded individuals choose to judge a man by a label, then shouldn't we resist that instead of cowering to it?
Embrace history folks and champion equality for all; denying the truth will not set you free. More to the point, as last night's nomination was not about a man's name but about a man leading the Democratic ticket to lead this great country of ours into a world of uncertainty and promise. It is also about the importance of historical milestones, which should not be confused as a qualification to lead.
Barack Obama's nomination places him in a very good position to be the next president of the United States. Regardless if the man loses the race to the White House, the implications are tremendous; a continued move forward toward racial unity that we may not fully realize until future generations, but a move forward none-the-less. How often do we quote Martin Luther King today? How often do we celebrate the life of an American icon such as MLK? The civil rights movement during that historical era has done more for racial unity and equality today than in the midst of the movement.
History is usually interesting and always relevant.
We are witnessing and living in times that will earn a significant place in history. Years from today, images of the Democratic National Convention 2008 will be in textbooks. Children and college students will study and write about this historical event that we are blessed to witness.
I won't dwell on how the politicians at the DNC 2008 mired the event, but I will say I had some explaining to do while I watched the show with my 9-year old daughter. Former President Clinton delivered his speech and exploited the event by hyperbolically bashing the GOP. Joe Biden did the same by declaring John McCain to be a good friend and then convincingly threw him under the bus.
I learned something last night, folks. I learned that politics is a rated R viewing; not because of violence or nudity, though salacious behavior is often topical as pols across this nation find themselves in the middle of a scandal. No, I am referring to leaders that say, "Trust me" and then betray a friend for their own selfish advancement. I am referring to former leaders that held positions of greatness in this nation take a strong position and then instantaneously reverse that very position for the sake of partisan politics.
Could not partisan politics take a back seat that evening? The phonies exploited Barack Obama's historical event to slip in a message, "vote for me." Perhaps, they had to do that, perhaps the message was not substantive enough on its own merits.
On Wednesday, August 27, day three of the DNC 2008, a roll call commenced to secure the votes from the delegates in attendance to officially nominate Barack Obama. In a show of Democratic unity, Hillary Rodham Clinton interrupted that roll call to have voices in unison affirm the nomination of Barack Obama.
History is in motion.
Thursday, August 28, 2008, on the anniversary of Martin Luther King's Dream Speech, Barack Obama will accept his Party's nomination at INVESCO Field at Mile High, away from the convention floor.
During the course of upcoming events and the remainder of this election the judgment, character, policy decisions rendered and promised by the candidates will be analyzed and reported.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. envisioned a nation where his children will one day live "where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."
Published by Tony Jingo
An American Patriot with an independent view on today's topics. Jingo (noun) One who vociferously supports one's country View profile
- Barack Obama and the Youth VotePoll after poll has shown it. Barack Obama is winning the youth vote, and winning it decisively. Iowa answered the question whether this enthusiasm would reflect at the polls, against the wishes of many pundits. Why d...
- Over-Capacity Crowd at Barack Obama Rally in Seattle, WashingtonFirst-person account of attending the Barack Obama rally at the Key Arena in Seattle
- Presidential Hopeful Barack Obama Pays Youngstown State University a VisitBeing invited by Youngstown, Ohio, mayor Jay Williams, I attended a Barack Obama rally held at my alma mater Youngstown State University in Ohio.
- Racial Issues in the Barack Obama Campaign: Jeremiah Wright, Obama-Bashing and Med...Is Barack Obama being over-scrutinized when it comes to racial issues in and around his campaign?
DNC Stories, Photos, Videos from Associated ContentHere is a collection of DNC stories, videos and photo slide shows from Content Producers and delegates covering the 2008 Denver convention for Associated Content.
- The Reasonable Barack Obama
- It's Official: Sen. Barack Obama Joins White House Race
- Rudy Giuliani: Views & Platform for the 2008 Election
- Majority of Americans Would Not Vote for Barack Obama
- Barack Obama: Fired Up and Ready to Go
- Barack Obama Addresses Newton, Iowa, Crowd on December 30
- Barack Obama: Facts and Fairytales




17 Comments
Post a CommentGreat article. I agree with J.P. Whickson in that I would have no problem voting for Colin Powell, but it scares me to death to think of Obama winning.
Great article. I wish, however, the first black nominee would have been someone else, like Colon Powell.
How'd I miss this one earlier? I'm still scared of an Obama administration - for our country's safety
Great reporting Tony well said!!!
Tony, this is excellent. So many other people left such glowing comments that I don't know what to add. I always look forward to what you write.
Great report!
Excellent Tony! I don't agree with you about McCain, but nontheless this is a thought provoking piece. I'm not an Obama fanatic oopps I mean fan, either as you know. You make a good point about an R rating too. Politics is not for the faint of heart, the noble, the weak, or children. And this is coming from someone who worked in politics near 20 years. On rare occasion, a politician comes along who actually does something spectacular and then folks in my profession sit back and say, ah - at last, this is what I meant to be doing. I can't criticize the Clintons for their behavior at the convention - that is what you have to do in politics - suck it up. Suck up your truth, your heart and your soul. Sad.
McCain should have been the nominee 8-years ago. We would be in a better position today. I have a lot of issues with Bush, mainly on how he (mis)managed the war effort and his tax plans. McCain is not Bush, especially regarding the economy and national security. Information on Both candidates is readily available. The reams of factual information regarding Barack Obama clearly spell out a man with dangerous economy designs, an ineptitude regarding our security, and an abundance of CLOSE corrupt, subversive ties, devoid of patriotic sentiment unless it is self serving. Aly, the rare moments Obama took charge on something was to kill Bills protecting infants, or working on Boards(Woods Foundation) w/terrorists (Ayers) doling out money to other orgs w/terrorist ties(Arab-Action_Network). I implore all voters to research, research, and research...
I'm the minority commenter here - and I always love your writing, Tony! You give facts and present strong arguments in politics. I just have to say coming from Texas - Bush left our state in such a mess after 2 terms as Governor that there is no way he was prepared for the White House either, yet America voted for him twice. Before Bush was Governor, Texas had no deficit, in fact - a budget surplus. When Bush left for the White House, Texas had the largest deficit it had seen in decades. Are we surprised Bush did the same thing for America? Is any Presidential candidate - alone - really totally prepared for the White House? I love that the voters of our nation are becoming more open minded about who they want to lead change. Change has to happen. Do people really think McCain will do that?
I share your sentiment, Shanika. Well said.