Black People Owe Very Little to White People
The Flawed Logic of Pat Buchanan and Other Racist Americans
For what, you may be asking, are black people supposed to be so grateful? Well, Buchanan writes the following, which I will undoubtedly be accused of taking "out of context" from you Cons out there:
"It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known."
"...no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans. Untold trillions have been spent since the '60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream."
"Governments, businesses and colleges have engaged in discrimination against white folks - with affirmative action, contract set-asides and quotas -- to advance black applicants over white applicants.
"Churches, foundations, civic groups, schools and individuals all over America have donated time and money to support soup kitchens, adult education, day care, retirement and nursing homes for blacks."
Now, the thing that is so interesting and disgusting about Buchanan's flawed reasoning, is that, in the opinion of this author, it is an all too common way of thinking among ignorant and defensive white folks. It is not a stretch to say that MOST white people in America would at least agree with Buchanan's basic premise - that black people should show more "gratitude" to white people for lifting up blacks. The sad thing is that people who think this way probably don't even realize just how racist these views are, or how unbelievably illogical, and in fact, offensive they are.
What Buchanan and people like him conveniently gloss over, is the fact that it was white men who were overwhelmingly responsible for the slave trade, and enslaved blacks in this very country, amassing incredible levels of wealth on their labor - in fact, this includes more than a few of the very white men responsible for founding this country under the premise that "all men are created equal". However, in his article, Buchanan refers to slavery almost as if it were not white people who enslaved blacks, but some third party - perhaps Klingons - who were primarily responsible for the trade and enslavement of black human beings. Furthermore, when slavery ended, it was not done peacefully, as a result of the good grace of white American slaveholders, but rather, by force - a little known event called the Civil War - maybe Buchanan was absent from school for that lesson, at home sick watching Howdy Doody perhaps - and while slavery was the issue that the conflicts that led to Civil War revolved around, it wasn't the primary impetus for the Lincoln's willingness to prevent Southern secession, at least not at first.
The point is that there is no gratitude owed to people who enslave others, and only undo the chains when forced to at gunpoint. Then, after being forced to release the human beings they enslaved, the wonderful white people Buchanan believes blacks should be so grateful toward, passed laws to keep the ungrateful black people of America in quasi-slavery for another one hundred years - Jim Crow and Black Codes - and formed organizations like the Ku Klux Klan to terrorize blacks and whites of good conscience.
Then, the end of Jim Crow and segregation in America did not come about from white Americans voluntarily reforming in an attempt to "lift up" black Americans. No - change happened because black people themselves rose up, literally sacrificing their lives at times, and demanded equality and the right to live without being terrorized, If left up to white racists like Buchanan, black people would probably still be drinking from separate water fountains, and hanging from trees for looking the wrong way at white women.
The second half of Buchanan's racist and flawed thinking is that blacks should be grateful for the "untold trillions" spent on social programs that black people may or may not have participated in. First of all, the programs Buchanan lists were not created exclusively for black people, and in reality, the programs listed were primarily utilized by white people. Secondly, even if black people have benefited from these programs, there is hardly cause for "gratitude" toward white Americans for providing services they should have had equal access to in the first place, and which hardly settle the score or correct the damage inflicted from hundreds of years of slavery.
In this sense, the "white guilt" that conservatives like Buchanan revile, is totally appropriate. In 1860, for instance, there were approximately 4 million slaves in the US. Let's say, that if those slaves were free workers and earned even a very modest 2 dollars per week (most likely more), they would have earned 416 million dollars in just that one year. If we were to taking it back 200 years and calculate what salve populations would have earned as free black workers, the number becomes astronomical. Then there is the massive amount of wealth accumulated by southern land holders and northern businesses that also profited from the immoral and anti-human practice of slavery. Despite this enormous debt owed to slaves and their descendants, no reparations have ever been paid to slaves or their descendants by either the southern plantation owners, or the US government that allowed the institution of slavery to exist, and later turned a blind eye to Jim Crow. In fact, lazy, racist white southerners were largely allowed to keep the wealth they generated on the backs of black slaves, and today, while black people endure various forms of intitutionalized racism and fester in ghettos devoid of opportunity, that inescapably lead to the alleged black crime Buchanan whines about, just mentioning reparations will make you the subject of ridicule and/or anger from subtly racist defensive white people.
The bottom line here, and what people like Buchanan can't make out through the fog of their racism, is that white Americans are owed very little gratitude from black Americans, because any of the significant progress black people have made came as a result of their own organizations, struggles and demands for equality. Of course, there has traditionally been a small group of white people, activists and sympathetic elites and politicians in key positions who have helped. But, white people as a whole have done little to help black people, and only embrace them when and if they present themselves as "less black", and attack their own poor people (see bill Cosby), and/or if they abandon talking about inequality and race matters - because ya know, god forbid we white Americans should confront our racism and racist past.
