Starting with the three main items of evidence, "Testing the Big Bang" examines the prediction of the chemical composition of the universe, the interpretations of the Cosmic Microwave Background, and the observed Cosmological Redshift.
To the first, the book shows that the universe's matter doesn't matter; most of the predictions were borrowed from Steady State Theory, and every other theory has essentially the same 'prediction', which, incidentally, was made after the rough quantities of the elements in the universe were already known. This prediction, while probably true, is neither a prediction, nor does it support the Big Bang.
Second, the CMB, the supposed 'afterglow' of the Big Bang, passes only a few tests required of the near-mythical 'relic radiation.' It fails many, many more.
Finally, the book shows how the observed redshift in the light of distant galaxies isn't a prediction either; it's the starting observation. What's more, the velocity component of Hubble's Law, which measures intergalactic distances by redshift, is an unfounded assumption. In fact, Hubble himself disproved that very assumption in the 1950's, but, just as the inventor of Bigfoot was ignored by fanatics once he exposed his hoax, the True Believers of the Big Bang paid Hubble's proofs no heed.
"Testing the Big Bang" goes on to examine the observations we've made in more recent years, and shows conclusively that they don't add up to a Big Bang universe - or even an expanding one.
Then, the book continues, addressing other common arguments like Olber's Paradox and the viability of metric expansion. It wraps up with an analysis of what kind of universe we might really live in, based on the sum of all the best information available today.
For more information, pick up your copy through Amazon, Lulu, or most of the major bookstores. Happy anniversary, and happy learning!
Published by Bryan Belrad
The mind behind Zero Sum Theory, author of best-selling fiction and non-fiction, see what else he's up to on Facebook. View profile
Busta Rhymes CD Review:Big BangThis article delves into how I became a fan of Busta Rhymes, his album The Big Bang, and his BET Testimony on June 7, 2006.
A First Anniversary for a Physics MilestoneIn December of 2006, as a Nobel Prize was awarded for work on the CMB, a paper was published that would revolutionize our view of the Universe, setting events in motion that wou...- "The Big Bang Theory" Pilot Review"The Big Bang Theory" may have been the worst sitcom I have ever watched. The show is about two theoretical physicists, Leonard and Sheldon, who have an attractive girl, Penny, move across the hall from them.
- Preview of the New Show, The Big Bang Theory on CBSCBS is building up their own comedy night on Mondays. The Big Bang Theory is the newest addition to the lineup.
Is the Cosmic Microwave Background Proof of the Big Bang?The CMB is believed to be the 'echo' of the Big Bang: the remnant of radiation set loose during the Last Scattering, when, according to BBT, the universe became transparent to e...
- Is the Big Bang Theory in Trouble?
- Is the Big Bang a Strong Theory or a Weak Hypothesis
- Big Bang Bag - Mary Francis' Fashion Handbag for the Season
- Glimpsing What Was Before the Big Bang
- A Rational Cosmology: A Refutation of Big Bang Theory
- In a Nutshell, the Issues with Big Bang Theory
- Big Bang
- Get this book on Amazon: www.amazon.com/Testing-Big-Bang-Bryan-Belrad/dp/143481338X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books





4 Comments
Post a CommentHow do you deal with people who say you don't know what you're talking about? There have to be a lot of them out there.
Thank you both! Yes, Destiny, the problems with the theory have bothered me since I was just a wee nipper-kin. For one, we need a high spatial curvature for the velocity interpretation of redshifts to work, a low curvature for the matter:space ratio to be rational, and, according to the CMB, we have a zero (or near zero) curvature. Hmmmm. Another fav: we can see galaxies redshifts of up to 7.6 (so far), which is only possible if the expansion of the universe is slowing, yet our best data says it is actually speeding up. I know what you're thinking. Why, oh, why didn't I take the BLUE pill?
Congratulations on this anniversary!
And a high five to you also! This is very interesting. I have always known there were inaccuracies!