"These are not ordinary circumstances. In the midst of a financial crisis and a recession, allowing the auto industry to collapse is not a responsible course of action." President Bush's words of relief for the Big 3 automakers sent a wave of relief through Detroit.
Rick Wagoner, CEO of General Motors, thanked the Bush administration in a public statement. Chrysler, however, issued a statement thanking the president minutes after president Bush announced at a press conference that he was extending a loan to General Motors and Chrysler - with provisions. Ford also acknowledged president Bush's decision, although Ford company executives believe Ford is strong enough to withstand the downturn in the economy for a few more months and are not participating in the bailout.
By March of 2009, the automakers must show that they are in the process of restructuring, that they have wage concessions from autoworkers that will be implemented by December, and executive bonuses must be frozen. The government has the right to veto any automaker expenditure above $100 million. If those conditions are not met, the government retains the right to collect on the loans. If the conditions are met, the government can extend the loans, allocate additional loans, or collect on the loans - whatever may seem appropriate by the conditions presented. However, it is hoped that no other loans will be necessary and that the beleaguered automakers will be able to turn their companies around, then somehow begin making good on the loans.
But that is considered by many to be unrealistically optimistic, especially in three months.
Where did the president get the money? From the funds that he and Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson defended as being set aside only for banks and financial institutions. Previously opposed to using the TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) funds for anything other than the bailout or bolstering of financial institutions, the president felt it necessary to use part of the $700 billion bailout money in the end rather than pulling the money from some other area, precipitating a budget cut.
As for the somewhat popular notion of allowing the automakers to file Chapter 11 bankruptcy, president Bush said that that option was "unlikely to work for American automakers at this time." Although the president was not specific about what would happen when or if the automakers could not meet the requirements of the loans, it is believed that the president is favorable to allowing the Big 3 automakers to file for restructuring bankruptcy.
It is believed that the president actually reconsidered his stance under the pressure of possibly having one more blemish on his already tarnished legacy should one or more of the Big 3 automakers fail. It is certain that the Senate forced his hand when they refused to vote for a bailout last week. But it was Bush himself who said that the auto industry would surely collapse if the executive branch did not step in.
At the press conference, the president also said he did not want to place a heavier burden of job losses and failed companies in an otherwise downspiraling economy on the incoming president. And that could be true as well. But having the industry that has been looked upon as a cornerstone of the American economy for so many years collapse at the end of his presidency was a telling mark he apparently did not want on his record.
The latest Gallup Poll (November) places president Bush's job approval rating of 28%, his disapproval rating at 68%.
******
Sources:
MiamiHerald.com
MontrealGazette.com
Gallup.com
Published by Saul Relative
WVU graduate, with degrees in History, English, Secondary Education, Computer Programming, and Psychology (and nearly a degree in Political Science). Originally from West Virginia, with stints in Virginia,... View profile
$700 Billion Bailout Plan Fails in CongressWith only 207 of 435 voters supporting the $700 billion bailout plan, Congress failed to pass the proposal.- House Vote Fails for US Economic Bailout Plan - Dow Down 700 Points!The House of Representatives has turned down the bailout plan as it stands today. The market takes a serious plunge, as investors get even more worried.
Will Barack Obama Make His First Big Mistake by Supporting an Auto Indus...There's something to be said for an auto industry bailout. There's something to be said against one, too. Here's what CNBC reporters Joe Kernan, Becky Quick and Carl Quintanil...
"Big 3 Bailout" Latest Economic Crisis as General Motors, Ford, and Chry...There is growing support among politicians for what is being called the "Big 3 Bailout," a federal stimulus package designed to keep the automobile industry, for decades the cor...
General Motors Bailout? Can We Afford Not To?To be or not to be, that is the economic question facing legislators, the current and incoming presidents,. labor leaders, suppliers and manufacturers, unions and individuals af...
- Big Love, Polygamy and Polyamory
- Attractions in Big Spring, Texas
- The "Big Dig" Tragedy in Boston
- 10 Tips on How to Do Business with a Big Company
- Connection, Caring, Goals and Dreams with Dr. Jan Hoistad and Big Picture Partneri...
- Presidential Candidates State Positions on Stock Market Bailout, CEO Greed
- Bailout Agreement Close to Being Reached, but Who Does it Affect?





7 Comments
Post a CommentIt was a fairly good article and was reasonably well written. The conclusion drawn in the penultimate paragraph that Bush did not want this as part of his legacy is unwarranted by the facts. No more so than his (Bush's) contention that bankruptcy is "unlikely to work for American automakers at this time". The article mentions but seems to gloss over the failure of the Congress to get the votes necessary to do this on their own even though the Congressional leadership was fully in support of it. The latest Gallup poll (same one cited for the President) makes his number look good when compared to theirs! The congress has a favorable/unfavorable in the poll of 19/74.
I wish that they (both Congress and the President) would have let the automakers face the consequences of their poor business management skills. The British Leyland example is illustrative of what we may end up with here. After years of [umping money into the company, they still went bankrupt. Let the normal bu
Nice article...well written!
It was big of Bush to say that he didn't want to leave this problem for the incoming president-what's one more mess to clean up? Great article once again!
Very objective, well written article. My major concern about letting all these international corporations, including the financial institutions, fail without any effort to save them is that we are giving away our global economic status and our leverage in dealing with other nations for free. This provides leverage for other nations in times of crisis and it seriously hurts the leverage we could have had on other nations. What's next? Renaming a city after a foreign auto manufacturer?
I love the way this was characterized as Bush "not wanting to leave a mess for his successor", President Obama. Like two wars, a busted economy, and a complete gutting of environmental regulations are no problem!
:-)
Nice, tightly written and full of vital details. Thanks, Saul!