According to Bastardi, the reason behind the recent Snowpocalypse in the mid-Atlantic that paralyzed things with severe blizzards for a while was threefold. Number one, El Nino had a role because its state, currently, mirrored conditions in the 60s and 70s when there was a lot of...snow. That's right, just like this year, the mid-Atlantic had a lot of...snow. See, global warming advocates...this isn't that hard. Then, solar cycles apparently are behaving in a way that's similar to colder conditions. Finally, soot from volcanic explosions is also playing a role, blocking out the poles over the Arctic in high altitude conditions, which, apparently, helps with the increased snowfall and cooling.
Now, notice how Bastardi, again, for those global warming advocates who might have a hard time putting one and one together, uses science to make his arguments? Got that? Good! Now, for Bill Nye's lame attempt at a rebuttal. He already made an insurmountable mistake when he started it off by arrogantly declaring that the evidence is "overwhelming." Just like there's a so-called, mythical "consensus," right Bill Nye, the Junk Science Guy? Not content to look incredible, Nye then turned to a fancy-schmancy prop (Seriously, folks, who in their right mind brings props to a debate on the O'Reilly Factor? First time I've ever seen that.) that he must've prepared himself in his basement or garage just before air time. He claimed that it proved that carbon dioxide levels increased from 1750 to today. However, the huge problem with this is how unscientific it was: Nye never divulged how he came to these results unlike Bastardi, who at least had his meteorological data to back up his assertions! Further, Nye completely killed off any vestiges of remaining credibility when he put all his trust into a chart from the IPCC...again, seriously. We all know that the IPCC has been relentlessly shamed for dubious research methods and sourcing (like including non-peer reviewed papers), so basing anything off a chart of theirs is misleading at worst, highly doubtful at best.
Bastardi, again, because he's actually a scientist with credentials in the weather field and thus can speak more authoritatively than the has-been host of a 90s kids show, hammered Nye hard in his counterattack. This time, Bastardi went to more hard data-unlike the IPCC chart-clinging Nye who even interrupted Bastardi at one point and looked angry when O'Reilly had to "shush" him like you would a little child who spoke out of turn-to make the point that the effects of global warming are moot. That is to say, when you factor in the sun, the oceans, volcanic activity and even a natural reversal of cycles, you'd still only get an effect less than "the yearly human contribution equal to the width of a hair on a 1 KM bridge of trace gas needed for life." Again...negligible as far as global warming is concerned!
Back to Nye it went for another rebuttal, and this has-been from a 90s kids show couldn't stop using the completely discredited charts and "reports" from the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). I refuse to waste my time or yours by listing all their black eyes here; just do a Google search with "IPCC" and "scandal" and be stunned at the number of precise results you get. Aside from this, Nye then went on to shamelessly mischaracterize completely the Climategate scandal, branding it as, essentially, name-calling between scientists, but Climategate centered around damning e-mails from scientists essentially confessing they cooked up data in favor of global warming. Not happy with implicating himself as a completely poor debater, Nye then proceeded to confirm in the minds of viewers what a total global warming shill he is-and thus not one to be taken seriously-by playing conspiracy theorist. He actually asked, rhetorically, in whose best interest it was for global warming to be denied...like the camp who rightly doesn't believe in global warming is somehow agenda-driven. This is just insanity from an avowed left-winger in Bill Nye the Junk Science Guy.
Based on this debate, it's beyond clear how each side in the global warming debate...debates. The skeptical side as represented by Bastardi in this exchange, uses science, data and actual research based on decades of work to make their arguments. Bill Nye the Junk Science Guy's side of fanatical, global warming advocates uses, like the blind lemmings they are, IPCC "data" and then mindlessly parrots the BS how the evidence in their camp is "overwhelming." You folks will make your own minds up, but for my money, it's clear that the pro-global warming side are thugs in a debate. They cut you off, they arrogantly declare the science is settled, and they have no facts. This also proves how global warming is viewed as a cult by some because the belief in it by adherents like Bill Nye is just insane.
To send Marc questions, praise or criticism, you can email him at marc_schenker@telus.net
More Reading: Obama Administration Caught Lying, Tougher Jon Stewart Jokes may Signal Collapse of Remaining Vestiges of Obama Support, Scandal-plagued Democrat Chris Dodd resigns
Sources:
El Nino, Wikipedia
Anthony Watts, The scandal deepens, Wattsupwiththat.com
Joe Bastardi, Wikipedia
Climactic Research Unit hacking incident, Wikipedia
Bill Nye in No Spin Zone, FoxNews.com
Published by Marc Schenker
Contact Marc at marc_schenker@telus.net to praise, criticize, or request anything of him since he fears nothing or no one. Marc Schenker is a political junkie and Political Writer and Analyst for Associated... View profile
- How to Advance Your Child's Science SkillsThere are some kids who naturally enjoy science.
- The Wonder of Internet RadioInternet radio is just now starting to make a dent in this world of hi-tech electronics and on demand media. Most traditional radio shows are now pursuing such outlets as internet radio and podcasts to make their sho...
- How to Write with Children in the HouseBeing a working from home mom causes me to be creative, but I have to use good time management.
- InterRacial Relations in the New MillenniumThis is an essay of hope. The hope, if I may speak frankly, is that I'll someday find a white chick who will still be able to comfortably call me, a black male, "her ni&&a" in the morning.
The Inconvenient Truth Behind Global Cooling, Global Dimming and Global...There is a debate in the scientific community about the supposed effects of global cooling as compared to the alleged consequences of global warming and some claim that global c...
- Website HowTo and Review: The Eyes of Nye, Bill Nye the Science Guy
- Bill Nye the Junk Science Guy
- November 27: Today's Notable Birthdays
- Top Ten Food Network Programs
- Free Online Learning Resources for Junior High Students
- Who is Meteorologist Jeff Masters, the Man Behind the Snowpocalypse, Global Warmin...
- Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego: One of the Best PBS Kids Shows of All Time





24 Comments
Post a CommentI saw the show mentioned in this article and I disagree that Bill Nye was "clobbered". It was obvious to me that the weather forecaster, Joe, did not base what he was saying on proven scientific facts. He seemed to be giving his opinion based on his personal beliefs about global warming. It is a known fact that even his style of weather forecasting is critized by many. The Houston Chronicle has called him "worst weather forecaster". Bill Nye studied mechanical and aerospace engineering at Cornell University and he graduated with an engineering degree. He also studied under Carla Sagan.
That's high praise coming from you, Mr. Snidely Whiplash! Rest assured that I will indeed carry the torch in a way that will make you gush with pride.
Another great one Marc. Now knock it off - you're really making me look bad. I used to be the conservative in your face voice round here, but now I'm suckin' hind tit. Good job Killer. Maybe I can pass the torch to you safely and move on to greener pastures. You're damn good Dude. Keep up the good work Marc, and kudos Brother.
Soon there will be a new theory, more 'research' - more arguments-but people can't solve this. Maybe there is nothing to solve.
Another winner!
I remember in the 70s when they were concerned about global cooling! (That's a shame about Bill Nye. I kind of liked his show... very entertaining :)
Thanks for another great article, Marc!
I can't believe somebody beat up on Bill Nye the Science Guy! I used to love watching him... :-)
Very interesting Marc, didn't watch O'Reilly as I was watching Olympics! Rats!
And to think that I watched Bill Nye when I was a kid...*sigh* I totally forgot about him until you wrote this article, nicely done.