Bible Study: Basic Themes in John's Gospel

Adam Willard
The purpose of the Gospel of John seems to be to give a more literary account of Jesus (as opposed to strictly historical) and to set up the plot and dialogue structure in such a way as to make it more of an impact to those who hear/read it. John decided to freely manipulate the history of Jesus in order to follow the lines of certain themes and truths he believed foundational to the person and truth of Jesus Christ, all the while being inspired by the Holy Spirit, of course. In this endeavor, John certainly succeeded.

In John's Gospel, the book is set up into two distinct halves, the Book of Glory and the Book of Signs. He specifically set Jesus up over and against the Jewish ceremonies, traditions, and doctrines of his day in such a way to show that he understands his purpose unmistakably as an usurper. In John, Jesus usurps the Jewish understanding and way of life to such an extent that one would think he was simply a lunatic or megalomaniac; however, John also demonstrates, through signs as well as incredible dialogue and discourse, that Jesus may very well have support to back up his claims. Jesus goes from being a revolutionary radical who seems to seek trouble to speaking frankly and lovingly with his disciples. Then he is crucified, just as he always said he would be and he almost seems to welcome it. Then, just as he claimed, he is resurrected and maintains the same vocal authority with what appears to be a somewhat heightened physical power (e.g. he passes through walls, etc.).

By the end of John, there is little doubt that Jesus could be the man that John records him saying he is, which is actually God himself, Yahweh. He is not only worthy of being heard, no matter how radical his claims are, but obeyed, because no one else has "the words of eternal life" (John 6:68). By the end of John, only those who simply "do not get it" in the face of so much proof will fail to believe.

Certainly, John achieves his purpose in this book. It is still unknown whether this book was written before or after the epistles (1, 2, and 3 John). I can certainly see the validity in the argument that says that the bulk of John was written before the epistles and then the prologue and epilogue written at a much later date to wrap a few things up; namely, to further emphasize the physical humanity of Christ as well as to reconcile the two communities of John and Peter. Either way, I definitely think some of the main themes fit together. The epistles were written for a group of people who "know the truth" (1 John 2:21) and who "do not need anyone to teach" them (1 John 2:27), so they were simply meant to expound on things already understood and shared among them. The Gospel was written to be something of an autonomous witness to who Jesus was and the weight and validity of his claims. They both do their jobs well.

I gained immensely from the study of John's works. I prefer literature as he wrote it: full of parallelisms and symbolisms that show the mark of a higher power that set everything up. Amazingly enough, the higher power in John who set everything up was also the main character who was physically present in the story. That incredible idea is almost beyond belief, but once again, in all the way it is set up and demonstrated, it practically must be believed. I suppose the best way to describe it would simply be "awe-inspiring." It is impossible to get over the magnitude of what takes place in the Gospel of John. In my opinion, the fact that the Christology in John is the highest of the four Gospels is necessary, and in this day, fresh insight. We might never get past songs that only say "he calls me friend" if we did not understand that Jesus actually replaced the previous Jewish systems of festivals, doctrine, and sacrifice on which the Jews placed their understanding of God. Certainly, Jesus does descend and calls us friend, but it is only by the grace of a God who would otherwise be forever aloof, and deservingly so. I believe the power of Christ and his subsequent compassionate love as demonstrated in John are unparalleled by any other testimony to Christ. Anyone would do well to read John's Gospel; either for devotional reasons or just as a powerful work of literature, there is much to be gained.

Published by Adam Willard

I'm 28, happily married with our first baby boy. I'm a Returned Peace Corps Volunteer who served in South Africa from 2008-2010 and now I'm living with my family in Madagascar, serving as Christian missiona...  View profile

  • The first half of John, Jesus' glory is demonstrated.
  • In the second half, Jesus' authority is proved.
  • Jesus makes bold, almost insane claims throughout the book, then fulfills them all.
In the Gospel of John, he doesn't seem to be trying to write a historical account of Jesus' life and ministry so much as a literary account - he takes literary liberty with the order of some of the events in Jesus' life.

9 Comments

Post a Comment
  • jesuschick5/25/2010

    ~ness is free! all we have to do is beieve in Him and admit our sins and he will forgive us, he loves us that much! no matter what we have done . God cannot tell a lie.

    read first John

  • jesuschick5/25/2010

    to the anonymous guest , what your saying is that you don;t believe that Jesus is really God and that His standards are to high, and don't work in your life? I don't think they are high at all, God sent His only son to die for us, to pay for the sin of everyone of us! I find that the amazing thing Jesus is all powerful just like his father, he didn't have to die for me and you, for anyone, but he chose to! It says in John 3:16 " for God so LOVED the world that he gave His only begotten son that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have everlasting life." If anyone wants proof that God is real, just look around you, do you see the trees, the sky, the earth? man could not have made such amazing things as these." there cannot be a painting without a painter" the earth did not create itself like the religion evovlution teaches, God created earth, and everything in and on it, read genisis. No one can make something from nothing, accept for God. God is amazing! His grace and forgivne

  • H M M H6/18/2007

    Good overview - thanks

  • Adam Willard5/3/2007

    To the person who mentioned it being "naive". As a matter of fact, no. I actually spent an entire semester in a class that was just about the books of the Bible that John wrote (the gospel and three letters). In that much time (and out of class study) it'd be very hard to call this naive. We covered ALL the major opinions about the book of John, including many of the minor ones. This essay is the result of well-sought out research. You can question my personal evaluations if you choose, but there's nothing about this that is naive. I challenge you to do your own research and see if the most widely recognized scholars don't agree with the factual information I've put forth here.

  • Adam Willard5/3/2007

    To the anonymous commenters. John was certainly written by a man, by the Apostle John, in fact. If you read my other article on John, I think it gives a little more of the factual information behind the book, this one was mainly concerned with basic themes. At that, it was more concerned with a literary look at the book and its literary themes, whether you believe it to be divinely inspired or not. As far as fact goes, well, it depends on how you look at fact. As I stated, John didn't write this to get the history (i.e. timeline) right, but to get at the heart of who Jesus was. Two different types of fact, one the author, John, considered important, the other, he didn't.

  • anonymous5/3/2007

    wee wee, "thanks for the info." Aren't we naive here...

  • anonymous5/3/2007

    Basic themes in the book of John that don't work. I have never seen anything I've practiced, written in the Bible, really work right in my life. Are you sure that the book John is divine, or maybe it is just written by man, and is not fact. I"m not tryign to be sarcastic, I just think a little reality could be helpful as far as all this fundamentalist Christian ideology in US society today.

  • Rebecca Livermore5/3/2007

    This is a good overview of the book of John. The summary makes the big picture clearer.

  • Amy Witthohn5/3/2007

    Interesting Thanks for the info.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.