Published by paul angelo
- The Problems of the People by the People
- Why Do Black People Defend and Back Michael Vick?
- Why do People Judge me Because I'm Fat?
- Product Review: Fisher Price Little People School Bus
- Product Review: Little People Animal Sounds Farm
- Review of Little People Sound Stable
- Product Review: Little People Musical Christmas Train
- Pat Buchanan is a racist
- White people have done very little for black people
- Reparations are appropriate






26 Comments
Post a CommentYou are aware that those 'lazy, racist white southerners' didn't have anything left after Reconstruction, yes? Many of the former plantation owners starved to death. Actually, Reconstruction did more to damage race relations in this country than anything - completely uneducated former slaves were turned loose on a land that had been largely devastated. They had no opportunities, because the whites were more inclined to help their starving brothers than their former slaves. This set up another century of race rivalry, bitterness, and misplaced anger.
I don't think that anyone of any color owes anyone anything. Still, the descendants of former slaves should also be outraged at how badly they were cheated by Reconstruction.
interesting article. You should read up on more history though if you think white yankees died to free slaves. US grant said he would surrender his sword if he knew that had been what he was fighting for and lincoln was more racist than many slave owners.
I thought your article was very interesting and honest. I actually appreciated your view and appreciated your sharing. I just wanted to note that indentured servitude is quite different than being enslaved. One insures freedom at some point and in many cases is voluntary to repay a debt. The other, well, we know that story already. In any event, there are many unfortunate souls who refuse to see why slavery was such a large issue, even though it happened MANY years ago. I think it would be pointless to waste your breath explaining the obvious to those who simply choose to remain blind. That isn't your fault and you don't have to defend anything. Sometimes things are "..invisible, understand, simply because people refuse to see..."
White folks always say we did not do anything to you blacks. But you will have to pay for what your forefathers did stupid.If you can read go to your bible it has many times when the Israelites did not obey God, they got punished for it. Guess what white folks,just like we the black folks had to pay for our forefathers mistakes, so shall you. So do not say we did nothing to blacks, but understand you WILL still pay.OH, plus blacks are going to turn on you white folks, so get ready to fight your own battle in the end.
Marquis, this whole thing about white slaves is just silly. In the context of this particular discussion, to even begin to compare any of that to the institution of black slavery in America is insulting to all of us, seriously. Oh, and by the way, the Black Panthers then and now, don't "hate" white people. In fact, the Black Panthers are known for working with many whites of like mind.
Nope, sorry--Jim Crow still existed not even 50 years ago, and only ended because BLACK PEOPLE, and many brave white people as well, rose up and demanded equality. The Civil Rights Act was only signed into law because of the demands of black people themselves, not by the good will of white people in power. So, I'm saying that hundreds of years of severe discrimination and inequality don't dissappear in less than 50 years. Lastly, I'm not trying to defame of humilate white people--I am only pointing out that Pat Buchanan, and you I guess, are idiots to say that black people "owe" any debt to white people. That is an absurd notion, and you are silly for defending it. The only way to overcome our unfortunate past is for people to start being honest about it, and that doesn't mean that I, or anyone else, should blame slavery on white people living today--it only means that idiots like Pat Buchanan and you, should stop trying to rewrite or whitewash our ugly history of slavery, or dowplay
It is you who are not making any sense. You are dredging up past events in some monstrous attempt to defame and humiliate an entire race of people for acts committed over 150 years ago. The effects of all past occurrences are still evident today, hence the word "history" for those of us who understand that. What Pat Buchanan was saying is that white people have ended the practice of slavery and have helped those victimized by it. Whether or not you choose to believe this or not is your problem. Just don't make it everyone else's problem. Keep your vindictive demented thinking to yourself. You are not helping anyone. I would suggest concentrating your efforts on those countries that still practice slavery which, by the way are, in Africa if you really want to help anyone.
Carla, sorry, but you aren't making sense because you are angry that I called you out on your stupid statements. Listen, the bottom line is that I've expressed no hatred for anyone in this article--except arguably Pat Buchanan. And it has nothiong to do wth "past resentments"--it has to do with actual real life, tangible affects of slavery that still exist today. If you wish to ignore it and call me names, then be my guest
It is you who are ignorant and hateful. I don't care if you are white or not, you are an embarrassment to any demographic. Why don't you get your head out of your butt and stop hating white people when we already did the right and ended slavery, period. .Got it? It's over for those of us who live in the present. Past resentments yield nothing. It's morons like you who keep hate alive and people mired down in victimization with your own illusions of self-importance. Stay under your rock, you belong there.
One more thing Carla--I mentioned this in the article, and in another comment and I say again to you--the progress, rights and freedoms black people have today are mostly a result of THEIR OWN initiative, sacrifices and hard work--so your bit about black people "bemoaning their circumstances", and sitting around doing nothing, once again shows that you have no knowledge of history, and should educate yourself before so negatively commenting on peoples articles, and accusing them of racism.