Introduction
In earlier lessons we determined the appropriate loads on a pitched roof joist / rafter for an example gable roof in Moscow, Idaho. For the rafters themselves, the unbalanced snow load of I pg = 64 psf governs, and this load is taken to be per square foot of horizontal projection (plan area). The Dead load of the roof was given to be 15 psf, and this is per square foot of inclined roof surface. So, then, to look at `bending' of the beam, in the sense of also including shear and deflection, we determined the loads perpendicular to the roof surface (perpendicular to the joists). These loads are:
ω DL perp = 19 plf, and
ω SL perp = 73 plf,
and the span of the joist is
L sloped = 17.3 ft (208 in.).
Now let's look at flexure.
M = ω L2 / 8 = (19 + 73) plf (17.3 ft)2 / 8 = 3440 lb-ft = 41,300 lb-in.
The Design Check is,
... Is fb ≤ Fb' ? ...
where,
fb = M/S,
where,
S = bh2/6 = 1.5 in. (11.25 in.)2 / 6 = 31.6 in.3.
(We're checking 2 x 12 DFL No. 2 joists.)
(Alternately, we can grab S from Table 1B of the National Design Specification (NDS) Supplement, which is not that crazy of an idea since we are also going to get our Design Value(s) from the Supplement. For the situation at hand, Fb = 900 psi (Table 4A).
And, where Fb' = Fb × Applicable Adjustment Factors.
So,
... fb = 41,300 lb-in. / 31.6 in.3 = 1310 psi.
Our Adjustment Factors are ... (See Table 4.3.1 of the NDS)
CD = 1.15 for Snow load duration,
CM = 1.0 (dry service)
Ct = 1.0 (normal temperatures),
CL = 1.0 (Beam Stability Factor, which is 1.0 since our roof sheathing will be attached directly to the compression edge of the joists preventing lateral displacement),
CF = 1.0 (Size Factor, from Supplement Table 4A),
Cr = 1.15 (Repetitive Member Factor),
and CI and Cfu are both 1.0.
So,
Fb' = 900 psi (1.15)(1.15) = 1190 psi.
Now for our Design Check ... (it's not lookin' very good)
Is fb = 1310psi ≤ Fb' = 1190 psi ? ... NO! ... not good.
Whoa; normally we frame roofs around here @ 24 in. o.c.; we anticipated that wouldn't be adequate and dropped down to 16 in. o.c., and that still isn't adequate.
Options:
1) go with tighter joist spacing,
2) take a look at higher grade joist material, or perhaps a larger section, or
3) consider engineered lumber.
Lumber is cheap these days; let's try 12 in. o.c. joist spacing.
Our loads on the joists will be ... 12/16 of those calculated, so, likewise,
... fb = (12/16) 1310 psi = 980 psi.
Is fb = 980psi ≤ Fb' = 1190 psi ? ... YES! ... good.
Deflection
Now, before we go and order all that wood, let's check deflection.
The ceiling will be gypsum, so the Live load deflection criteria will be,
Δ Live load ≤ L / 360.
The Live load on the joist is ... 12/16 (73 plf) = 55 plf.
We'll use L = 17.3 ft = 208 in.
For a `simple' span,
Δ = (5/384) ω L4 / EI,
where,
E = 1,600,000 psi (Table 4A of the NDS Supplement), adjusted with all the applicable Adjustment Factors for E, in this case all 1.0),
and,
I = 178 in.4.
So,
Δ = (5/384) (55 / 12 lb/in.)(208 in.)4 / (1,600,000 psi × 178 in.4) = 0.39 in.
Is 0.39 in. ≤ L/360 = 208 in. / 360 = 0.58 in.? ... Yes, good.
But let's also check the deflection due to Total load.
Per Table 1604.3 of the International Building Code (IBC), the appropriate limit is L/240 and we are permitted to use the deflection caused by L + 0.5D,
So,
that caused by L is 0.39 in.;
that caused by 0.5D will be, ... 0.5 × 19/73 × 0.39 in. = 0.05 in.;
so, then,
Δ L + 0.5 D = 0.39 in. + 0.05 in. = 0.44 in.
Is it less than L/240 = 208 / 240 = 0.87 in.? ... Yes, way yes; good!
REALLY GOOD!
All our design checks check ... albeit now with the joists at 12 in. o.c.
Discussion
Interestingly, if we had calculated `bending' based on the horizontal projection length of the joists (16 ft), and the horizontal projections of the load (64 psf and 16 psf), we would get the same fb. Here, I'll show you.
ω = (64 + 16) psf × 1 ft (trib width) = 80 plf.
M = ω L2 / 8 = 80 plf (16 ft)2 / 8 = 2560 lb-ft = 30,700 lb-in.
fb = M/S = 30,700 lb-in. / 31.6 in.3 = 970 psi.
(Well, I think I lost some accuracy in rounding, but we're close!)
That doesn't mean that using the horizontal projection is correct; it just means that for bending all the cosines cancel out top and bottom. For shear and deflection, THEY DO NOT (CANCEL OUT)!
References
Balance and Unbalanced Snow Loads on a Gable Roof, Jeff Filler, Associated Content.
Shear Design Check for a Pitched Roof Joist, Jeff Filler, Associated Content.
National Design Specification for Wood Construction and Supplement Design Values for Wood Construction, American Forest & Paper Association / American Wood Council, 1111 Nineteenth St., NW, Suite 800, Washington, D.C., 20036, www.awc.org, 2005 Edition.
International Building Code, International Code Council, 4051 West Flossmoor Road, Country Club Hills, IL 60478.
Published by Jeff Filler
Consulting Engineer, Educator, Aspiring Writer and Photographer, Husband, Father, and Serious Hunter. View profile
Home Design Software: Where to Find ItWe have all heard about the various home design software available at many retailers like Best Buy, however most of that, software costs more money than most of us want to spend.
Heavier Residential Footing DesignLesson illustrates by example two design options for a more heavily loaded footing: using a thick plain concrete footing or using a thinner but transversely reinforced one.- The Advantages of Using Gardening Design SoftwareComputer aided design is a great way to plan your garden. Learn about using computer aided design for your landscaping needs.
- Japanese Design for Your HomeGood design in your home is usually something that makes you feel the most comfortable.
- Review of Practical Web Design MagazineBeing a web designer I spend all too much time in front of my computer screen and was looking forward to checking out the physical "print" world again. To my surprise, I found a $15.00 magazine with CD devoted to web...
- Shear Design Check for a Pitched Roof Joist
- ASD and LRFD Design Checks for a Wood Beam
- Fundamentals of Web Design: Things You Need to Know BEFORE You Build
- Prescriptive Basement Wall Design
- Jewelry Design Ideas for Spring 2009
- Basement Retaining Wall Design Continued Reinforcement Details
- Understanding Color in Design




2 Comments
Post a Comment... without a structural ridge beam the rafter takes on axial load, so you would need to look at axial + bending combined.
How do you account for the horizontal thrust if you do not have a structural ridge beam%3F Do you design the beam with bending%2C shear and axial%3F